Critical Reasoning: Language, Meaning, and Argument Style (Vocabulary)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A set of vocabulary flashcards covering key terms from the lecture on language, meaning, and argument evaluation.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

Emotive meaning

The aspect of language that conveys emotions or attitudes and can influence how an argument is received, separate from its factual content.

2
New cards

Cognitive meaning

The informational content of a statement—its factual or evidence-bearing content—distinct from emotional impact.

3
New cards

Emotive language

Language that expresses or evokes emotion rather than neutrally stating facts; can sway judgment without providing evidence.

4
New cards

Value claim

A claim about what is good, bad, right, wrong, better or worse that is part of cognitive meaning and typically requires support.

5
New cards

Vagueness

A property of terms that allows borderline cases and a continuum of interpretations, lacking precise boundaries.

6
New cards

Ambiguity

A property where a term has more than one clear meaning within a context, making interpretation uncertain.

7
New cards

Factual dispute

A disagreement about what actually happened or what is true about facts.

8
New cards

Verbal dispute

A disagreement about the meaning of terms or language rather than about facts.

9
New cards

Inductive strength

The degree to which premises support the conclusion in an inductive argument—probable, not guaranteed.

10
New cards

Deductive validity

A relationship where if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true; guarantees are logical necessity.

11
New cards

Inductive indicator language

Words or phrases that signal an inductive claim (e.g., “It probably follows that…”).

12
New cards

Deductive indicator language

Words or phrases that signal a deductive claim (e.g., “It necessarily follows that…”).

13
New cards

Special indicator words

Specific terms that signal the inferential relationship between premises and conclusion.

14
New cards

Inferential claim

The claim about how strongly the premises support the conclusion (the strength of the inference).

15
New cards

Premises

Statements that provide support for the conclusion of an argument.

16
New cards

Conclusion

The claim that an argument attempts to establish or support.

17
New cards

Emotive terminology

Descriptive words with strong emotional charge (e.g., “cruel,” “monstrous”) used to influence attitudes.

18
New cards

Steamroller effect (emotive language)

The tendency of emotive language to overwhelm counterarguments by compelling assent without scrutiny.

19
New cards

Emotive clothing

The idea that emotive language disguises a value claim as neutral information, giving psychological momentum to the claim.

20
New cards

Hidden value claim

A value claim embedded in emotive language that demands supporting reasons, even if not stated outright.

21
New cards

Diagramming method

A method to map out basic argument patterns (vertical, horizontal, conjoint premises, multiple conclusions) to analyze structure.

22
New cards

Counterexample Method

A technique for proving invalidity by providing a counterexample to the argument’s form.

23
New cards

Categorical syllogism

A deductive argument form with linked categorical statements; an example of a clearly deductive structure.

24
New cards

It probably follows that…

Inductive indicator phrase signaling probable rather than certain conclusions.

25
New cards

It necessarily follows that…

Deductive indicator phrase signaling a conclusion that must be true if premises are true.

26
New cards

Absolute support

Premises that provide unconditional support for the conclusion, indicating a deductive argument.

27
New cards

Probable support

Premises that provide support to the conclusion but do not guarantee it, indicating an inductive argument.

28
New cards

Disentangling cognitive and emotive meaning

Separating factual content from emotional language to evaluate an argument properly.