Logical Arguments and Fallacies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/29

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key concepts, definitions, and types of arguments and fallacies in logic.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

30 Terms

1
New cards

Deductive Argument

An argument where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.

2
New cards

Valid Deductive Argument

A deductive argument in which, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

3
New cards

Invalid Deductive Argument

A deductive argument where the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises.

4
New cards

Sound Argument

A valid deductive argument that has true premises.

5
New cards

Unsound Argument

A valid deductive argument where not all premises are true.

6
New cards

Slippery Slope

Arguing against a proposed action by claiming it will lead to a series of bad consequences.

7
New cards

Composition Fallacy

Inferring that a whole has a property merely because its parts have that property.

8
New cards

Division Fallacy

Inferring that a part has a property merely because the whole has that property.

9
New cards

Begging the Question

A circular argument in which the proposition is assumed in one of the premises.

10
New cards

Equivocation Fallacy

Using a word with two different meanings in the premises and/or conclusion.

11
New cards

Appeal to Ignorance

Using the absence of proof as evidence for the truth of the opposing proposition.

12
New cards

Diversion Fallacy

Supporting one proposition by diverting attention to another issue.

13
New cards

Ad Hominem

Using negative traits of a speaker as evidence that their statement is false.

14
New cards

Appeal to Authority

Citing an authority's statement as evidence for the truth of a proposition without proper credibility.

15
New cards

False Dichotomy

Excluding relevant possibilities without justification.

16
New cards

Post Hoc Fallacy

Assuming that because one event preceded another, it caused the second event.

17
New cards

Hasty Generalization

Inferring a general proposition from an inadequate sample of particular cases.

18
New cards

Accident Fallacy

Applying a generalization to a special case that is an exception.

19
New cards

Necessary Condition

A requirement that must be met for something else to be true.

20
New cards

Sufficient Condition

A condition that guarantees the outcome is true on its own.

21
New cards

Subjectivism

Concluding that a proposition is true because one wants or believes it to be true.

22
New cards

Appeal to Majority

Using the belief of a large number of people as evidence that a proposition is true.

23
New cards

Appeal to Emotion

Trying to persuade someone to accept a proposition based on emotional responses.

24
New cards

Appeal to Force

Trying to get someone to accept a proposition based on a threat.

25
New cards

Inductive Argument

An argument with premises that suggest the conclusion is likely true.

26
New cards

Inductive vs Deductive Argument

Inductive arguments are likely true; deductive arguments guarantee the conclusion.

27
New cards

Strong Inductive Argument

An argument where the conclusion is likely to be true given the premises.

28
New cards

Weak Inductive Argument

An argument where the conclusion is not probable even if the premises are true.

29
New cards

Cogent Inductive Argument

An inductive argument that has good reasoning and true premises.

30
New cards

Uncogent Argument

An inductive argument where one or more premises are false.