1/44
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
most common energies used for superficial tumors
6-20 MeV
inelastic collisions
with atomic e-=ionization and excitation (low Z)
with nuclei=bremsstrahlung (high Z)
elastic collisons
with atomic e-=electron electron scattering
with nuclei=coulomb scattering
KE redistributed
what does rate of energy loss depend on
e- density of medium it is travelling through
mass stopping power is greater for…
low Z material
high Z=more tightly bound e- and less e- oer gram
radiation losses (brems)
rate of energy loss is proportional to electron energy and Z²
probability of radiation loss increases iwth e- KE and Z
as KE and density increase, the chance of rad losses increase
XR produced more efficiently with higher energy e- and high atomic # absorbers
at what rate do electrons lose energy in soft tissue
2 MeV/cm in soft tissue when using > or = 1 MeV
mass stopping power
rate of energy loss
what is total energy lost made up of
energy lost to rad+energy lost to collisional
what force causes electrons to scatter
columb forces btwn incident e- and nuclei of medium cause electrons to scatter
most probable energy
(Ep)o= most probable energy which is defined at phantom surface
mean energy (E0)
related to depth at which dose is 50% of max dose (R50%)
energy at depth
most probable energy and mean energy decreases linearly with depth Z
mean energy at surface formula
E0=2.4 (meV/cm for water)x R50
output
absorbed dose per MU at Dmax
beam calibrated to
1 cGy/MU for reference applicator, Dmax, central axis, 100 SSD
depth dose distribution
can be determined by ion chambers, diode, films
where do electrons lsoe energy
at 2 MeV/cm of water
depth of 90% isodose
d90%=E/3.2
therapeutic range
D90% most useful txt depth
D80% formula
E/2.8
beyond max range of e-, the dose is contributed only by
XR contamination caused by Brems
why is XR contamination an issue for total skin e-
XR contam dose is increased by 6 times
what is XR contamination
dose contributed by Brems interactions with scattering foil
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DMAX AND ENERGY
DMAX INCREASES WITH ENERGY
lower energues-electrons scatter more easily so dose builds up more rapidly and over shorter distance
at what energies is there higher skin dose
higher energies, increase skin dose
what is the shape of low Energy electron isodose curves
they bulge out at all lebels
field flatness recommendation
ref plane perpendicular to central axis at 95% isodose depth
dose variation should be +- 5%
field symmetry recommendation
compares dose profile from one side to other
pair of points at same distance on each side should not differ by 2%
field size dependence
dose increases with FS due to more scatter from collimator and phantom
PDD increases with FS
deoth of Dmax increases with field size
does dmax shift towards or farther from the surface for smaller field sizes
it shift towards surface bc there is less lateral scatter, so reraches Dmax faster
when using a bolus, where does depth dose shift
shifts “upstream” equal to bolus thickness
boluses can..
fix surface irregularities
decrease electrons penetrating in certain areas
increase skin dose
density of bolus
1g/cm²
what do low atomic number material like acrylic do
reduces energy of electron beam
Dmax=
Dmax=Drx/%D
minimum thickness of lead needed to block
if using cerrobend?
electron energy/2
if using cerrobend, need 20% more material so 1.2
2 adjacent electron fields
create hotspot near skin surface
when electron and photon field abut, where does max dose/hotspot develop and where does cold spot develop
hotspot forms on photon section
coldspot develosp on electron side
bc electrons scatter into photon field
inhomogeneities formula
Deff=d-z (1-CET)
formula for tissue with diff kinds of inhomogeneities
Deff=(thickness of tissue x density)+ (thickness of tissue x density)
CET OF WATER
1
CET OF LUNG
0.3
CET OF SOFT BONE
1.1
CET OF HARD BONE
1.65