REP human rights arguments

Protecting all human rights all the time ensures the world is a safe place to live

However is criminals had the right to freedom or movement, the world would not be a safe and happy place

We have the duty to look after other human beings rights

However when we have limited resources like food or shelter then we have to decide who gets these human rights

Everyone is equal, and everyone deserves to be treated with respect

However some human rights can be used for the wrong way, e.g. the right to free speech and freedom of expression can allow people to say and do harmful and dangerous things

This can stop further conflicts and wars

However some human rights can conflict with religion for example in the catholic church, women can not become priests and some argue that this goes against the right to freedom from discrimination

They give every country clear guidlines

Human rights assumes that everyone is equal - but is this actually true? Surely people who follow the rules and obey the laws deserve better treatment than those who break the rules and do not obey