1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
why was collectivisation introduced? - LINKS W INDUSTRY
Fear of invasion convinced party members of need to industrialise. Modern economic base seen as essential to defend USSR, against Capitalist powers
Industrialisation would lead to population increase in cities relying on imported food supplies so agricultural productivity would need to increase
Soviet Union would need food surpluses as foreign exports to import new tech
Mechanisation of agriculture to support industry- labour needed in industrial centres
Stalin saw forced collectivisation as a solution to increase food production
why introduced? ECONOMIC ARGUEMENTS
Peasant-plot agriculture was inefficient compared to rest of Europe. Most farms owned by peasant households, piecemeal distribution
Collective farms = larger economic scale- larger units make use of machinery more viable
Use of machinery increases food production
Reduce labour requirements release labour onto growing industrial plants
Why introduced? POLITICAL MOTIVES
Extend socialism to the countryside, ensure survival of the revolution. Party control in rural areas was weak- support had declined since Tambov 1921
NEP and Land decree 1917 unintentionally gave peasants private property
Provided opportunity to get rid of richer ‘kulaks’. In eyes of communists, they hoarded food, preventing industrial revolution
Pressure on govt to ride countryside of ‘Capitalist’ class
By 1928, Stalin was convinced that peasants were holding back industrial progress
Ideologically - abolish private property
process of collectivisation
Dec 1927- 15th party congress decided on programme of voluntary collectivisation
1928- Food shortages led govt to carry out forced requisitioning of grain as a temporary measure
1929- Stalin began to talk of ‘liquidating’ kulaks as a class
Local party officials went into villages to persuade peasants of the advantages of collective farms ‘Kolkhoz’ with promises of increased mechanisation (MTS- Machine and tractor stations) & advice on farming methods
Once enough peasants signed up for a collective they could seize animals, grain supplies and buildings as the property of the collective
Collectivisation
Introduced in 1929.
Farms forcibly merged
Equipment taken away from richer peasants and given to the poorer.
Peasants who worked in collective farms were allowed to keep a small proportion of grain to live off of.
Rest of the food used to feed workers in the city or sold abroad to fund industrialisation
Reaction to collectivisation
Violent opposition e.g Ukraine and Caucasus region
Kulaks set fire to farms and slaughtered animsals
party officials murdered on arrival
De-kulakisation squads were sent in
Party members were sent from the cities to forcibly organise collectives
OGPU and Red Army used to quell unrest
1930- Stalin temporarily backed down with his article ‘DIZZY WITH SUCCESS’ which blamed overzealous party officials for excesses and concessions give to peasants e.g own garden plot
Only temporary- long enough to allow next harvest
by 1932- 62% of peasant households had been collectivised rising to 93% in 1937
Peasants responded to requisitioning/Collectivisation by destroying their crops, animals and machinery.
Many peasants would prefer to destroy over help the government.
Stalin’s policies led to the destruction of:
17 Million horses
26 Million cattle
11 Million pigs
60 Million Sheep and goats.
Liquidation of Kulaks- squads
‘de-kulakisation’ squads - so called ‘Twenty-five thousands’ sent into countryside to force the peasants into collectives. In this way, kulaks would be eliminated. In practice, dekulakisation covered a range of methods for eliminating the Kulaks, including murder. ‘Active’ kulaks most violently persecuted
Famine 1932-33
Collectivisation led to famine in the Ukraine
Ukrainian farmers were often unable to meet government targets for farm production
Resistance to collectivisation had been at it’s fiercest in the Ukraine.
Stalin punished the farmers by seizing their grain and livestock.
Used famine to end resistance in the Ukraine- 4-5million died
Although he was offered support internationally, declined.
Grain procurement
Collectivisation allowed the government to procure more grain than the NEP in 1928.
In 1928, the government procured 10.8 million tons of grain from the peasants.
Which rose to 22.6 million by 1933
Grain export rose too from 1 million – 4.7 million from 1928-1930.
Economic consequences
Supply of machinery to collectives was slow and many were without tractors until mid 1930s
Removal of the kulaks was damaging as often most productive farmers
Slaughtering of animals by the kulaks caused a serious reduction in livestock leading to a shortage of meat and milk
Grain production fell declining from 7.3million in 1928 to 67.6 million in 1934
Give seized food for export to gain foreign exchange
Widespread famine 32-33 particularly affecting the Ukraine, Kazhakhstan and the Caucasus
Political consquences
Stalin achieved his aim of ‘liquidating the kulak class
Party control was imposed over a reluctant peasant population
in 1930, the mir was abolished and replaced by the Kolkhoz administration , headed by a chairman who was a party member from the town
Party control usually extended by use of teenagers, members of communist youth organisation, who used wooden watchtowers to spy on peasants in the fields to ensure they did not steal food to feed their families
Ideologically socialist- ended private ownership within peasantry
Social consequences
peasants started to move into the towns in search of food, until the govt introduced a passport system to prevent peasants from leaving the collectives
They became tied to the collective in a system that began to partly resemble serfdom
Unable to move from the collective, some peasants resorted to eating their own children in order to survive
Roy Medvedev estimates around 10 million peasants dispossessed 1929-32