Neurodevelopment and Poverty Exam 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/107

flashcard set

Earn XP

Last updated 3:43 AM on 3/30/23
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

108 Terms

1
New cards
neglect
omission of needed caregiver behaviors
2
New cards
physical neglect
inadequate care, inadequate hygiene, inadequate environment
3
New cards
supervisory neglect
parental incapacitation, parental absence, inappropriate people in home
4
New cards
emotional negelct
don’t feel important/loved, not provided strength and support, family wasn’t close/look out for each other
5
New cards
3 parts of executive functioning

1. response inhibition
2. cognitive flexibility
3. working memory
6
New cards
PFC subregions
dorsomedial (includes superior frontal gyrus), dorsolateral (includes middle frontal gyrus), ventromedial, orbitofrontal, ventrolateral
7
New cards
inhibition
this part of executive functioning shows rapid improvements in early childhood (3-6yo) and improves through middle childhood (8-12yo)
8
New cards
4\.5 years old
age where inhibition engages ONLY medial PFC
9
New cards
9 year olds
do 9yo or adults have more PFC activation during inhibition?y
10
New cards
inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)
inhibition is associated with activation of this brain region (hint: in PFC)
11
New cards
working memory
this part of executive functioning develops linearly between age 4-14, and levels off at age 15
12
New cards
salience and fronto-parietal control network
as children age, flexibility/shifting increases activation in this network
13
New cards
flexibility
this part of executive functioning reaches adult-like levels at 15yo
14
New cards
dlPFC
as children age, shifting tasks involves decreased activation in what brain region?
15
New cards
2 years old
effects of poverty on EF emerge as early as ________
16
New cards
early childhood enrichment
what mediates the effect of income on WM (Hackman et al., 2015)
17
New cards
bucharest early intervention project (Hymphreys et al., 2022)
study where foster care kids have higher IQ scores, WM, perceptual reasoning, and verbal comprehension compared to institutionalized children
18
New cards
Hair et al 2015
Study where low SES= atypical gray matter development in frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and hippocampus. Gray matter smaller for children below poverty line. Lower SES= achievement deficits explained by frontal and temporal lobe differences
19
New cards
Tomlinson et al 2020
Study where lower family income resulted in poorer task performance on go/no-go task. Activation in right ACC, thalamus, and IFG= better task performance. Higher poverty= less inhibition activation in IFG, medial temporal gyrus, cuadate, striatum
20
New cards
ACC, thalamus, IFG
Brain regions that are activated when performing better on go/no-go task that measures accuracy and reaction time (so better inhibition)(Tomlinson et al). Hint: there are three
21
New cards
positive
positive or negative correlation between parental education and WM function
22
New cards
negative
positive or negative correlation between parental education and middle frontal gyrus activation during WM task
23
New cards
ACC and lateral PFC
institutionalized children had thicker __ __and__ ____ compared to foster care group
24
New cards
ACC and IFG
foster care group had thinner __ __and__ ______ compared to institutionalized children
25
New cards
thinning
is cortical thickening or thinning related to better IQ?
26
New cards
serve and return interactions
child initiates engagement and parent responds by talking, touching, and eye contact
27
New cards
LENA
talk pedometer that records what kids say. looks for word count, child vocalization frequency, and conversational turn-taking
28
New cards
vocalizations
conversational turn-taking increases as ______ increases (these increase with age)
29
New cards
parental education
what is linked to number of words adults say around children, number of child vocalization, and number of conversational turns
30
New cards
wernicke’s area
brain area involved with phoneme and auditory word perception (understanding language)
31
New cards
Broca’s area
brain area involved with phonological access and output (speaking language)
32
New cards
semantic storage and retrieval
dmPFC, angular gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, IFG (pars orbitalis) are all involved in this part of language
33
New cards
IFG (pars triangularis)
brain area involved with general verbal retrieval, selection, and WM
34
New cards
occipitotemporal sulcus
brain area involved with visual word form area
35
New cards
ventral stream
stream involved with taking sound and writing and turning it into meaning
36
New cards
dorsal stream
stream involved with speech production and written language generation
37
New cards
Romeo et al 2018
Study where SES correlated with increased cortical thickness in Broca’s area and regions of temporal lobe. Kids intensive summer reading intervention-→ people who responded to intervention had increase in cortical thickness. WEIRDLY most cortical thickening was for low-SES children and those with lowest reading scores
38
New cards
9 months old
EEG studies can see reduced gamma-band power in frontal regions, causing language related differences, in children at what age?
39
New cards
more power high-frequency
EEG combination where you see higher language, cognitive, and social-emotional scores
40
New cards
more power low-frequency
EEG combination where you see developmental, behavioral, attentional, and learning problems
41
New cards
decrease, increase
as kids age, EEG low-frequency power ____ (increase or decrease) and high-frequency power ------
42
New cards
perisylvian
SES is correlated with brain activation in ______ cortex during rhyming tasks in children/adolescents
43
New cards
elision measure
Test where you say a word without saying a specific sound
44
New cards
blending words
test where you take multiple sounds and put them together to make a word
45
New cards
fusiform gyrus
another term for the visual word form area
46
New cards
fusiform gyrus
this brain region is responsible for getting sound or meaning out of written letters
47
New cards
wernicke’s area
another term for the superior temporal gyrus/perisylvian cortex
48
New cards
language comprehension
superior temporal gyrus/perisylvian cortex/wernicke’s area is responsible for _______?
49
New cards
fusiform gyrus
When low SES had high phonetic awareness, they had high activation in this region. When low SES children had low phonetic awareness, they had low activation in this region
50
New cards
high SES
_____ children had high fusiform activation for both high and low phonetic awareness
51
New cards
right superior temporal gyrus
low-income children with more phonetic awareness had an increase activation in what region besides fusiform gyrus? (high-SES kids did NOT see activation in this area). Hint: pick a left or right side
52
New cards
distal association
theory where low SES-→ impairments/delays in language development
53
New cards
proximal association
theory where variable exposures to language-→ variation in language ability
54
New cards
Broca’s area
more conversational turns= more activation in this area during language processing
55
New cards
left IFG
activation of this brain region explained 48% relationship between conversational turns and language score
56
New cards
experience dependent
neural plasticity that allows for storage of information that is unique to the individual
57
New cards
experience expectant
neural plasticity that is designed to utilize environmental information that is typical of our evolutionary history (ex. pruning)
58
New cards
value learning
process by which we take actions in the world, observe positive or negative consequences, and learn to continue or discontinue behaviors based on the outcomes
59
New cards
primary rewards
naturally elicit a reward response (food, sex, endorphin rush)
60
New cards
secondary rewards
learn to associate with primary rewards (money)
61
New cards
drive reduction
removal of state of need (ex. eating food removes feeling of hunger)
62
New cards
reward learning rate
extent to which a reward prediction error alters subsequent expected values
63
New cards
high learning rate
recent outcomes are heavily weighted
64
New cards
low learning rate
recent outcomes only lead to a small adjustment in value, giving relatively more weight to entire history of outcomes
65
New cards
dopamine
NOT a reward NT, but a learning NT
66
New cards
approach
continue seeking things that provide rewards
67
New cards
avoid
avoid things that lead to losses
68
New cards
tuberoinfundibular pathway
dopamine pathway from hypothalamys to pituitary. Associated with expression of hormone prolactin
69
New cards
nigrostriatal pathway
dopamine pathway from substantia nigra to dorsal striatum. associated with motor responses when achieving reward
70
New cards
mesolimbic pathway
dopamine pathway from VTA to NAcc. Associated with subjective feeling of pleasure from rewarding stimuli
71
New cards
median forebrain bundle
this brain region connects VTA to NAcc and limbic system in mesolimbic pathway
72
New cards
mesocotrical pathway
doapmine pathway from VTA to PFC. Associated with habit formation, reward anticipation and cravings
73
New cards
risk
when one decision or action could lead to one of multiple possible outcomes
74
New cards
risk-taking
tradeoff amount of reward and probabiliy of reward occurring
75
New cards
risk aversion
prefer higher probabilities of low-payoffs to low probabilities of high-payoffs
76
New cards
ambiguity
probability of any one outcome occurring is unknown, uncertain, or variable
77
New cards
ambiguity aversion
tendency to prefer certain outcomes to uncertain ones, even if it comes at a cost
78
New cards
OFC
patients with ______ lesions don’t show risk or ambiguity aversion
79
New cards
OFC and striatum
two brain regions that encode subjective value (how valuable an outcome is to an individual given their risk and ambiguity tolerance and personal factors)
80
New cards
MPFC, striatum, PCC, and amygdala
4 brain regions correlated with individuals subjective value. Activation is higher when there is risk AND ambiguity than risk alone
81
New cards
right IFG, anterior insula, and posterior parietal cortex
3 brain regions associated with ambiguity
82
New cards
delay discounting
tendency to weigh near costs and benefits more heavily than those farther in the future
83
New cards
temporal discount rate
how much we value near rewards compared to distant rewards
84
New cards
vmPFC (OFC) and ventral striatum
temporal discounting is associated with activation in what 2 brain regions
85
New cards
subjective value
objective value of the outcome weighted by the perceived likelihood plus individual level of risk/ambiguity aversion, individuals discount rate, and personal factors
86
New cards
salience network
network involved in orienting attention to surprising, salient, or important events
87
New cards
ACC, anterior insula, vmPFC, supramarginal gyrus
4 brain regions involved in salience network
88
New cards
frontoparietal network
network involved in coordinating goal-oriented attention and behavior
89
New cards
dlPFC and posterior parietal lobe
2 brain regions involved in frontoparietal network
90
New cards
dlPFC
brain region involved in goal directed planning and action, WM
91
New cards
insula
brain region involved in ambiguity aversion
92
New cards
IOFC and vmPFC
brain regions (2) involved in subjective value
93
New cards
ACC
brain region involved in response and conflict resolution
94
New cards
NAcc
brain region involved in motivation reward and value learning
95
New cards
dorsal stream
stream involved in potential action
96
New cards
ventral stream
stream involved with object identity
97
New cards
NAcc
adolescents have proliferation of dopamine receptors in what brain region
98
New cards
risk sensitivity theory
theory that when an animal’s caloric intake is high, they are more risk-averse (prefer low-risk/low-reward), and as energy budget declines, become risk-seeking (prefer high-risk, high-reward)
99
New cards
high-value
low SES children ALWAYS pick risky option when there is a ______ reward, while high SES kids pick the risky option 2/3 of times
100
New cards
high SES
who is more risk averse? low or high SES