Working Memory 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/37

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

38 Terms

1
New cards

what are the 2 activation-based models for working memory?

Cowan’s embedded-process model, Oberauer’s three-embedded components model

2
New cards

Working memory capacity is demonstrated by which theory by Cowan?

Cowan’s magical number 4

3
New cards

Variation in working memory is demonstrated by which 2 hypotheses?

executive attention hypothesis, binding hypothesis

4
New cards

for the concept of General Intelligence, Charles Spearmann conducted a scientific study that revealed…

performance on all cognitive tasks stems from a single factor ‘g’ or general factor of intelligence

5
New cards

Donald O Hebb and Raymond Cattell built on the concept of general intelligence to form 2 new concepts….

crystallised intelligence and fluid intelligence

6
New cards

Crystallised intelligence involves…

putting learned knowledge to use correctly

7
New cards

fluid intelligence involves…

the ability to reason through and solve novel problems

8
New cards

fluid intelligence require the understanding of rules but also the…

adaptive understanding to create solutions to novel issues

9
New cards

Miller’s magic number 7 refers to….

the short term memory capacity of 7 that most participants get correct

10
New cards

to boost short term memory capacity, you can use….

active rehearsal and chunking

11
New cards

Cowan’s magic number 4 refers to the fact that…

only representations in the focus of attention are available to conscious awareness and report, with average capacity limit of 4

12
New cards

what are the 3 limitations to working memory?

decay, interference and limited resource

13
New cards

decay as a limitation to WM refers to…

the fact that WM representations rapidly decay over time

14
New cards

restoration mechanisms for decay include…

rehearsal and refreshing

15
New cards

interference as a limitation to WM refers to…

the fact that WM is limited by mutual interference between representations

16
New cards

types of interference include

confusion, superposition and overwriting

17
New cards

proactive interference involves…

older memories impairing new memory retrieval

18
New cards

retroactive interference involves…

new memories impairing older memory retrieval

19
New cards

limited resources as a limitation to WM refers to…

WM capacity being determined by a limited quantity of resource enabling holding representations available

20
New cards

resource is allocated to representations in two ways…

discrete and continuous

21
New cards

discrete allocation of resource to representations involves…

the allocation of resource to a limited number of items with no information stored about additional items

22
New cards

continuous allocation of resource to representations involves…

equal spread of resource among all items with fewer resource per item for larger arrays

23
New cards

models for resource allocation:

  • discrete?

  • continous?

egg carton slot model, memory drive model

24
New cards

WM capacity is greater in… and…

older children than younger children, younger adults than older adults

25
New cards

to measure variation in WM, you can use…

the letter updating task

26
New cards

the task impurity problem refers to the concept that…

any task that assesses cognitive ability also demands other abilities that are needed to process structure and materials of the task

27
New cards

Miyake and Friedman investigated a solution to the Task Impurity Problem using Latent Variable Modelling. This involves…

selecting multiple tasks that seem different on the surface but capture the same target abilities

28
New cards

variation in WM is correlated with variation in many other abilities such as…

vocab learning, reasoning and attention

29
New cards

one explanation for why people differ in WM is the executive attention hypothesis. this was proposed by Shipstead et al and suggests that there are 2 systems of executive function being a key to success. these are…

system 1 where there is quick and easy access to all information known, system 2 where there is controlled and effortful processing of information

30
New cards

the WM task for executive attention hypothesis involves…

maintaining access to relevant information and assign new information to a list whilst disengaging from outdated information from previous trials

31
New cards

the reasoning task for the executive attention hypothesis involves…

maintaining a problem and allowing systematic hypothesis testing and disengaging from outdated hypotheses

32
New cards

both WM capacity and reasoning arise from

limited executive function

33
New cards

one explanation for why people differ in WM is the binding hypothesis. this was proposed by Oberauer et al. This involves the concept that there is…

a system for rapid formation of temporary bindings underlying WM and reasoning task performance

34
New cards

WM tasks for the binding hypothesis involve

lists of objects at position 1 2 or 3 so they become bound to these positions

35
New cards

reasoning tasks for the binding hypothesis involves…

binding understanding to a semantic space, where objects are bound to semantic spaces

36
New cards

people who suffer less interference can build more complex structural representations, so therefore…

will perform better in WM and reasoning

37
New cards

an issue with executive attention tasks is that

they do not correlate well so it is hard to directly test them

38
New cards

an issue with the binding hypothesis tasks is that

bindings may be constructed and maintained with the help of executive attention which makes it hard to compare them