1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
House of Brands
Independent, stand-alone brands, each maximizing impact on its own segments - P&G is canonical example
Endorsed brands
Independently positioned brands backed by a visible organizational brand. The endorser plays only a minor driver role but provides credibility - Marriott endorsing courtyard
Sub-strategies of endorsed brands
token endorsement - a logo or small tag - when endorser is already well known
Linked name - shared naming element creates implied endorsement without stating it explicitly (McMuffin, McFlurry)
Strong endorsement - endorser is prominent and active (courtyard by Marriott)
Subbrands
Brands connected to a master/parent brand that augment or modify its associations. Inline endorsed brands, the master brand here has a major driver role, not just a credibility function. The connection is closer, meaning the subbrand can affect the master brand’s image in both directions - risk and opportunity
Sub-strategies of sub-brands
co-drivers - both master brand and subbrand carry major driver roles (Gillette Mach 3) works when the master brand already has credibility
Master brand as a driver - master brand dominates - subbrand adds information (HP DeskJet)
Branded house
One master brand spans all offerings; subbrands are purely descriptive. The master brand is the dominant driver (virgin)
Advantages and Disadvantages of a branded house
Advantages: clarity (one brand = simple recall), synergy, leverage
Risk: concentrated vulnerability, Levi’s, nike, and Kodak all struggled to maintain a premium or cool position once. The master brand’s was stretched across to wide a product range
Substrategies of branded house
different identity - same master brand used across contexts but with distinct sub-identities (GE Capital)
Same identity - single unified brand identity (BMW, Virgin)