1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Alukhadar and Senecal 2011
Identified 3 types of online shoppers
basic communicators - use internet less frequently, mainly for communicating via email
lurking shoppers - heavy online shoppers and use internet frequently searching for info
social thrivers - heaviest internet users and exploit social features of online platforms such as chatting, blogging, streaming
Alan et al 2017
narcissism, self-esteem and big 5 traits were positively related to intentions to shop online
Stuppy et al 2020
consumers with low self-esteem gravitated towards inferior products
self-verifying pessimistic views of themself
Bosnjak et al 2007
3 of the big 5 traitss had small influence on willingness to online shop
neuroticism and agreeableness had negative effect on willingness
openness to experience had positive effect on willingness
Lee and Koo 2012
negative product reviews are perceived as more credible and influential
Park and Feinberg 2010
Normative consumer conformity is related to internal consumer characteristics
Informational consumer conformity is related to external virtual community characteristics
Cheung and To 2017
mobile users w/ positive attitudes towards in-app ads, strong subjective norms, low perceived behaviour control are more likely to watch in-app ads
affected behavioural response
users with high propensity to trust have stronger intentions to know about the advertised product
De Vierman et al 2017
Influencers having a high amount of followers positively affected popularity and opinion leadership
However, if influencers themselves followed few account, their likeability was negatively impacted
When promoting a product perceived as unique, attitudes towards new brands were positively impacted
No effect or negative effect for known brands
Franke et al (2023)
Human influencers outperform virtual influencers in influencing attitudes towards the endorser and the ad
Higher perceived congruence between the influencers (human/virtual) and the endorser results in higher perceived expertise
Kim and Kim (2021)
High congruence/Emotional connection between product and influencer can encourage positive attitudes towards product and ad recognition
when adding sponsorship label, consumers may think influencer is doing it for the money (calculative motive) and as a result less positive attitudes towards product but it does make ad more recognisable
Stubb and Coliander (2019)
when influencer posts were labelled as ‘not sponspored’, consumers perceptions of trustworthiness increased
when influencers posts with direct shopping links there was increased recognition of adverts, but reduced influencer credibility and weakened brand attitudes
when using both, consumers were more skeptical
Ki and Kim 2019
attractiveness of content was indicative of taste leadership, positively impacting perceptions leading to increased desire to mimic the influencers behaviour
expertise content was indicative of opinion leadership, positively impacting perceptions leading to increased desire to mimic behaviour
Sokolova and Kefi 2020
Attitude homophily is strongly related to credibility and parasocial interaction, which are both strongly related to purchase intention
Su et el 2021
physical, social and task attraction are positively related to parasocial relationships
stronger PSRs increases informational influence and credibility, which increases purchasing intentions
Positive comments increase PSR impact on trustworthiness judgements and audiences willingness to accept influencer information
Jin and Ryu 2020
influencer group photos induce stronger parasocial interactions, compared to selfies which induce stronger envy
instagram influencers are percieved as more trustworthy, evoke more envy and induce closer parasocial interactions than mainstream celebrities
only in female ppts, no effect on males