1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
transformation from Rn to Rm is a
rule that a given input in Rn has an Rm output
transformation notation
T:Rn → Rm ; Rn is the domain, Rm is the codomain
we define transformation (as notated above) as TA =
Av, for all v ∈ Rn (domain’s space)
reflection in x-axis
multiply vector/point by
A = [1 0]
[0 -1]
rescaling in x direction (and key c values)
multiply vector/point by
A = [c 0]
[0 1]
x-expansion if c > 1
x-contraction if 0 < c < 1
rescaling in y direction
multiply vector/point by
A = [1 0]
[0 c]
x-shear
multiply vector/point by
A = [1 c]
[0 1]
identity transformation
Inv = v ; Rn → Rn
zero transformation
0mxnv = 0→ ; Rn → Rn
can discern matrix transformation if it
sends zero vector to itself
define composition T º S: Rn → Rl by
[T • S][v] = T(S(v)); S is followed by T
![<p>[T • S][v] = T(S(v)); S is followed by T</p>](https://knowt-user-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/a9842aa3-1306-426d-aa40-f29813f26aa0.jpg)
is it a given that AB = BA?
no, but is possible
IA =
A (and commutative)
A(BC) =
(AB)C (associative)
A(B + C) =
AB + AC (distributivity)
(B + C)A =
BA + CA
k(AB) =
(kA)B = A(kB)
if AB = CB, we cannot conclude that
A = C
block multiplication
see miguel lecture 7