1/98
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Three main primate tendencies
Adapted for a lief in the trees (arboreal adaption)
Eat a variety of foods (dietary plasticity)
Invest a lot of time and care in few offspring (high degree of parental investment)
Dietary plasticity
Lack of dietary specialization – generalized feeders (omnivorous) with generalized dentition
4 types of teeth:
Incisors and canines: biting and cutting
Premolars and molars: crushing and grinding
Parental investment
Relatively long gestation periods
Few offspring, delayed maturation, longer lifespan than other mammals
Greater dependence on learned behavior
Relatively large and complex brain
Arboreal adaption hypothesis
Traditionally, the arboreal adaptation seen as the primary factor in primate evolution
Selected for 3D and color vision
Grasping prehensile hands/feet
Tropical arboreal environment = varied foods
Visual predation hypothesis
Primates evolved in bushy forest undergrowth relying on insect diet
Grasping hands and vision for grabbing insects
Tree jumping/ climbing is a result
Two suborders
Prosimii (strepsirrhini)
Lemurs, lorises, tarsiers
Anthropoidea (haplorhini)
Monkeys, apes, humans
Promsimians
lemurs and lorises
Most primitive
Greater reliance on olfaction (long snouts)
Mark territory with scent
Shorter gestation and maturation
Unfused mandible and frontal bones
“Dental comb”, grooming claw
Tarsiers
Nocturnal
SE Asia
Mated pair and offspring
Diet: insects and small vertebrates
Difficult to classify
Anthropoids
monkeys and apes
Larger body, larger brain
Eyes fully forward; postorbital closure
Fused mandibles, frontal bones
Longer gestation; longer maturation; increased parental care
Catarrhines vs. Platyrrhines
Catarrhines
Owm (old world monkeys) and apes
Nostrils closer and downward
Platyrrhines
Nwm (new world monkeys)
Well separated nostrils
New world monkeys
Almost exclusively arboreal
Prehensile tails (some)
Two (size) groups:
Callitrichids
Cebids
Callitrichids (marmosets and tamarins)
Claws instead of nails
Twins rather than single births
Family groups
Mated pair
2 males and 1 female
Cebids
Larger than callitrichids
30+ species
Diet varies with combo of fruits and leaves
Most are quadrupeds
Spider monkeys are semibrachiators
old world monkeys
Two subfamilies
Cercopithecinae
colobinae
cercopithecinae
Many exhibit
Sexual dimorphism
Ischial callosities
More generalized than colobines
More omnivorous
Cheek pouches to store food while foraging
Colobines
Leaf diet, sacculated stomach
Colobus monkey exclusive to Africa
Langurs found in Asia
Proboscis in Borneo
OWM vs. Ape molars
OWM
Bilophodont molars
Ape
Y-5 molars
Hominpods
humans and apes
Gibbons and siamangs
orangutangs
gorillas
chimpanzees
ecology
the interrelationship between an animal and its habitat
adaption
the process by which a species changes or adjusts to its environment – can be anatomical or behavioral
Ecology affects
Behavior
Type of foraging strategy
Type of social group
Size, # of males and females
Anatomical structure
Type of locomotion
Type of dentition
The ecological niche
Where you live (habitat)
What you eat (diet) and how you extract it (foraging strategy)
When you are active
How you move
primate habitats
Two types of tropical/subtropical habitats
Tropical rain forests
Moist, less seasonal, more trees
Tropical woodland savanna
Drier, more seasonal, less trees
tropical rain forests
Climate
Equatorial belt
Warm temperature
High annual rainfall
>60 inches
Consistent: less seasonality
Primates
Arboreal
Specialists
High species richness
tropical woodland savanna
Climate
N or s of equatorial belt
Temperature is not constant
Lower humidity
Less rainfall
Dry seasons
More seasonal
Primates
Less species richness
No more than 4 or 5 species
Generalists
Terrestrial primates
Many old world monkeys such as baboons or macaques
What's so important about diet
Influences all aspects of a primates life
How nutritious is the food you eat?
Do you have to compete for food?
Is the food available year round?
Are you limited by your food?
What limits diet choice
Nutritional requirements
Habitat
Quality of food and tradeoffs
Body size
Food distribution
requirements of diet
Satisfy energy requirements
Calories
Provide specific nutrients
Proteins, fats
Vitamins, minerals
Water
Minimize exposure to toxins
how much diet do you need
Basal metabolic rate (BMR)
Active metabolism
Growth
Reproduction
diet types
Frugivory
Folivory
Insectivory
Gumnivory
Graminivory
Semnivory
diet tradeoffs
Insect, small animals
High quality, but small and hard to find
Fruit
High energy, but low protein
Leaves
Abundant. Protein, but low quality, and toxins
Seeds and grasses
High quality but small, hard to get at and toxic
size and food
Big body, lower metabolism: can survive on low-quality food, but need lots of it!
Small body, higher metabolism: need high-quality, quickly digested food, but only need a little (ex. Tarsier, mouse)
food distribution
Space
Clumped
Found in patches; everybody competes
Evenly distributed
All over, everyone spreads out
Time-seasonality
Seasonal habitats
Diets must change during the year
Food shortages
Non seasonal
Constant food supply
activity patterns
Diurnal
Nocturnal
Cathemeral
Crepuscular
primate locomotion
Vertical clinging and leaping
Quadrupedalism
Suspension
Knuckle-walking
Bipedalism
Quadrupeadalism
Aroboreal
Adapted for branches
Shorter limbs
Curved digits
All new world monkeys, colobines
Terrestrial
Adapted for the ground
Longer limbs
Short digits
More stability in shoulder and elbow
Some OW monkeys
Suspensory locomotion
Arms longer than legs
Very long forelimbs
Mobile joints
Curved digits (fingers and toes)
Only “true” brachiators are gibbons
Primatology
Study of primate behavior and ecology
Behavior is an adaption to environment
Behavior is result of evolution: natural selection
primates problem
Get enough food
Avoid becoming food
primates solution
Live in social groups
Benefit avoid predation
More individuals = more eyes
Dilution effect
Cost: more individuals = more noticeable to predators
Benefit: others help find food protect food supply from other social groups
Cost: food competition
Group can't be too big
Relationship between group sixe and other group encounter success for capuchin monkeys
resource defense model
Animals group together to defend resources
Upper limit to group size
Too big: disadvantage, too much within group
Ways to resolve within group conflict
Dominance hierarchies
Dominance hierchies resolve within group conflict
Individuals ranked relative to each other
Access to resources
Reduce aggression
Rank not permanent
Rank may be inherited
Can affect reproductive success
Predator avoidance model
Live in groups for defense against predators
Benefits of reduced predation risk outweighs costs of within-group competition
The two models interact:
Predator avoidance: minimum size
Resource competition: maximum size
social benefits of living in a group
Learning is easier
Finding a mate is easier
Sharing information is easier
Assistance in rearing offspring
Divisions of labor are possible
social system
The grouping pattern in which a primate species lives, including its size and composition, evolved in response to natural and sexual selection pressures
elements of a social system
Group size and composition
Use of the environment
Breeding/mating system
Nature of intragroup social behavior
Emigration pattern
ranging patterns
Home range: the spatial area used by a primate group
The area that contains all the resources used by group members for feeding, resting, and sleeping
Territory: an exclusive home range defended against other groups
territory defense
Benefits: prevents outsiders from exploiting resources
Costs: vigilance, energy of defense
philopatry
staying in ones natal (birth) group as an adult
females
dispersal
leaving group upon reaching puberty
males
principles of sociobiology
Behavior has some genetic basis
Behavior is subject to process of evolution by natural selection in the same way as morphology
Reciprocal altruism
help now in exchange for help later
certain conditions must be met
Frequent interactions
Individual recognition
Way of punishing cheaters
Long term benefits outweigh costs
the logic of natural selection
More individual are born each generation than can survive and reproduce which results in competition among individuals
There is biological variation both morphological and behavioral among individuals
Individuals who possess certain favorable traits whether morphological or behavioral have a better chance of surviving or reproducing than other individuals who lack those traits and will thus
Degree of relatedness of “r”
Full siblings ½
Half siblings ¼
Parent-offspring ½
Grandparent-grandchild ¼
Aunt/uncle - niece/nephew ¼
Cousin 1/8
inclusive fitness
An indivudals total genetic contribution to the next generation
Includes own direct fitness plus indirect fitness devalued by “r”
DF + r x IF
hamiltons rule
B x r > C
B = benefit to recipient
C = cost to actor
r = degree of relatedness between actor and recipient
kin selection
Process by which traits or behaviors arise via natural selection through their effects on the survivorship or reproduction of relatives
male and female stradegies
Male reproductive success: limited by access to mates
Female reproductive success: limited by access to resources (pregnancy and lactation are energetically very expensive)
Determinants of social groups
Females distribute themselves based on distribution of resourecs
Fruit
Leaves
Insects
Males: distribute themselves based on where females are
Males – females – food
types of social systems
Solitary (noyau)
Monogamy
Polygyny:
One male, multi female
Polyandry
One female, multi male
Polygynandry
Multi male, multi female (fission-fusion)
Solitary/noyau
Usually nocturnal, solitary animals
Meet only to mate
Male ranges overlap females
Both sexes disperse
Orangutans
Strepsirhines
polygyny
Single male- multi female group and bachelor males
Groups that consist of one or more males and multiple females
Polygyny = multiple females
Characterized by complex social interactions
Dominance hierarchies
Mate guarding
Male male competition
harem
Usually female philopatry
Bachelor males
Multiple male influxes
Gorillas
dominance hierarchy
ranking determined by contests (fights)
Multi male groups: males compete for dominance
Females have dominance hierchies too! Food
infanticide
The killing of infants, either by members of the infants group or members of a rival group
Usuallt happens during male takeovers
Male strategy
Get females ready to conceive (in estrus)
polygynandrous
Multimale – multifemale social group (with male emigration)
Vervet monkey
Mate guarding impossible
Sperm competition
Paternity confusion
fission fusion
Multi male, multi female
Animals travel in foraging parties of varying sizes instead of in cohesive group
Response to patchy food distribution and competition for food
sexual dimorphism
difference in body size or form between sexes
Larger or smaller body size
Secondary sexual characteristics: pelage, coloration, canines
One male multifemale: males much larger
Multi male, multifemale: males usually larger
competitive males
High ranking males attempt to monopolize conceiving females
Male rank is correlated with reproductive success
Male reproductive success tied to number of different females he can mate with
Infanticide
sexually selected male reproductive strategy
If unweaned infant dies, female resumes cycling immeadiatelt
Death of infant makes females available for mating sooner
Infanticidal males gain immediate mating opportunities
If male tenure is short, infanticide enhances male
Counterstratgies to thwart infanticide
Defend victims of attack
Mothers
Female kin
Males present at conception
Confuse paternity
Estrus swellings
Mate with many males
Mate with newcomers
primate communication
Tactile (touch)
Olfactory (smell)
Optical (see)
Auditory (hear)
tactile
Hugging, kissing, and grooming are forms of reconciliation
Provides feeling of well-being, reassurance
Often lifelong relationships
olfactory
smell
Prosimians (strepsirrhines): rely heavily on smell
Anthropoids (haplorhines): smell is reduced
chemical signals/ pheromones
Territory defense
Body secretions
galagos and pottos urine mark four times more frequently near the periphery of their ranges than in the center
Scent marking
Marking territory
Ring-tailed lemurs scent marking/ olfactory signals
sexual receptivity
nonhuman primate females indicate readiness to mate through olfactory cues
Males often smell the perineal region of the female
“sweaty T-shirt" study
Clause wedekind 1995
Had males where the same shirt and not shower
They put the tshirts in bins and the male and females were split by their immune system
Had the females rate the scents
Females perfered the immune system that differed from theirs
optical
One animal gains info from another by looking at it
Not only facial signals but how an individual spaces itself, and its body postures
Anthropoids (haplorhines) have better innervation to their muscles of facial expression than do prosimians
auditory
Species recognition
Each species has a unique repertoire
New species of busy babies and tarsiers discorved on the basis of their vocalizations
Within and between group distinctions
Territory defense – long distnace vocalizations communicate whereabouts and allows members of different groups to avoid or approach each other
Traditional view of non-human primate communication
Involuntary
No syntax
Affective vs. referential
Not symbolic
Origins of human language
Primates do not learn or use language the same way as humans
Vocal tract and brain (broca’s area) adaptions for language
Broca's area larger on left side in humans, chimps, and gorillas
Captive studies
Chimps and gorillas can interpret visual signs (sign language) and use them to communicate
Can teach each other
Can categorize new objects
human culture and communication
Larger brains, complex learning
Think symbolically and use language
Adaptive strategy = culture
Why are primates brains so big?
Could have to do with
finding food
Social engagement
What selection pressure favors intelligence in primates?
Ecological factors associated with locating and processing inaccessible food items
Social factors associated with life in large complex social groups
Ecological intelligence – selection would favor:
Spacial mental maps of food trees
“temporal maps” for sseasonal food
Ability to find and extract “hidden” foods (hard shelled nuts, buried roots and tubers, insect larvae in tree bark)
Ability to use tools to access food
Social intelligence – selection would favor:
Ability to:
Deal with conflict and competition
Reconcile disputes (make peace)
Form dominance hierarchies
Form coalitions and enduring social bonds
Engage in reciprocity
Deceive others, detect deception
“social brain hypothesis” (Dunbar 1998)
The view that our cognitive capacities constrain the size of primate societies (number of friends)
Alternatively, social complexities drove brain size to an upper limit related to group size
primate brains
Primate brains are adapted for an arboreal lifestyle
Significant adaption in the areas that process visual information
Primates are very good at depth perception and shape recognition
Anthropoids (haplorhines)
Developed a diet focusing largely on fruit, unlike the very insectivorous prosimians (strepsirhines)
Mental maps, group formation, territories
Even larger brains, especially the portion related to shape recognition
Anthropoid visual system
Developed a much-heightened ability to recognize faces and facial expressions
Connections between amygdala (emotional brain) and neocortex (cognition, reasoning)
Can use facial expressions to communicate – and can interpret – emotional states
Social behavior further drives the evolution of brain size
Frugivore vs. Folivore brains
Folivores have smaller brains than frugivores
Gut needs to be very long to digest leaves
Heavy metabolic investment in digestion
The balance cannot be made up by decreasing heart, kidney, or liver
So... brain size must be limited in folivores
Is there a selective release on frugivore brain size? Or reduction in folivore brains?
deception
behavior that acts to persuade another to believe something is false
Examples in primates: false alarm calls, hiding to mate
theory of mind
Deceptive behavior in primates suggests the ability to think about what another individual is thinking
Knowing that other individuals have minds and beliefs, and these beliefs may differ from one's own beliefs
“Mind reading”
Usually evaluated through “false belief test”
The machicavellian hypothesis
The most complex part of a primate's daily life is the everchanging nature of (multiple) social interactions
Success in reproduction and access to high-quality foods requires constant monitoring of one's social standing
Tactical deception
When one individual misleads a second individual in order to obtain some immediate goal, normally available to or under control of the second
mirror recognition test
Monkey and gorillas invariably FAIL
Chimpanzees sometimes pass/sometimes fail
Chimpanzees that are raised in human conditions are the most likely to PASS
What do anthropoids do that might have set the stage for theory of mind
Theory of mind is evident in humans, but no clear evolutionary antecedents
There is a correlation between theory of mind and general problem-solving ability
It is very harcd for anthropoids to inhibit emotionally based facial responses because they are largely involuntary
This may explain their poor performance on many false belief tests
Anthropodis do use tactical deception, but without theory of mind they are relatively poor liars
Criteria for cultural acts in other species
Innovation: new pattern is invented or modified
Dissemination: pattern is acquired (through imitation) by another from an innovator
Standardization: form of pattern is consistent and stylized
Durability: pattern is performed without presence of demonstrator
Diffusion: patterns spreads from one group to another
Tradition: pattern persists from innovators generation to the next
Nonsubsistence: pattern transcends subsistence
Naturalness: pattern is shown in absence of direct human influence
Leaf clipping: symbolic behavior
In some communities
Done by males – aggression, frustration
In other communities
Done by males and females to indicate grooming or copulation interest, “flirting”