Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Wait-To-Fail Model
You have to wait and see if the person’s achievement will be less than their potential, but at that point the person has already failed
They are missed or diagnosed
They compensate in other ways so their disability isn’t disabling
People don’t want to say that LD is the sole reason for problems or difficulties
Reasons That People With LD Aren’t Diagnosed
The Behavioralists
Didn’t like the processing approach because it says you should address a problem you can’t observe with a mechanism you can’t see
In contrast, the behavioralists were very concrete and into observation
Specific learning disorder
specific neurological disorders that affect the brain’s ability to store, process, or communicate information
Phineas Gage
A railroad worker who survived a severe brain injury in 1848, leading to changes in his personality and behavior, contributing to our understanding of neuroplasticity and the brain's role in behavior
Learned from his case that the frontal lobe is connected to behaviors and memory
Aphasia
Loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage
Studied by Frans Josef Gall
Franz Joseph Gall
Studied Aphasia
Was able to discover that the brain has different portions for different functions
Later fell out of favor because he became heavily involved with phrenology (skull reading)
Worked with patients who couldn’t understand or communicate through speech even though they were otherwise cognitively typical
Paul Broca
French physician who discovered Broca's area in the brain, an area in the left temporal lobe responsible for speech production
Broca’s Aphasia
Non-verbal aphasia
Someone with this condition has something to say but just can’t get it out
Non-fluent speech, few words, short sentences out of sequence, many pauses, mono-pitch, comprehension is intact
First time specific deficit was linked with specific area of the brain
Carl Wernicke
Neurologist who located a speech are in a different part of the left temporal lobe that, when damaged, can impact auditory and written word comprehension
Wernicke’s Aphasia
Impaired language comprehension
Loss of comprehension of spoken language
Despite this impaired comprehension, speech may have a normal rate, rhythm, and grammar
Distortion of articulate speech
Word memory intact
Speech remains fluent
Sir William Broadbent
Neurologist who was one of the first scientists to describe individuals who couldn’t read but who had no apparent cognitive or motor defects
Adolph Kussmaul
Physician who coined the term “Wortblindheit” (wordblindness)
William Pringle Morgan
General practitioner who wrote the first academic paper on congenital word blindness about a kid who couldn’t learn to read in school
He didn’t think that word blindness was from an accident or damage because the kid was born with it
James Hinshelwood
First physician to write and advocate for a specific educational approach to word blindness
Wrote about an inability to accurately interpret what the eyes are seeing
Meaning, the eyes are working fine, it’s just the brain is unable to process it correctly
Word Blindness
An old-fashioned term used to mean that a person is unable to recognize and understand words that he sees
Dyslexia before dyslexia
Rudolph Berlin
Ophthalmologist who coined the term “dyslexia”
Said that there’s a similarity between people who have word blindness and people who have brain injuries or birth defects
But he also said that word blindness could run in families, which means that it must not be an injury, because injuries can’t be inherited
Samuel Orton
Neurologist who believed that neither side of the brain was completely in control
Believed that dominance of one brain hemisphere over another was the cause of learning disabilities
He “proved” this by saying that kids with dyslexia have trouble learning their left from their right
Emphasized phonics
Coined the term strephosymbolia
Some, but not all, people with dyslexia have this
Shifted the field of LD from looking at the causes of LD, to focusing on identifying people with LD and trying to help them with their challenges
Strephosymbolia
When letters are seen backwards
Mixed Laterality
Most people are able to distinguish pretty clearly between the left and right sides of their bodies, but this happens when a person doesn't favor the same side of the body for a dominant hand, foot, eye and ear
Samuel Kirk
Psychologist who coined the term “learning disabilities”
Was at a conference with parents of children with certain mental issues in 1963, suggested that they should use the term learning disabilities, and focus on what’s the problem and how should it be addressed rather than the causes
Was hired by the government to reshape the definition of learning disabilities (over Bateman)
Brushing
A way to organize the sensory system of those with ADHD
Process Approach
In order to identify a learning disability, you have to understand the process behind the disability
Looking at LD as neurological deficiency and not an academic deficiency
J McVicker Hunt
Published a book called “Intelligence and Experience” in 1961, and he looked at the impact of experience on brain development
His work was based on the work of Robert Tryon
Robert Tryon
Took mice and separated them by the best and worst results of their maze runs, and then bred them
Bred “maze bright” and “maze dumb” mice
First generation: normal distribution
Eighth generation: bimodal curve
Tenth generation: no overlap
Conclusion: maze learning ability (intelligence?) is hereditary
Hebb and Hymovitch
Raised mice in 4 environment variations
Free environment (perceptual and motor)
Small mesh cage (perceptual)
Running wheels (motor)
Stovepipe cages (neither perceptual nor motor)
Concluded that 1 and 2 were basically the same, as well as 3 and 4 - however, 1 and 2 were much better than 3 and 4
Conclusion: perceptual enrichment has an effect on maze learning (intelligence?), while the motor enrichment not so much
Experiment seemed to show that environment has a big impact on learning
Cooper and Zubek
Replicated Tryon and raised mice like Hebb and Hymovitch
Combined the smart and dumb mice experiment and the cage-type experiment, except for the motor part because the motor part didn’t show any effect
Found that in a normal environment the smart mice do better than the dumb mice - but in a restricted environment the smart and dumb mice did the same, and in the enriched environment they did about the same
Conclusion: genetic factors only apply to specific environments and tell us nothing about how those people would achieve in other environments
Concluded that genetic factors are a variable, NOT a determinant
The environment tends to wipe out any innate genetic differences
Dyspedagogia
Poor teaching or lack of good teaching
5 Components of Kirk’s Definition
Subaverage achievement
Intra-individual differences
Reference to psychological processing problems as causal factors
Suggestion of cerebral dysfunction as a possible causal factor
Exclusionary factors
NACHC (US Dept. of Ed.) Definition of Learning Disabilities
Big change added to this definition was the addition of “children”
PL 94-142
Originated in 1977
Originally called “education for all handicapped children”
The law that guarantees a free appropriate public education to every child in America
This is why people with disabilities get educated in schools
Barbara Bateman
Her definition of learning disabilities: “Children with learning disabilities are those who manifest an educationally significant discrepancy between their estimated intellectual potential and their actual level of performance related to the basic disorders in the learning process”
Learning Disabilities
Specific challenges in different areas of academics and school related executive functions
Intellectual Disabilities
IQ below 70
Adaptive deficits
Develops before age of 22
Splinter Skills vs. Talents
People with disabilities may excel in one specific area (Savant syndrome), but it is akin to a neurotypical person having a talent
Averagarian Thinking
The tendency to judge people against a norm or a average
Ergodic Theory
The theory that you can’t figure out anything about the individual by looking at the average of the group
The Matthew Effect
The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer
NJCLD (National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities) Definition of LD, 1981
Definition is a little less specific but more or less the same as the definition that has been used
LDA (Association for Children with Learning Disabilities) Definition of LD, 1986
Very broad definition of LD
Added the idea of a non-verbal disability
Changed their name to include not just children
OSEP Statement, 2001 (Office of Special Education Programs)
This statement defining learning disabilities indicated that in 2001, people were still speaking as if the very existence of LD was being debated
DSM-5-TR Definition of LD
Added different levels of severity to the definition of LD:
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Dysnomia
Impairs an individual’s ability to recall words, names, or objects
Neurological Soft Signs
Peculiar and minor abnormalities that nobody knew where they came from but they knew that something was wrong
Ptosis
Drooping of upper eyelid
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Uses magnets to look at the brain’s water content
Allows doctors to distinguish between normal brain tissue and “something else”
Positive Emission Tomography (PET)
Doctors use special dye with radioactive tracers that are absorbed by different parts of the body, and the areas with more chemical activity going on have more of the dye
This shows which parts of the brain are more active
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Shows metabolism of the brain
Measures what parts of the brain are being used during a task
In normal people, used to show difference of brain activity between adolescents and adults
Homunculus
A figurative representation, in distorted human form, of the relative sizes of the sensory areas in the brain that correspond to particular sensory parts of the body
The bigger the portion, the more sensitive the body part
Lissencephaly
Smooth brain
Caused by not having grooves on the brain
Fissures
Largest grooves in the brain that separate the different lobes
Cerebellum
Beneath cerebral cortex and is what joins it to the brainstem
Makes up about 10% of brain mass but has about 50% of neurons
Regulates behaviors having to do with movement, speech, balance, etc.
Executive Functions
The ability to regulate one’s behavior through working memory, inner speech, control of emotions and arousal levels, and analysis of problems and communication of problem solutions to others
A term used to describe a person’s thinking about his or her thinking and learning process (metacognition)
Frontal lobes are responsible for this
Lobotomy
Cure of emotional disturbances by severing connection between prefrontal lobe and the rest of the brain
Was used to try and control violence
Created by Egas Moniz
Prefrontal Lobe
Appears to play a critical role in the uniquely human capacity to modulate emotions
Acts as a manager of emotions by regulating and weighing reactions before acting on them
Frontal Lobe
Responsible for higher cognitive functions such as memory, personality traits, impulse control, problem solving, social interaction, and motor function
Parietal Lobe
Part of the brain responsible for processing sensory information, spatial awareness, and interpreting visual information
Located at the top of the brain
People with damage here have trouble taking in information and processing it
Face Blindness
Those who do not recognize faces as visual stimuli
Occipital Lobe
Located at the back of the brain
Responsible for processing visual information such as colors, shapes, and movements
Damage can result in visual agnosia
Visual Agnosia
Inability to perceive or recognize common objects despite normal vision
Temporal Lobe
Contains Broca' and Wernicke’s areas
Region in the brain responsible for processing auditory information, memory, reception, and language
Neurons
Brain cells responsible for sending and receiving information in the brain
Canavan Disease
Leukodystrophy
Destruction of the white matter of the brain
Causes profound intellectual disability due to the lack of a certain enzyme
Hereditary
Teratogenic
Medical
Environmental
Factors that may contribute to neurological dysfunction
Familiality
When a condition occurs at a greater-than-chance rate in family relatives
Implies correlation
Heritability
The degree to which a condition is genetically transmitted
Implies causation
Colorado Reading Project
Study that found that 54% of monozygotic twins vs 32% of dizygotic twins shared a learning disability
FMR Gene
Stands for Fragile X Mental Retardation Gene
Located on the end of the X chromosome
Mutations can lead to Fragile X Syndrome
Fragile X Syndrome
FMR gene is dangling and looks like it will fall off
Has a lot of distinct features (ex. long face)
Is #1 cause of autism worldwide
Is often mistaken for autism
Neurofibromatosis
Occurs in 1 in 3-4,000 births
Categorized by growth of tumors and marks on skin - cafe au lait spots
Tumors are non-cancerous, but they can cause problems
About 50% of people with this have learning disabilities
Human Genome Project
We can look at the genome and compare the genes of people with various conditions, or compare other factors
Chromosomes 6 and 15
Chromosomes on which we find the marker for dyslexia
Joseph Merrick
Known as the “elephant” due to his severe physical deformities
Teratogenic Factor
Factors that come from an outside source
Examples:
Illicit drug use
Nicotine use
Teratogen
An abnormal growth or malfunction in the fetus
Medical Factors
Medical causes of brain dysfunction that could occur either prenatal, perinatal, or postnatal
Primary prevention (targets everyone)
Secondary prevention (targets at-risk)
Tertiary prevention (treatment)
Three types of prevention of learning disabilities
KTEA-3
Test that tests for learning disabilities
An individually-administered measure of academic achievement across multiple areas for individuals in different age ranges
Primary Prevention
Efforts that society makes that keeps something from happening
Targets the whole population to avoid a negative outcome
Secondary Prevention
Efforts that are aimed at catching problems early and stopping them right away
Tends to look at at-risk groups
Tertiary Prevention
Essentially treatment
Trying to take a problem that exists and preventing it from getting worse
CLD
Cultural and linguistic diversity
Teachers have to be aware of the cultural difference in their classrooms
Temperament
A behavioral style of responding to people and situations, present from birth
Brazelton Test
Tests for temperament in neonatal children, 0-30
Predicts how they will be further in life
Usually can’t change temperament
Readiness Skills
The skills that are not innately academic but are the skills needed in order to succeed academically
Also known as pre-academic skills
Generic approach
Specific approach
Two approaches for early identification of learning disabilities
Generic Approach
Looking at people who have challenges and looking at them as in need of services without differentiating individual learning disabilities
Better for earlier in life
Specific Approach
Identifying a child’s specific area of impairment - the specific difficulties they’re having
Better for a bit later on in life
Response to Intervention Model (RTI)
Three-tier model that gives everyone services
Those who respond will get more services, and if they still don’t respond then it will be thought that they have a learning disability
A way to avoid achievement-intelligence gap, which is a “wait-to-fail” model
Best practice to use for children with disabilities
Looks at how children respond to interventions for learning disabilities
Peter Principle
The theory that you are continuously promoted to the level of your incompetence until you hit a block, and that is where you stay
Tier 1: universal interventions (primary)
Tier 2: individualized interventions (secondary)
Tier 3: intensive interventions (tertiary)
RTI three-tier pyramid of interventions
Tier 1: Universal Interventions (Primary)
Available to all students in a classroom or school
Can consist of whole-group or individual strategies or supports
Core instructional interventions
All students
Preventative
Proactive
Tier 2: Individualized Interventions (Secondary)
Subset of students receive interventions targeting specific needs
Targeted group interventions
Some students (at-risk)
High efficiency
Rapid response
Tier 3: intensive interventions (tertiary)
Students who are non-responders to tiers 1 and 2 are referred to the RTI team for more intensive interventions
Intensive, individualized interventions
Individual students
Higher intensity
Longer duration
Curriculum-Based Measurement
A method teachers use to find out how students are progressing in basic academic areas such as math, reading, writing, and spelling through 1-2 minute assessments
Can be helpful to parents because it provides current, week-by-week information on the progress that their children are making
Shown to have better outcomes than other assessments
Based on student performance, and shows the efficacy of teacher’s teaching method, which allows them to assess and restructure their curriculum accordingly
Twice-Exceptional People
Have a learning disability
Academically gifted (IQ over 130)
Concordance-Discordance Model
Model based on diagnosis rather than testing
Measures actual cognitive processing strengths and weaknesses
Should be a significant difference between a person’s cognitive strengths and weaknesses
If academic achievement is too low for your processing strength, there is discordance
There should be correlation between processing weakness and poor academic achievement
Discrepancy/Consistency Model
There must be (we are testing for):
Discrepancy between high and low processing scores
Discrepancy between high processing and low academic achievement
Consistency between low processing scores and low academic achievement
Metacognition
A student’s ability to think about, preplan, and monitor performance on an educational task
Thinking about thinking
Two different ways to look at it:
Source of disability
Treatment for disability
Stop Skill
When you have the feeling or urge to do something, and you have the ability to fend it off and say no to it
S: Stop
T: Take a step back
O: Observe the situation
P: Proceed mindfully