1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Weather vs climate
Weather = the temperature and precipitation at a specific time and place
Climate = weather in a location averaged over long periods of time
Climate change vs climate variability
Climate change = sustained change in the average long-term levels of temperature and precipitation
Clime variability = sustained change in the long-term variance around these average levels
Environmental change
Broader concept, can result from oil spills, lang degradation, deforestation, etc.
When is climate change expected to take place?
Climate change is expected to be paralleled by increases in extreme weather events (e.g. heat waves), rising sea levels, more (intense) floods & droughts, resulting in degradation of land & fresh water resources, lower food security, etc.
Why does climate change matter to demographers?
Climate change is more concerning than other aspects of demography such as fertility or immigration
Demography’s role in climate change: Formula
I = PAT
Impact = Population, Affluence, Technology
Demography’s role in climate change: Facts
Population growth parallels increases in economic growth, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
The net effect of a 1% increase in population growth on increases in carbon emissions has been estimated to be around 1% (keeping every other variable fixed)
Does, next to its size, the composition of a population also matter (through different consumption and emission behaviors)?
How (changes in) population composition mitigate climate change
Population ageing should generally drive carbon emissions down (due to changes in consumption patterns and reduced labor productivity)
But: larger share of expenditures in carbon intensive items
Population aging may be good for climate change
Urbanization
Increase in economic scale, technical innovation, action to information (eco-friendly actions), efficient land and energy use and lower fertility
Reduction in carbon emissions
Rising labor productivity and incomes, “urbanized” lifestyles and consumption patterns
Increase in carbon emissions
Evidence/projections thus provide mixed results (dependence on period/region and short-vs long-term perspectives)
Education
Positive association with more “eco-friendly” consumer choices at any given level of income
Reduction in people’s vulnerability and strengthening of adaptive capacity (to less-favorable conditions)
Fosters economic growth and – importantly – reduces fertility
Fertility decline
Slows population growth
Reduction of pressure on livelihoods
Frees resources that can be used to cope with climate change
Population policies: a suitable response to climate change?
Embedded in a broader set of development policies, population policies and programs promoting education + universal access to voluntary contraception and addressing demographic factors such as urbanization and aging will contribute to a more sustainable demographic future that plays a crucial role in climate change mitigation and adaptation
Maybe: European demographers are highly divided on the questions:
Whether the global population size should be reduced to lower CO 2 emissions
Whether family planning is an effective policy instrument
Climate change & fertility
Relatively little empirical research yet, but several plausible pathways linking climate change and fertility
Effects on economic development, such as sectoral change (agriculture)
Effects on (child) mortality and migration
Effects on armed conflicts
Hajdu & Hajdu (2021) conclude that “exposure to heat in the pre-conception period has detrimental impacts on fertility”
Heat-related mortality
Between 1991-2018, 37% of all warm-season heat-related deaths in 43 countries could be attributed to anthropogenic climate change
By the end of this century, climate change (reflected in ‘very hot days’) is projected to increase age-adjusted US mortality rates by 3%
But: Between 1900-2004, the mortality impact of days by a mean temperature >27°C declined by 75% (almost exclusively post-1960)
This decline in the US almost entirely results from the diffusion of residential air conditioning
Residential energy consumption is expected to increase by 11% over the course of this century
Cold-related mortality
Reductions in cold-related mortality may (initially) outweigh increases in heat-related mortality
Projections of temperature-related mortality for the UK
By the 2050s, heat-related deaths would rise by around 257% (in the absence of adaptation); cold-related mortality would decline by 2%
But: cold burden remains higher than the heat burden in all periods!
Population aging as an amplifier: oldest-old population at highest risk!
Climate change, air pollution and mortality
Substantial global increase in e.g. ozone-related mortality due to climate change
Africa as exception, India & East Asia most affected by ozone-related mortality
Amplifying effect of population aging
Climatic influences on infectious diseases
If global warming amplifies “El Niño” type phenomena, regions surrounding the Pacific and Indian oceans are expected to be the most vulnerable ones with higher incidences of diseases
Malaria (South America), rift valley fever (East Africa), dengue fever (Thailand), cholera (Bangladesh), ...
Adaptation: Early warning systems for heatwaves and for expected outbreaks of infectious diseases
3 categories of “environmental migrants”
Temporarily displaced because of environmental stress (usually natural disasters)
Permanently displaced and resettled in a new area
Internal migrants due to deterioration of the resource base in their original habitat
“Environmental refugees”
People forced to leave their traditional habitat, temporarily or permanently, because of a marked environmental disruption (natural and/or triggered by mankind) jeopardizing their existence and/or seriously affecting their quality of life
Projected numbers
Increase from ~25M at the turn of the millenium to ~200M in 2050
Evidence base is “varied and patchy”, ranging from “substantial” to “minor” impact of climate change on human migration
Fielding (2011) concluded that the impacts of environmental change on internal migration in the UK will probably be relatively minor
Exception that greater river and coastal flooding is likely to render some areas hazardous to settlement and/or very costly to protect
Environmental change has the potential to affect directly following aspects:
The hazardousness of a place
The migration indirectly through economic and political (e.g. conflicts about water) drivers
The effect of the environment is highly dependent on the economic, political, social and demographic context
Future consequences
Future environmental change will only have an incremental direct impact on (international) migration flows
It will rather amplify (or alter) existing demographic trends of migration.
In less developed countries adverse weather/climate conditions are more likely to stimulate internal and shorter distance moves or even to “trap” populations in place costs of migration
Migration can be both a problematic outcome of climate change and a key element for the adaptation to and management of environmental risks
Adapt in place –help communities stay in place where local adaptation options are viable and sensible
Enable mobility–for people who need to move away from unavoidable climate risks (and ensure that sending and receiving areas are adequately prepared)