1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Natural Selection vs genetic drift
Natural selection is when we have subset of population that is reproducing that has high fitness to cause allele changes in population (NONRANDOM)
Genetic drift is subset of population that is reproducing is RANDOM
Why does genetic drift occur?
Because of probability rules / gamete sampling error
As size of population increases, sampled frequencies begin to
look like expected frequencies
Why is drift a stronger force in smaller populations?
Allele changes are more extreme because will effect larger proportion than large populations
Genetic drift through sampling errors will ultimately cause allele to
drift to fixation or lost (ultimate fate)
Migration vs Genetic Drift
Migration
Increases diversity within a population
Decrease differences among a population (homogenizing force)
Genetic Drift
Decreases diversity within a population
Increased differences among populations
Probability of fixation in drift
If allele starts off as more common, more likely to drift toward fixation
Probability than an allele will drift towards fixation is equal to initial frequency of the allele
Ex. If A2 starts off in population as 50%, 50% going to become fixed and 50% going to become lost
Given that mutation introduces new alleles into a population, but they are usually at low frequencies, what is most likely the fate of an allele that is introduced to a population?
It will become lost
What is founder effect?
Small number of individuals find a new population
One time sampling error associated with population
Might not look like original population
Ex. Amish have high frequency of polydactyly as one of founders of Amish population had the gene, so now gene is at higher frequency than original population
What is population bottle neck?
Founder effect without moving
Population undergoes constriction in size causing effects to magnify if smaller population
Impact depends on size of population reduction and length of time in bottleneck
Ex. Overhunting can cause bottleneck
What did Buri Experiment reveal?
Showcased genetic drift in lab setting
Population size of 16 and allele frequency of 0.5
Evolved population under drift for 19 generations by choosing 8 flies at random to be next generation
Populations lost heterozygosity (Hz) at a rate more rapidly then expected, revealed effective population size of flies was 9 not 16
Heterozygosity (Hz)
Ranges from 0 to 1
Frequency of heterozygotes in population
Genetic drift causes heterozygosity (and other measures of genetic diversity) to decline
Decreases much more rapidly in smaller populations
No more heterozygosity when one of allele is lost and other allele went to fixation to only have homozygotes in population
Effective Population Size (Ne)
size of an ideal theoretical population based on its genetic diversity
number of individuals contributing alleles to next generation
can be explained by sexual selection for certain mating behavior for bias for decrease Hz
Why is Ne in humans 10,000 when population size is 7 billion?
Due to sexual selection and bottleneck in past which has decreased Hz greatly
Knowing what you do about the effects of genetic drift on Hz and how the strength of genetic drift varies with population size, what relationship would you expect between population size and Hz?
As population increases, expect to see population more genetically diverse so Hz increases
Drift coupled with selection
Both can cause loss of genetic diversity
Selection selects for beneficial alleles and eliminates deleterious ones
Drift: random alleles that are being fixed
Drift makes selection more noisy as will look less like idealized S shaped curve (selection alone) and expect more variation
If there is low enough effective size (Ne)..?
Effects of selection are neglible as drift becomes dominating mechanism of evolution
If there is large population size and Ne…?
selection dominates and effects of drift are neglible
How can drift work against selection?
Beneficial allele can be lost randomly
Deleterious allele can be fixed randomly
What is crossing fitness landscapes?
Theoretical idea on how drift can aid selection
If only selection is acting in a population, then selection is going to tend to drive populations to fitness optimum. Fitness optimum might just be local optimum, not global optimum A population get stuck
X axis: genetic variation Y axis: Fitness
With genetic drift and selection, it introduces more noise so it can randomly cross fitness valleys and reach new fitness optimum