Development II

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/38

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

39 Terms

1
New cards

development of vision from birth to 6 years (2)

When a child is born their vision is very poor relative to an adults

As long as development is not hindered by disease or other possible dysfunction (squints etc.) it gradually develops over the first 6 years of life.

2
New cards

when does visual acuity reach adult levels

  • Our acuity steadily improves approaching adult levels by ~4-5 years

  • roughly adult like by 5-6 years old

3
New cards

expected average VA based on age of children from 1 month - 4 years old

Age (months)

Test Distance (cm)

Mean Acuity (cycles/deg)

VA (Snellen approx)

1

38

0.94

6/191

1.5

38

1.11

6/162

2.5

38

2.16

6/83

4

38

2.68

6/67

6

55

5.65

6/30

9

55

6.79

6/26

12

55

6.42

6/28

18

55

8.59

6/21

24

55

9.57

6/18

30

55

11.52

6/15

36

84

21.81

6/8

48

84

24.81

6/7

  • good to learn this table roughly for every 6 months - will be useful clinically

4
New cards

explain the problems that arise with measuring VA in children (3)

Children’s acuity does however vary with the test, and cooperation of the child!

The important thing is to have a rough idea of what it should be and compare the patient in your chair to suggested norms.

Of extra importance – do both eyes see equally well - if they don’t - why is that

5
New cards

explain the contrast sensitivity function in children compared to adults and how it progresses over time (4)

  • In childhood contrast sensitivity is reduced compared to an adult, particularly at mid and high SFs

  • Contrast sensitivity shows a pronounced increase in the first two years of life

  • 0-8 months - very significantly low CSF - as VA is very limited - cannot see high SFs 

  • Immaturity of the retina (and cortex) in young children has been suggested as a reason for the differences

6
New cards

at what age does CSF reach adult levels

approximately 7-10 years

7
New cards

explain the development of colour vision from birth onwards (4)

Colour vision at birth is poor.

Studies suggest that newborn babies can discriminate red, but other colours aren’t reliably seen until about 2-3 months of age - which is why young babies like looking at B&W patterns 

It is suggested that a baby’s red-green colour pathway develops first, followed by the blue-yellow pathway a few months later. However, colours still need to be highly saturated to be detected.

Discrimination of desaturated colours may not reach adult levels until late adolescence

8
New cards

explain the development of BV and stereopsis from birth onwards (3)

Eye movement control has been shown to improve with age (and is better initially for static rather than kinetic stimuli).

Sensitivity to retinal disparity (depth/responding to 3D stimuli) rapidly improves from about 12-16 weeks of age (and is not necessarily linked to eye alignment). It is thought that cortical development is the limiting factor in binocular function prior to this.

Very young babies may exhibit exotropia which later disappears (after 6 months if not gone needs to be investigated), although the vast majority of children are born orthotropic.

9
New cards

describe the pattern of refractive error throughout childhood + what is the reason for this pattern (3)

  • Mean refractive error typically declines throughout childhood

  • start off hypermetropic - gradually become less hypermetropic as we age throughout early childhood years

  • this is due to emmetropisation

10
New cards

explain the term emmetropisaton (3)

  • In early childhood, the eye (through either a passive or active process) is attempting to reach emmetropia

  • It is growing in such a way that the combined optic power of the lens and cornea is tending towards a refractive error of 0.00DS (or low hyperopia)

  • SN: One of the biggest questions, is whether emmetropisation is a passive process guided by genetics, or whether it is influenced by environment

11
New cards

describe the shift in mean rx from birth to 3 years old (2)

At birth the distribution is largely gaussian (normally distributed) with a mean refractive error of around +2.00DS

By 3 years old the mean refractive error has shifted to around +0.75DS with a smaller standard deviation

12
New cards

describe the distribution of rx in adults (in comparison to children/from birth) (2)

  • The distribution of refractive errors in adults shows a leptokurtotic distribution - (tall peak with more variation in the tails than a ‘normal distribution’)

  • there is a much greater distribution in the centre (0) as most people are emmetropic and then there are longer tails as more variation) 

13
New cards

describe how eye growth was used to explain the theory of emmetropisation (3)

  • the eye grows from around 16.5mm at birth to 24mm as an adult – therefore there must be an increase in axial length

  • a study suggested that an increase of 0.35mm increases a myopic prescription by 1.00DS - so as the eye is growing it is becoming more myopic/less hypermetropic 

  • however - this is not seen during early childhood! - and according to the above that = to 21D change - this is therefore NOT the reason for emmetropisation occurring 

14
New cards

in terms of emmetropisation being a passive process - what does this mean and what are the 3 proposed mechanisms for this - explain each one 

  • suggests that emmetropisation is a result of the natural growth and development of the eye – changes that could be said to be “pre-programmed”

  • 1.Anterior chamber depth – this increases during childhood reaching adult levels by around 15 years. However, changes don’t appear to have a large role in changing refractive error.

  • 2.Corneal power / curvature – data is equivocal in terms of the role it plays, some show a steepening of the radius of curvature whilst others show a flattening. Likely a very minor role compared to the…

  • 3.Crystalline lens – this is thought to be largely responsible for the overall decrease in the refractive error as the eye grows/elongates. Research suggests that as the eye gets bigger it stretches the lens. This makes it thinner and reduces its dioptric power 

15
New cards

explain the theory of emmetropisation being driven by an ACTIVE process (5)

  • emmetropisation is mediated by retinal blur - we can control this (with lenses) 

  • Animal studies have used convex / concave lenses or form deprivation lenses during early life to simulate high refractive error / retinal blur

  • The eye deprived of clear visual input grows excessively becoming myopic

  • Interestingly if the goggles are removed the eye growth halts until the animal becomes emmetropic – suggests that myopic defocus is somehow “detected” and compensated for

  • High powered lenses of opposite powers (+ or -) can induce different types of retinal blur in each eye, and result in differing amounts of compensatory eye growth 

16
New cards

why is understanding the theory of emmetropisation relevant in correcting and understanding rx in young children (3)

It is important to consider possible barriers to emmetropisation – conditions that deprive eye completely of vision – eye becomes more myopic

We should expect to see some degree of refractive error in very young children – as still tending to emmetropisation

It is not always necessary to correct refractive errors in very young children (unless they have a strabismus etc.) – as we can disrupt emmetropisation – children may never become emmetropic (just monitor instead)

17
New cards

what else develops as well as emmetropisation that we have to consider 

  • development of myopia !!! 

  • By 2040 the global prevalence of myopia in children and teenagers is estimated to reach 36% (that’s 1 in 3), and is steadily rising

18
New cards

explain the factors that contribute to development of myopia in young children (5)

  • genetics

  • time spent doing near work

  • and possibly even exposure to sunlight/outdoors 

  • The same retinal feedback mechanism that is thought to detect retinal blur and induce emmetropia (through a compensatory mechanism) is thought to be partly responsible for the development of myopia in young people

  • For example, when we focus on something close our accommodation system often demonstrates a small error (lag of accommodation), which causes hyperopic defocus on the retina (little bit of blur). This is thought to induce eye growth and ultimately myopia.

19
New cards

explain how correcting myopia can also contribute to myopic development (2)

  • Unfortunately, the concave lenses used to manage myopia (single vision lenses) also create peripheral hyperopic defocus, which is thought to contribute to myopia progression - exacerbates myopia 

  • Strategies to overcome this and halt myopia progression are a major focus for research - CLs, different types of lens design, drops etc. - we cannot STOP myopia progression but can reduce it potentially 

20
New cards

why is myopia development a problem (2)

  • px with myopia - particularly high myopia (as eye is longer than normal - stretching retina and other structures making them thinner and weaker

  • are at greater risk of conditions like: retinal detachment, glaucoma, AMD, choroidal neovascularisation etc. 

21
New cards

describe the overall shift in rx from birth to early and late childhood depending on different factors (4)

  • in the early years of life we see this shift towards emmetropisation

  • from around 6 years old we start to see changing distributions of refractive error depending on factors such as race/ethnicity/geographic location

  • For example, if we compare Australian children with Japanese children of the same age, there are more myopes in the Japanese cohort.

  • The prevalence of myopia can vary hugely from ~2% in 10 year old Norwegian children to ~55% in 10 year old Chinese children

22
New cards

describe the risk factors of myopia (4)

  • Children who spend more time outdoors (e.g. doing sports or outdoor activities) are less likely to develop myopia – mechanism not fully understood but could be linked to light increasing dopamine production (which may inhibit eye growth)

  • Children who perform prolonged near work (e.g. reading for >30mins continuously) or with a short working distance are more likely to become myopic (although some studies have found no link – so inconclusive?

  • Racial and ethnic differences in myopia prevalence exist – highest in east Asians (intense educational pressures?)

  • Hundreds of genes have now been associated with myopia, and these can be inherited. Having two parents with myopia is associated with a greater risk than one parent with myopia (which is a higher risk than no parents with myopia).

23
New cards

describe what amblyopia is (3)

  • Diminished visual acuity that does not result from any demonstrable anomaly of the eye or visual pathway and cannot be corrected with refractive correction”

  • poor vision resulting from a cortical visual impairment - inadequate stimulation of the visual system during the critical period of visual development

  • may be unilateral/bilateral 

24
New cards

how do we clinically define amblyopia

a “two line” difference in acuity between the eyes – one eye is 6/6 and one eye is 6/9 or 6/12

25
New cards

prevalence of amblyopia 

  • affects 1-3% of children in the UK 

26
New cards

what is commonly / uncommonly associated with amblyopia in children

  • commonly associated with: heterotropia and/or uncorrected anisometropia (significant difference in rx between 2 eyes) in children and can have serious implications for their vision

  • uncommonly associated with: being caused by visual deprivation due to congenital cataract, ptosis etc… 

27
New cards

explain what the critical period of visual development is in relation to amblyopia (4)

  • time period from birth to around 7-8 years old

  • during this time that the visual neurons in the brain are still ‘malleable’ (susceptible to change) - any problems during this period can be significant - Therefore the ‘critical period’ could be described as the time frame in which visual deprivation is effective in causing amblyopia

  • Beyond ~7-8 years old the visual system has matured, and is now in the state that it will remain in through adulthood. Visual deprivation after this age typically doesn’t have any detrimental effects on acuity

  • example: if someone got a cataract at 20 years old and it was removed after this their vision will be fine - however if a baby was born with a cataract as it is within this critical period time even after removal they will likely develop amblyopia 

28
New cards

explain what ocular dominance columns are in relation to typical visual development (5)

  • this is a type of specialisation of cells in V1

  • it is the separation of neurons into ocular dominance columns – where each cell has a preference for input from one particular eye

  • This occurs because (in normal development) there is equal competition from both eyes for dominance – so both eyes become equally represented in the brain

  • Around 80% of neurons are “binocular”, leaving 20% to respond solely to input from one eye

  • Put simply, if a RE dominant cell receives a signal from the LE it will completely ignore it – there is no response, no change in firing rate.

29
New cards

explain the effect of visual deprivation on ocular dominance columns (4)

  • depriving one eye of visual input at a young age causes physical changes in the brain

  • If an animal is deprived of sight in one eye from a young age (e.g. suturing the eyelid closed, or an occlusive contact lens) - the neurons undergo a change in function and begin to only respond to signals from the “good” eye (i.e. they are no longer binocular) - no longer any competition between 2 eyes and neurons for the other eye no longer develop 

  • A loss of stereopsis is thought to follow

  • Shrinkage of ocular dominance columns is greatest when animals are monocularly deprived at a younger age - cataract at birth vs age 5 - worse case of amblyopia at birth, mild amblyopia at 5 years 

30
New cards

why do strabismus and anisometropia cause amblyopia

  • they both cause a deprivation of some sort

  • Strabismus early in life leads to the inhibition of the signal from the deviated eye (suppression to prevent diplopia) - however dampens cellular response - like a form of monocular deprivation - so develop amblyopia 

  • uncorrected anisometropia causes a type of deprivation in the affected eye (blurred retinal image results in little to no high spatial frequencies being seen) - differing amount of retinal blur on each retina - lose signal for brain to develop neurons for specialisation - so develop amblyopia 

31
New cards

compare the effects of strabismic amblyopia vs anisometropic amblyopia (and mixed)

  • anisometropic amblyopes not only had reduced acuity but also poorer contrast sensitivity

  • whereas strabismic amblyopes showed only reduced acuity

  • Mixed amblyopes had the poorest functional vision.

32
New cards

summarize the causes of amblyopia

Resulting in suppression (due to a difficulty fusing, or rivalry), followed by amblyopia: 

  • Strabismus (heterotropia)  - will not be picked up unless tested in an eye examination 

  • Uncorrected refractive error: 

Anisometropia

High Rx - blurry retinal image 

Astigmatism (meridional)

types of stimulus deprivation:

  • Congenital cataract

  • Ptosis

  • Corneal scar(trauma)

33
New cards

explain how the age of the child affects amblyopia developing following visual deprivation (3)

  • The younger the child, the more quickly amblyopia develops following visual deprivation

  • Roughly speaking, the age of the child tells you how many weeks of deprivation would cause amblyopia (up to the age of 5 years), for example:

A 1 year old child would develop amblyopia after one week of visual deprivation

A 4 year old child would develop amblyopia after four weeks of visual deprivation

  • The longer the period of deprivation, the more dense the amblyopia

34
New cards

clinically what do we need to be aware of with amblyopia (3)

When testing young children you must always be on the lookout for amblyopia

If detected, it is vital to try and establish the cause

Treatment (reversal?) of amblyopia is really only possible until the child is ~7 years old, so it is a time critical condition - brain has matured and also the fact that some children will not want to wear an eye patch etc.

35
New cards

how do we treat amblyopia 

  • eye patch - covering up the good eye

  • px has to wear for a few hours of the day

  • successful treatment leads to 6/12 vision, 6/6 if lucky and strict motivation to the regime 

36
New cards

what tests make up our clinical investigation/diagnosis of amblyopia (5)

Case history and observation - look for clues. Do they have a heterotropia? Significant anisometropia? Ptosis? Media opacities? Family history? 

Cover test – is there a heterotropia (strabismus?)

Retinoscopy – is there significant anisometropia or a high Rx?

Ophthalmoscopy – there should be no other obvious cause of poor vision - amblyopic eye should look healthy 

Pinhole – confirm that visual acuity doesn’t improve (reduces aberrations and can therefore indicate if there is residual uncorrected refractive error) - pinhole shouldn’t improve vision if px has amblyopia 

SN: if you do suspect/know that a px has amblyopia do not ignore the affected eye - problems can still develop in this eye 

37
New cards

explain the use of neutral density filter in investigating amblyopia

Neutral density filter – acuity is normally diminished when a neutral density filter is introduced, yet in amblyopia acuity remains similar to without the filter

38
New cards

what is the crowding effect (2)

  • Patients with amblyopia typically perform better on single letters rather than when reading the whole chart (or a single letter flanked by bars)

  • Letters surrounded by other letters or bars are more ‘crowded’

39
New cards

explain the relevance of the crowding effect to amblyopia investigation (3)

  • Px with amblyopia – do worse on a crowded chart than charts with a single letter - measuring VA on a single letter chart will underestimate vision loss in amblyopia 

  • so we need to always use a crowded chart when testing vision in children especially – as can miss the amblyopia

  • SN: The crowding effect is less pronounced in anisometropic amblyopes, and more obvious in strabismic amblyopes

Explore top flashcards

Muscle Practical II
Updated 955d ago
flashcards Flashcards (78)
Health Unit 4
Updated 1054d ago
flashcards Flashcards (79)
Vocab #13
Updated 986d ago
flashcards Flashcards (20)
AP HUG MOD 53-55(?)
Updated 263d ago
flashcards Flashcards (34)
Parts of the Brain
Updated 960d ago
flashcards Flashcards (38)
Muscle Practical II
Updated 955d ago
flashcards Flashcards (78)
Health Unit 4
Updated 1054d ago
flashcards Flashcards (79)
Vocab #13
Updated 986d ago
flashcards Flashcards (20)
AP HUG MOD 53-55(?)
Updated 263d ago
flashcards Flashcards (34)
Parts of the Brain
Updated 960d ago
flashcards Flashcards (38)