1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
ethics
systematic study of what a person’s conduct and actions should be regarding self, others, and the environment
what is right vs. wrong or good vs. bad
what life should be vs. what it really is
moral conduct and principles to guide actions
moral indifference
individual questions why morality in practice is even necessary
moral uncertainty
AKA moral conflict
individual unsure which more principles or values apply or may not know what moral problem is
moral distress
individual knows the right thing to do but organizational constraints make it difficult to take the right course of action
moral outrage
individual witnesses immoral act of another but feels powerless to stop it
ethical dilemmas
described as being forced to choose between 2 or more undesirable alternatives
utilitarian
teleologic
consequentialist theory
decisions are made with the goal of providing the greatest good for the greatest number of people
decision making based on what provides greatest good for greatest number of people
needs and wants of the individual are diminished
OUTCOME determines the morality of the intervention
end can justify the means
rights based
deontologic
individuals have basic inherent rights that should not be interfered with during decision making
individuals have basic inherent rights that should not be interfered with during decision making
some things are just a person’s just due
duty based
deontologic
decisions are made because one has a duty to do something or to refrain from doing something
individuals have basic inherent rights that should not be interfered with during decision making
some decisions must be made because one has a duty
a ‘duty of care’ is an obligation to avoid doing something, that could possibly lead to the harm of another person
intuitionist
deontologic
issues are weighed on a case-by-case basis to determine relative goals, duties, and rights
decision maker can review each ethical problem or issue on case-by-case basis
weigh goals, duties, and rights
based on intuition: what decision maker believes is right for that specific situation
ethical relativism
individuals make decisions based only on what seems right or reasonable according to their value system or culture
ethical universalism
ethical principles are universal and constant
decision making should not vary based on circumstances or cultural differences
autonomy
to respect individual freedoms, preferences, and rights
promotes self-determination and freedom of choice
beneficence
do good for patients; promote good
advocate for patient
coordinate care amongst HCP
nonmaleficence
prevent harm
provide high-quality evidence-based care
paternalism
one individual assumes right to make decisions for another
limits freedom of choice - only use to prevent harm?
utility
good of many outweighs the wants or needs of the individual
justice
to be fair, treat people equally
treat “unequals” according to their differences
remove barriers to health such as financial status
veracity
obligation to tell truth
avoid misleading or deceiving patient
being transparent
informed consent
fidelity
to respect our words and duty to patients; keep our promise
explicit vs. implicit promises
confidentiality
keep privileged information private
health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA)
assault and battery
can involve lack of adequate consent (informed or implied)
battery - actual touching of person without consent for action
consent for nursing measures
patient must be informed before making decision
does not require exhaustive explanation for each situation
may be verbal or implied
patient free to refuse any aspect of care offered
careful documentation required following patient’s refusal of care
consent for medical treatment
may be verbal or written, but written preferred
ensure consent was informed
doesn’t appear well-informed? RN must notify provider further info is needed
consent can be withdrawn by patient at ANY time
emergency? provider can invoke implied consent “for best interest” of patient but should be validated by another provider
code of ethics and professional standards
set of principles to guide the individual practitioner
general values, duties, and responsibilities for role of a nurse
highest standards of ethical practice
first written 1950 by ANA
revised every 10 years
types of problem-solving processes
traditional problem-solving process
nursing process
moral decision-making model
moral decision-making model
M: massage the dilemma
O: outline options
R: review criteria and resolve
A: affirm position and act
L: look back