1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Important consideration for extinction❌
Have you implemented punishment first?
Advantage of free-operant assessments✅
Less likely to produce problem behavior
Spontaneous recovery💥
When a behavior suddenly begins to occur after it has decreased or stopped entirely
Resistant to extinction⏳
Behavior on an intermittent schedule of reinforcement
Asking about stimulus preferences🗣
Generally has a high number of false positives and low false negatives
DRA♻️
Use to decrease one behavior while increasing a new behavior
Paired-stimulus preference assessment⚖️
Present two stimuli simultaneously and have client choose one
Reinforcer assessment📈
Direct, data-based method to verify if a stimulus functions as a reinforcer
Full-session DRL🍬
Student gets candy when leaving desk fewer than 4 times during a lesson
Preference assessment❌
Does not determine if a stimulus functions as a reinforcer
Single-stimulus presentation🎯
Best for clients who have difficulty selecting among multiple stimuli
DRI🛑
Used to make a behavior occur less without necessarily eliminating it
Multiple stimulus with replacement🔁
Chosen stimulus remains in array for next trial
Extinction burst🔥
Increase in responding when extinction is first implemented
Ineffective extinction❌
Increase in behavior
DRO⏱
Reinforcer provided after set time of no problem behavior (e.g., Jamie’s mom gives reward after 5 mins)
Free-operant observation👀
Assessing preference by recording activities with unrestricted choice
Not a preference assessment method❌
Whole-interval observations
Preference assessments
Ways to find out what a person likes and might work for 💭
Identifying potential reinforcers
Reinforcers must be proven by testing, not just by guessing or asking others 🎯
Two strategies
Stimulus preference assessments and reinforcer assessments ⚖️
Preference/reinforcer caveats
Preferences change over time, so check often; preference doesn’t always mean reinforcement ⚠️
Stimulus preference assessments
Identify what a person likes, how much they like it, and under what conditions 🔍
Three types
Asking about preferences, free-operant observation, and trial-based observation 📊
Asking about preferences
Ask open-ended, specific, choice, or rank-order questions 🗣️
Pre-task choices
Offer fun options before work (ex. “After you finish, you can play Battleship, checkers, or use the computer”) 🎮
Asking significant others
Ask caregivers or teachers what the person might like 👩🏽🏫
Advantages of asking
Simple and quick ⚡
Problems with asking
People’s answers don’t always match real behavior; high chance of false positives 🚫
Free-operant observation
Watch what someone chooses to do when they have free access to all items or activities 👀
Naturalistic free-operant
Done in normal settings like recess; record how long they engage with each item 🌳
Contrived free-operant
Done in a controlled setting; expose person to items first, then observe and record time spent ⏱️
Free-operant advantages
Quick and less likely to cause problem behavior since items aren’t taken away ✅
Trial-based methods
Present items in trials and record how the person reacts or engages; rank items as high, medium, or low preference 📋
Single-stimulus method
Present one item at a time and record the reaction; best for people who struggle to choose 🎯
Paired-stimulus method
Present two items at once, have the person pick one; rank preferences based on choices ⚖️
Multiple-stimulus method
Show three or more items at once; can be done with or without replacement 🔁
Guidelines for preference assessments
Watch for motivating factors, weigh time vs. accuracy, use fewer items if rushed, and combine methods for best results 🧠
Reinforcer assessment
Test if a preferred item actually increases behavior by giving it after a response and seeing if the behavior grows 📈
Extinction
Stopping reinforcement for a behavior so the behavior decreases in the future; the behavior now has a 0% chance of being reinforced 😶🌫️⬇️.
Functional/Nonaversive treatments
Methods like extinction, differential reinforcement, and antecedent changes that reduce behavior without punishment and are based on functional assessments 🧠✨.
Attention extinction
Not giving attention when the problem behavior happens 🙅🏽♀️👀.
Tangible extinction
Not giving access to items when the problem behavior happens 🎁🚫.
Escape extinction
Not allowing escape from a task when the problem behavior happens 📝🔒.
Automatic extinction
Blocking or removing sensory reinforcement that maintains the behavior 🔇🤖.
Extinction burst
A temporary increase in the behavior when extinction first starts 😤📈.
Spontaneous recovery
The behavior briefly reappears after it has already decreased 👻↩️.
Differential reinforcement (DR)
Reinforcing a desirable behavior while not reinforcing the problem behavior 🌟➡️🚫.
DRA
Reinforcing a desirable alternative behavior while the problem behavior is not reinforced 💡👍.
DRI
Reinforcing a behavior that can’t happen at the same time as the problem behavior 🙌❌🤦🏽♀️.
FCT
Teaching and reinforcing communication that replaces the problem behavior 🗣️💬✨.
DNRA
Escape or avoidance happens only after the desirable behavior, not after the problem behavior 🚪➡️🙂.
DRO
Reinforcing the absence of the problem behavior for a set amount of time; interval resets if the behavior occurs ⏱️🚫.
Whole-interval DRO
Problem behavior must be gone for the entire interval to earn reinforcement 🔁✨.
Momentary DRO
Problem behavior must be gone only at the end of the interval to earn reinforcement ⏳👀.
DRL
Reinforcing lower rates of a behavior when you want it to occur less often but not disappear 📉🙂.
Full-session DRL
Reinforcement given when total responses stay below a set number during the whole session 📊✔️.
Spaced-responding DRL
Reinforcement given only if enough time has passed since the last response; early responses reset the timer ⏱️🔄.
Reinforcer assessments
Ways to find effective reinforcers, like single-stimulus, paired-stimulus, or MSWO tests 🎯🧸🍬.