1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Proposition
A statement with a truth value of true or false, not both
Truth Value
Value true or false assigned to a proposition
Negation (¬p)
¬p is true when p is false and false when p is true which means not p
Conjunction (p ∧ q)
true iff both p q are true which means p and q
Disjunction (p ∨ q)
(p ∨ q) is true if at least 1 of p or q is true ; p or q or both
Exclusive Or (p ⊕ q)
(p ⊕ q) true if exactly 1 p or q is true ; p or q but not both
Conditional (p → q)
(p → q) is false only when p is true and q is false which means if p then q
Biconditional (p ↔ q)
(p ↔ q) is true if p and q have the same truth value which means p if and only if q
Compound Proposition
A proposition formed by combining propositions using logical connectives
Logical Connective
A symbol used to connect propositions such as not and and or implies and if and only if
Truth Table
A table with truth values of a compound proposition for all cases
Propositionally Equivalent (p ≡ q)
p ≡ q means p q have identical truth tables; logically the same
Tautology
A compound proposition that is true for all possible truth values
Contradiction
A compound proposition that is false for all possible truth values
Contingency
A proposition that’s true in some cases and false in others
De Morgan’s Law not and
¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q which means negation of and becomes or with negations
De Morgan’s Law not or
¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q which means the negation of or becomes and with negations
Double Negation Law
¬(¬p) ≡ p which means negating a statement twice gives the original statement
Identity Laws
p ∧ T ≡ p and p ∨ F ≡ p which means combining with true or false does not change the statement
Domination Laws
p ∨ T ≡ T and p ∧ F ≡ F which means true or false dominates and
Idempotent Laws
p ∨ p ≡ p and p ∧ p ≡ p which means repeating a statement changes nothing
Commutative Laws
p ∨ q ≡ q ∨ p and p ∧ q ≡ q ∧ p order doesnt matter
Associative Laws
(p ∨ q) ∨ r ≡ p ∨ (q ∨ r) which means grouping does not matter
Distributive Laws
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) which means or distributes over and
Absorption Laws
p ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p which means extra info doesnt change result (got absorbed)
Argument
A set of propositions (premises) followed by a conclusion
Premise
A statement assumed to be true
Conclusion
A statement logically derived from the premises
valid condition
iff premise imply conclusion; iff whenever all premise is true; conclusion true