Rights in context

Why are human rights referred to as “soft law”

* it is not always possible to enforce human rights os they are referred to as “soft law”

Why are civil liberties referred to as “hard law’

They are the rights of individuals that are legally enforceable and represent “hard law”

How are human rights protected in the UK if there is no constitution ?

* Constitutionally significant landmark events
* Common law cases
* Acts of parliament

What type of rights do citizens in the Uk tend to have?

Because we have no constitution we have negative/residual rights- everything that is not forbidden belongs to our rights.

What did manga carter establish in 1215?

* Right to a free and fair trial

What did the Bill of rights 1689 establish ?

a constitutional monarchy bound by law

What did Somerset V Stewart 1772 establish?

Elimination of slavery - set the precedent

What did Erick V carringotn 1765 establish ?

Government can only act acceding to thr law protecting the rights of citizens from despotic rule

What did the representation of the peoples act 1928 establish ?

Universal suffrage

Why has their been a development in rights based culture since 1997?

* Blairs government
* rather than relying on common law and constitutional conventions- there has been a reader emphasis on the codification of what the positive rights of citizens are
* Terrorism

What did the HRA 1998 do?

* incorporated ECHR into British law
* British citizens now posses a clear statement of their civil liberties which is enforceable in UK courts

Why was the HRA so significant ?

* establishes positive rights
* Before HRA liberties were grounded in specific statute and case law.

What did the freedom of information act 2000 establish ?

* established a “right of acccess” to information held by public bodies as long as it doesn’t breach national security
* Allows public to know how public bodies operate eg the NHS

What scandal arose from the freedom of information act ?

MPs expense scandal 2009

What did the equality act 2010 establish

Established equality before the law for all citizens

Consolidated existing legislation

Acts passed to protect rights as a result of terrorist attacks?

* 2005 serious organised crime and police act- limited right to protest outside of parliament
* Terrorism act 2006- extended terrorist suspects could be held without charge for 28 days
* 2016- investigatory powers act- authorises retention of personal electronic data

Examples of the HRA protecting individual rights over collective rights:

* 2004- judges deemed that according to HRA the way the gov detained foreign terrorist suspects was discrimatory and gov was forced to release belmarsh prisoners.
* Abu Qatar- courts stopped him from being deported for 8 years due to the evidence that was found against him being obtained under torture which went against a fair and free trial of the HRA.

How was the HRA protected civil rights:

* Provided judges with power in protecting civil liberties
* Rights are clear to citizens

How is the HRA flawed?

* can be suspended/repealed
* Doesn’t represent higher law that we would have if there was a codified constitution
* Parliament remains the supreme law making body and can still enact legislation that conflicts with the ECHR.→ no parliament can bind its successor
* Even after belsmarsh detainers were released→ blair passed legislation quickly to ensure they were under close surveillance

Judges have less power to protect rights that in the US ( consitution)

Can’t strike down legislation

Pressure groups highly influential in making public aware of corroding rights.

Examples of parliament protecting rights:

* 2010 coalition committed to repealing identity cards
* 2008 browns attempt to increase the days of detention to 48 days was defeated in HOL and legislation shelved

The fact that so few acts have been opposed to ( identity cards) suggests the public don’t mind giving up some rights for their protection.

What did the ECHR declare was “unlawful” in 2021 relating to mass surveillance ?

In May 2021 the ECHR declared government powers to interject private communication “unlawful”

What does the civil liberties group “3 million” advocate for?

equal voting rights in the devolved regions- Scotland permits all EU residents regardless of settled status to vote in local elections whilst England does not

Who has campaigned against the 2022 Police, Crime and Sentencing act?

Friends of the earth

Which pressure group called Vaccine Passports/Vaccine mandates “coercive” and “punitive”?

Liberty

Who has campaigned against the governments use of emergency powers and the emergency measures during the pandemic ?

Big Brother Watch

How many signed a petition to make verified ID a requirement for opening a social media account in 2021 ?

700,000

What are the two goals of the electoral reform society ?

1. To have public authorities in the UK elected by proportional representation and specifically by the single member transferable vote in multi member constituencies
2. That the democratic institutions of the UK, its nations and regions and other constituent parts work in ways that lead to its ends having high levels of trust in them.

Why have opposition parties and civil liberties groups opposed legislation requiring voting ID?

* Voting fraud is very rare
* Will affect marginalised groups

why does the electoral reform society oppose voting ID laws?

* Those who can’t afford to go on holiday/travel are less likely to be able to vote

In the 2019 GE how many out of 58 million votes were electoral fraud?

33

What percentage of people believe voting at a polling station is safe from fraud and abuse?

90%

What policy passed despite Liberty advocating against Covid passports ?

Nichola Sturgeon enforced vaccine passports for entry to nightclubs and indoor live events (England was planning to adopt same policy but did a U-turn a few days after it was announced)

What are the 3 aims of 3million (the group)?

1. Defend rights of EU citizens to live, work, study and vote in the UK
2. Protect EU Citizens rights through advocacy in the UK and EU institutions
3. Ensure EU citizens know their rights and are empowered to stand up to them