Liberalism Intl Relations

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/44

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:44 PM on 1/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

45 Terms

1
New cards

What are the components of the liberal intl order?

Economic Interdependence, insitutions, democratic governance and human rights, collective defense and security guarantees

2
New cards

What are the pillars of the Kantian Triangle?

Democracy, economic integration (trade), intl law and organizations

3
New cards

What do the factors of the Kantian Triangle lead to when all met?

Zone of Peace

4
New cards

Why does Jean Jacques Rousseau think about human nature?

Human nature isn’t bad, it fluctuates and can be good too

5
New cards

What tests did Jean Jacques Rousseau do to argue human nature isn’t bad?

  1. Pity (humans express pity for others)

  2. Institutions and education are the problem

6
New cards

What are the failings of the liberal order?

  1. Unequal benefits and rising inequality

  2. Institutional Weaknesses

  3. Challengers from rising powers

  4. Erosion of domestic support (populist movements eroding liberal democracy)

7
New cards

What can be done to fix the liberal world order?

  1. Institution reform

  2. Strengthen economic safety nets

  3. Include rising powers

  4. Recommittal to liberal norms

8
New cards

What is the argument for why the liberal order may persist?

  • The liberal order has resilence because of intl institutions, economic intregration and norms

  • Rising powers like China benefit from this stability

  • Adapatation and reform sustain it rather than collapse

9
New cards

What is the realist counterargument to whether the liberal order will persist?

  1. Power matters, not rules - realist argue states will follow their own interest, not norms and institutions

  2. Decline of U.S. hegemony - without a dominant power, order is fragile

  3. Conflict is inevitable - economic interdepedence dosent prevent war if a power shift threatens a states security

  4. Institutions used by the powerful - institutions reflect U.S. dominance and can crumble if other powers challenge them

10
New cards

Why are maritime claims a threat to regional and intl security?

They involve sovereignty, resources, and strategic trade routes; disputes can escalate into conflict. Example: South China Sea disputes

11
New cards

What is cooperation in international relations?

When states work together for mutual benefit, e.g., joint resource management or negotiated maritime boundaries to reduce tensions.

12
New cards

What is a public good?

A good that is non-excludable and non-rivalrous; everyone can use it without reducing others’ benefit.

13
New cards

Examples of public goods?

Clean air, national defense, public parks, international security, disease eradication

14
New cards

What is a collective action problem?

When a group would benefit from cooperation, but individual incentives prevent contribution, risking failure of the collective goal

15
New cards

What is the free-rider problem?

Individuals or states benefit without contributing, reducing resources for cooperation and potentially causing failure

16
New cards

How can the collective action problem be solved?

Selective incentives, institutions with rules and enforcement, small groups for easier monitoring.

17
New cards

What are institutions?

Rules, norms, and organizations that structure interactions between states (e.g., UN, WTO, NATO).

18
New cards

How do institutions facilitate cooperation? (also address anarchy)

  1. Rules/norms

  2. verification

  3. enforcement

  4. acts as 3rd party mediator

  5. reducing transaction costs

  6. iteration

  7. information hub

  8. issue linkage

19
New cards

Who benefits from institutions?

All members gain stability and predictability; stronger states gain influence, weaker states gain protection.

20
New cards

What is democratic peace theory?

Democracies rarely fight each other due to shared norms and institutional constraints.

21
New cards

What factors explain democratic peace?

Norms (compromise, negotiation), institutions (checks and balances), plus other factors like trade and alliances.

22
New cards

Policy implications of democratic peace?

Promote democracy abroad, support democratic institutions, encourage transparency, but avoid forced interventions.

23
New cards

What are regimes?

Systems of formal and informal rules that determine how power is exercised in a state.

24
New cards

Main types of regimes?

Democracy (people rule), authoritarian (power concentrated), hybrid/semi-democracy (mixed features).

25
New cards

Problems in defining regimes?

Grey areas exist; rapid changes or misclassification possible.

26
New cards

Trends in regime types over time?

Increase in democracies post–1945 and after Cold War; recent backsliding in some regions.

27
New cards

Are regimes clustered regionally?

Yes: Democracies—North America, Western Europe; Authoritarian—Middle East, Central Asia, parts of Africa.

28
New cards

What explains variation in regimes?

History, economy, inequality, external influence, culture, and social factors.

29
New cards

How can cooperation reduce maritime tensions?

Through joint resource management, shared security, and negotiated dispute resolution.

30
New cards
How well have the authors’ 1999 predictions about the enduring liberal international order held up?
Partially true: The order has persisted due to institutions, rules, and interdependence, but challenges like rising populism, regional conflicts, and weakening U.S. influence stress the system.
31
New cards
Could an argument using realist theory lead to the same outcomes?
Realists might predict order persists if the hegemon (U.S.) remains powerful; outcome similar in stability, but for different reasons—power, not institutions or norms.
32
New cards
What is security co-binding?
When a hegemon’s security is tied to the security of other states through alliances or institutions, incentivizing it to maintain the order.
33
New cards
What is a penetrated hegemon, and how does it differ from other types of hegemony? Why does it lead to stability?
A hegemon embedded in and constrained by the international order it supports; differs from unilateral hegemon. Leads to stability because institutions and rules reduce conflict and create predictability.
34
New cards
What is a great power?
A state with significant military, economic, and political capabilities capable of influencing global or regional outcomes.
35
New cards
Who are semi-sovereign and partial great powers, and how do these differ from traditional concepts? Why important?
Semi-sovereign: states with constraints on autonomy; Partial great powers: states with some but not full influence. Important for understanding gradations of power and participation in the liberal order.
36
New cards
How does economic openness lead to cooperation and stability in the international system?
Trade and interdependence raise the costs of conflict, create incentives for cooperation, and make the system more stable.
37
New cards
What is civic identity? Is the argument about civic identity and stability convincing?
Civic identity: shared identity based on political principles and norms. Convincing because it fosters trust and cooperation, supporting stability, though other factors also matter.
38
New cards

What are the core assumptions of liberalism

  1. Human nature is inherently good, or at least not bad

  2. Anarchy

  3. Rational Actors

  4. Level of analysis - liberalism recognizes indidvual and organizations, states are no longer rational actors

39
New cards

What are the key idea of Wilsonian Liberalism?

Peace aviechable via intl law, treaties, institutions and collective security

40
New cards

Assumptions of Moravcsik Liberialism?

  1. Primacy of societal actors

  2. representation of state preferences - The state is a tool belt where groups and indidviduals can attain their interest

  3. Interdependence of the intl system - States eek their own preferences compared to the preferences of other states. State preferences are neither cooperative or conflictual

  4. Policy interdependance - Describes intl constraints and opporunities described above

41
New cards

What are the 3 variants of Moravcsik Liberialism?

  1. Ideational: focuses on the impact of ideas and values on state goals

  2. commerical: focuses on how global markets affect state interest

  3. republican: Focuses on how domestic political instiutuins shape preferences

42
New cards

What are the 5 ideas by Deudney and Ikenberry of the liberal explanation of stability in the post cold war era?

I. Security Co-binding II. Penetrated hegemony III. Semi-sovereignty / Partial great powers IV. Economic openness V. Civic identity

43
New cards

What are the assumptionsd of Neoliberal Instiutionalism?

  1. There is a large degree of room for intl cooperation

  2. denies the state-centric view of realism, other actors play a vital role

    • called complex interdependemnce

    • IGOs, NGOS, norms, etc.

  3. Motivations for state behavior can be both high (security) and low (economic and social) politics

  4. Shares many realist assumptions

44
New cards

How do institutions help the state?

  • providing information

  • reducing transaction costs

  • facilitation of reciporcity

  • providing focal points for policy coordination

  • issue linkage

45
New cards

Institutions can overcome relative gains problems when

  • Relative gains become less important when there are more states in the equation

  • When absolute gains are very large, relative gains become less important