Introduction to Economic Evaluation - Key Terms (Week 1)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/33

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key terms and concepts from Week 1 of Introduction to Economic Evaluation.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

34 Terms

1
New cards

Economic evaluation

A systematic and explicit method to weigh up the costs and benefits of health interventions to inform decision‑making, aiming to maximise benefits from scarce health care resources.

2
New cards

Health Technology Assessment (HTA)

A process that evaluates the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost‑effectiveness of health technologies to inform policy decisions.

3
New cards

PBAC

Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee; recommends new medicines for listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in Australia, considering condition, effectiveness, safety, cost‑effectiveness, and total cost.

4
New cards

MSAC

Medical Services Advisory Committee; appraises new medical services proposed for public funding, using safety, effectiveness, cost‑effectiveness, and total cost.

5
New cards

Opportunity cost

The value of the next best alternative forgone when a choice is made.

6
New cards

Fixed health budget

A non‑infinite health budget; resources must be allocated to maximise health within a set limit.

7
New cards

Allocative efficiency

Decisions about which programs to fund to maximise social welfare and health benefits.

8
New cards

Technical efficiency

The most efficient way to produce a given level of health outcomes (doing things right).

9
New cards

Welfare economics (Welfarism)

Theoretical framework where social welfare is the sum of individual utilities and informed by consumer preferences.

10
New cards

Extra‑welfarism

An approach that adds health outcomes, equity, and social goals to welfare considerations; supports the idea of merit goods funded by government.

11
New cards

Incremental analysis

Comparison of a new program with a relevant comparator to assess additional costs and benefits.

12
New cards

Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

ICER = (Cost of new treatment − Cost of standard treatment) / (Health benefit with new treatment − Health benefit with standard treatment).

13
New cards

Cost‑effectiveness plane

A graphical plot of incremental costs (vertical axis) against incremental effects (horizontal axis) to interpret cost‑effectiveness.

14
New cards

Dominance

A new treatment dominates if it is more effective and less costly; is dominated if it is less effective and more costly.

15
New cards

Cost‑minimisation analysis (CMA)

An economic analysis used when outcomes are equivalent; compare costs only.

16
New cards

Cost‑effectiveness analysis (CEA)

An economic evaluation measuring outcomes in natural units (e.g., life years gained).

17
New cards

Cost‑utility analysis (CUA)

A type of CEA where outcomes are adjusted for quality of life using QALYs or DALYs.

18
New cards

Cost‑benefit analysis (CBA)

An analysis that values costs and benefits in monetary terms to calculate net benefits; uses willingness‑to‑pay values.

19
New cards

Cost‑consequence analysis (CCA)

An economic evaluation that lists costs and outcomes separately without aggregating into a single metric.

20
New cards

Budget impact analysis (BIA)

Assesses the financial consequences of adopting a new intervention for a budget holder over a short‑ to medium‑term horizon (3–6 years).

21
New cards

QALY

Quality‑adjusted life year; one year of perfect health equals 1 QALY; combines length and quality of life on a 0–1 scale (0 = dead, 1 = perfect health).

22
New cards

DALY

Disability‑adjusted life year; a measure of overall disease burden representing years lost to ill health, disability, or death (higher DALYs = worse health).

23
New cards

Life years gained

Additional years of life provided by an intervention.

24
New cards

Karnofsky scale

A health status measure of functional impairment; not generally interval‑level, so interpretation in some analyses is limited.

25
New cards

SF‑36

A 36‑item health survey assessing health‑related quality of life across multiple domains; not always interval‑level for all analyses.

26
New cards

interval properties

A property of measurement scales where equal changes have equal impact; important for meaningful comparisons in health measures.

27
New cards

Health‑related quality of life measures

Tools (e.g., SF‑36, Karnofsky) used to capture how health states affect quality of life in economic evaluations.

28
New cards

Cost of illness (COI)

Estimates the total economic burden of a disease; used as input for economic evaluations but has limitations in guiding decisions.

29
New cards

Human capital approach

Valuing health gains by the economic value of productivity, such as wages and future earnings.

30
New cards

Revealed preferences

Values inferred from observed behaviors (e.g., wage premiums for risky jobs) to value outcomes.

31
New cards

Stated preferences

Values derived from hypothetical willingness‑to‑pay questions to value outcomes.

32
New cards

Willingness‑to‑pay threshold

The maximum amount decision‑makers are willing to pay per unit of health gain; used to judge ICERs.

33
New cards

Merit good

A good or service that the government provides beyond what the free market would supply, often for equity reasons.

34
New cards

League table

Ranking of interventions by cost‑effectiveness to aid decision‑making and prioritisation.