Pros to baleage
forages harvested at higher moisture content (decreases curing time)
Good for spring cutting of annual ryegrass/crimson clover or tall fescue
Minimal spoilage and weathering of \n the baleage as long as the plastic is \n not torn \n – Baleage often has higher palatability \n than dry hay
Cons to baleage
Stored forage remains an expensive commodity. Increased equipment needs and cost for baleage
Wrapping bales will slow the baling process and/or increase labor needs
Wrapping plastic must be handled and discarded appropriately
Poor quality forage that is ensiled as baleage is still poor quality forage
Crop types for silage
Hay crop silages
Forage grasses and or legumes, winter grains
Grain crop silages
Corn or grain sorghum
corn is good bc it ensiles really well and you get a lot (harvest at 65% moisture)
Types of hay crop silage
Grasses, alfalfa, wheat, barley, rye, ryegrass
Chopped from standing crop, taken to silo
Forage too wet ~80 % water
Favor Clostridia (loss of DM)
Butyric acid formation (smells bad!)
Slow to ensile, longer to reach safe pH
Water drains out (seepage)
Removes soluble nutrients
Wilted hay crop silage ~ 65-55% moisture
Corn makes high quality silage
Under anaerobic conditions carbohydrates make organic acids instead of respiring to CO2
Corn has lots of carbohydrates
Acidifies quickly
Wider moisture harvest window
Relatively stable silage
Standing corn is harvested when it has field-dried down to 65% moisture
Theoretical length of cut (Corn silage)
Chopper not fitted with an on-board processor
Use chopping or knives to break up cob and kernel
3/8 inch theoretical length of cut
Chopper with kernel processor
3/4 inch of theoretical length of cut
Processor setting is anywhere from 1 to 2 mm
A properly adjusted kernel processor:
Damages more than 90% of the \n kernels
Pulverize cob pieces
Minimizes waste in the feed bunk
Allows for longer length of cut
Longer fiber
Less power consumption
Feeding rate
The recommended minimum removal rate is 12” per day
At no time should more than three days worth of silage be exposed
Always close the bag off after each feeding
Open bags cause billowing plastic that pumps air over the silage
Removal method
With a bucket scrape the silage from the top
Allow it to fall to the floor
Avoid methods that result in dislodging the face
Creating gouges, cracks, and potholes
Air penetrates deep into the silage
Heifer
female bovine that has not calved
Cow
used after calving, calve at 24 months of age roughly once per year, milks for about 10 months, dry for roughly 2 months, calving induces lactation
lactation
time between calving (think lactation curve)
1st lactation cow
has had one calf, in her first lactation
first breeding
15 months of age
first calf
24 months
gestation length
9 months, 283 days
breed again
27 months of age
second calving
36 months
transition cows
+/- three weeks of calving (prior to and after)
Factors involved in the lactation curves
milk produced
amount of feed eaten
body weight
cows have a higher DM intake during the start of lactation
cows also use up a lot of their stored body fat at the start of lactation (to make up for a deficit of energy collected from the feed)
Feed efficiency (MIlk/DMI)
on average it is 1.5
higher at the start of lactation (where they make the most money bc the cow is using the fat reserves for energy)
low (losing money) at the end of lactation where less milk is taken up
Stall density
lactating cows 100-120%
transition cows 80-100% (no more than 100% bc fights)
Feed bunk information in a stall
feed available at least 26 hrs a day
want it there when they come back from milking
feeding time: day to day
push 4-6 times a day
lactating cows need 24 in of bunk space
close-up and fresh cows need 30 in of bunk space
Feeding frequency
1x is ok in fall/winter/spring
2-3x in summer/humid months
Feedbunk scoring
How much feed should we offer?
average of 5% of refusals
3-5% fresh cows
1-5% early lactation/high producing
0-5% late lactation
what do you do with the refusals?
discard low quality
if feed is still quality … feed to small groups, steers, etc
Reasons for variable feed intake
TMR dry matter (might be an incorrect dry matter amount)
Number of animals in the pen (if there aren’t as many as you thought you were feeding, there will be more food left over)
Forage quality (lower qual = feed left behind)
Animal (Heat Stress) and TMR temperature
feed at night
feed several times a day
use chemical preservatives
Formulating dairy cow diets
Goals:
to meet the cow’s nutritional needs while maintaining health
to optimize milk production, milk fat, and milk protein
accomplished economically
all rations should contain at least 1 feed from each category:
forage
grains
protein supplements
minerals
salt
Excess fiber in the diet can result in:
low milk production
DMI lower than expected
high milk fat percent
early lactation cows fed too high forage and low energy of rations may be more prone to ketosis and have rapid body weight loss
A deficiency of fiber can result in:
acidosis, cows going off feed and fluctuating drying matter intake
low milk fat percentage
cows not chewing their cud
Fats, minerals, and vitamins
total fat should not go above 7% of the diet DM
no more than 2% added fat should be from: animal, vegetable, or rumen inert
salt: cows need 3-4oz of salt per day
one ounce plus 1 ounce for every 25lbs of milk
calcium: 0.75-1% of DM diet
phosphorus: 0.35 to 0.40% of DM diet
need Vitamin A, D, and E
Water
60 to 80% from drinking water, 25-35% from water/moisture in field
Cows should consume 3-5lbs of water per lbs of DMI
50 lbs of DMI at 4 lbs of water = 200 lbs of water per day or 25 gallons per day (divide lbs by 8)
2-4 in of perimeter space per cow
water depth at min of 2 in
at least 2 watering locations per pen to prevent dominant cows from guarding waterer
water tank should be located within 50 feet of the feed bunk or at every crossover in a freestall barn
water should be immediately accessible after returning from milking
Signs of CHO unbalance
lack of persistency in lactation curve
laminitis
liquid manure
inc incidence of ketosis, displace abomasum and repro problems
reduction in DMI and milk fat content (protein: fat inversion)
protein level in milk is higher than the fat
Nitrates Toxicity
Nitrates are the primary form of available N in soil
plants take more up in droughts
Taken up by plant roots
From organic and inorganic sources
Metabolized into plant proteins
Toxic when animals consume large amounts of nitrate when animals consume large amounts of nitrate
Safe when < than 0.44% of DM
From 0.44 to 1.5% dilute with feed low in nitrates from 0.44 to 1.5% dilute with feed low in nitrates
1.5% do not feed
nitrates in high lvls = toxic for ruminants
Why does this matter? \n Nitrate toxicity in ruminants
Nitrate Accumulation
certain plants have a higher potential for accumulation
Environmental conditions that prevent nitrate metabolism
Drought and frost conditions
Decreased light (cloudy weather, early in the day)
Decreased temperature
Nitrate Accumulating Crop Plants
Tall fescue
drought tolerant
tolerates moderately poor soil drainage
adapted to piedmont, mountains of SC
tolerates wide ranges of soil pH
reproductive phase in April-early June
vegetative the rest of the year
Unique prob. with tall fescue
desirable attributes are due to endophytic fungus
inside the plant
costs the beef industry from $600 million to 1 billion annually
Tall fescue endophyte
no visible plant symptoms of fungal infectio
beneficial effect on grass
reduce grazing in late spring
forage accumulation > summer survival
inc leaf rolling
alkaloids with anti-insect properties
inc germination rate and tiller growth
fescue becomes more persistent
selection/adaptation advantage
fungus produces mycotoxins (ergot alkaloid ergovaline) that cause health problems for grazers
Symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis
reduced intake
reduced weight gain and milk prod
vasoconstriction at extremities
fescue foot → mainly during cold weather
inc body core temp
exacerbated during hot weather (summer slump)
animals spend more time cooling than grazing
inc resp
lowered hr
altered fat metabolism
fat necrosis intestinal tract
affected cattle typically have “rough hair coats”
conception rates <50% in beef cattle
horse: prolonged gestation length, late gestation abortion, dystocia, thickened placenta, agalactia
Ketosis
conditions associated with intense fat mobilization un cattle
elevated conc. of ketone bodies in all bodily fluids
acetone, acetoacetate, beta-hydroxybutyrate
cows with ketosis can be identified via routine testing using appropriate cow side blood, milk ($$$), or urine tests
the most efficacious treatment for ketosis is oral drenching of propylene glycol
Fatty liver
results from a state of negative energy balance
imp metabolic diseases of post parturient dairy cows
fatty liver at calving is commonly associated with:
ketosis
feed intake depression and dec milk prod
excessive triglyceride accumulation in liver cells results in disturbed liver function
avoiding over conditioning cattle
dry period, avg BCS of 3-3.5
over conditioned cattle (BCS > 4) should not be feed restricted because this will promote fat mobilization
Body Condition Score (BCS)
less than 3: angle between hooks and pins is a V
greater than 3: angle is U shaped
honestly from there look over the guide from lab
ie if you see ribs it’s in the 2s
if its round probably in the 4s
Milk Fever
aka parturient paresis
acute to peracute, afebrile, flaccid paralysis of mature dairy cows that:
occurs most commonly at or soon after parturition
can contribute to dystocia, uterine prolapse, retained fetal membranes, metritis, abomasal displacement, and mastitis
restore normal serum calcium levels as soon as possible
IV injection of a calcium gluconate salt
prevention:
dec blood pH by dietary cation-anion difference
reduce K in the diet or add anionic salts
Left Displaced abomasum (DA) (90% of DA)
Abomasum occasionally may be displaced to the left of the rumen and upwards when its muscular wall loses tone, and the stomach becomes filled with gas
Low forage diets and sudden changes in grain feeding levels may result in DA
Clinical signs include anorexia and decreased milk production
Treatment cost ($100300 per case)
Treated cows produce ~800 lbs. less the next month
Permanent correction is best achieved by surgically entering the abdomensurgically entering the abdomen
Sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA)
periods of moderately depressed ruminal pH ranging from 5.5-5.8
decreased milk prod and efficiency of milk prod
premature culling, in death loss
prevalence of SARA in dairy herds estimated at 19-29% in lactating cows
hard to detect, can occur for many reasons (nutrition big reason tho)
Regulation of rumen pH
Typical pattern of rumen pH variation during the day
Specific signs associated with \n SARA
Digital dermatitis
leading cause of lameness
~$150-200 per case in the form of treatment costs and lost production
needs a bacteria found on healthy skin, a point of entry, and moisture to grow
manure is a good skin conditioner
prevention and control of infections/lesions
footbath programs
copper sulfate solutions commonly used
hoof trimming
2x per year, at dry of and again around 90-120 DIM
heifer 6-8 wks before calving
use hygiene scoring to help determine ideal footbath frequency
Prevention of SARA
proper particle size in the TMR
promotes saliva prod
feed bunk mngmnt
minimize competition
do not feed excess of rapidly fermentable CHO
add buffers to the TMR
sodium bicarb
potassium carbonate
Locomotion scoring
Effect of laminatis on milk yield
Milking Parlor Types and Designs
What is the desired milking routine?
Adequate amount of time required to perform the pre-milking work routine on each cow
Too big will encourage short cuts in the milking routine
Too small will result in bored workers and early unit attachment
Who will be operating the parlor? The skill level and motivation level of the people in the parlor will determine how efficiently the milking routine will be implemented
Will the parlor be used as a place to provide special treatment to cows?
What is the expected production level, milking interval and cow grouping strategy?
What sort of work environment do you want to provide for the operators and cows?
Support arms for milking units and milk hoses and some do not
Support arms carry the weight of the cluster and hoses so that operators do not have to
Even weight distribution on each quarter that promotes even milk-out while reducing the number of slips and unit falloffs
Tandem
one single return lane
cows stand nose to tail inside individual stalls
milker has side on vantage point of udder
cows released one at a time
no waiting for slow cows to finish
good for dairies up to 400 cows
Parallel
stand parallel to each other
leaves one access point for the milker to reach udder (rear)
milking doesnt begin until all cows are in their stalls and they are released from the parlor at one time
have to wait on slow cows
Herringbone
most common design
cattle at 45 degree angle
different access than parallel or tandem
cows are calm as they can see others
when one cow slow … the others can slow down
Rotary
like carousel rides for cows
milking stalls are arranged in large circle on a platform that rotates slowly
cows walk in and finish milking by the time they complete 1-2 laps
milker can stay in one place instead of having to wak
expensive
Automatic milking systems
prior to 1920, US farmers milked by hand
one person = 4 cows per hour
first commercial robot in Europe in 1990s
robot milking sys automate the entire milking process and single-box robotic systems can do about 50-70 cows per day
more flexible for farmers
cows experience less physical stress
Types of automatic milking systems
Robotic-rotary sys:
milk groups of cows, much like conventional farm
enables to milk more cows per hour
more $$$ than box
Robotic box-milking sys:
well-suited to individual cow mngmnt and cow care
precision feeding → can add feed to diets given in there
might need additional infrastructure (new buildings, etc)
Holding area Size
Minimize amount of time cows spend standing in the holding area away from feed and resting areas
Time will depend on the number of milking's per day, climate and production level
Recommendations:
60 minutes, 45 minutes and 30 minutes for two, three or four time a day milking
Total of about two hours per day
Income Over Feed Costs
One of numerous financial performance indicators that managers can apply to support profitable decision-making
Is defined as the portion of income from milk sold that remains after paying for purchased and farm-raised feed used to produce milk
We must know three parameters:
milk yield (lbs/cow/day)
milk price ($/cwt)
feed costs ($/cow/day)
IOFC on a herd vs cow basis
IOFC on a herd basis can give a more accurate indication of the financial performance of the herd than calculating IOFC on an individual cow basis
Example: Difference between produced and shipped milk
Dairy herd with 360 milking cows, 19 of which are in the sick pen with their milk discarded
But fed the same diet as the healthy cows
Assume that all cows (i.e., sick and non-sick) are fed the diet described in table 1
IOFC on lactating vs dry cows
In the herd there is a group of dry cows (i.e., no lactating cows) that also needs to be fed, although they generate no income
Herd A with 86 milking cows and 14 dry cows
Herd B with 80 milking cows and 20 dry cows
Using IOFC as a decision making tool
Herd managers might decide to stop milking a cow earlier than expected when IOFC equals zero
“as long as it pays its feed, it will be milked”
Drying cows in advance because of a neutral or negative IOFC can be more expensive than keeping them milking
a high proportion of lactating or milking cows will not necessarily translate into greater IOFC
having a balanced proportion of dry cows, typically btwn 14-16% of the herd, implies that new calving or freshening are expected
new cows entering the herd should be translated into high-producing lactating cows which should lead to highly efficient cows
IOFC summary
monitor IOFC freq
esp with scenarios of low milk prices, high commodities prices, or both
est IOFC on both an individual-cow and a lactating-herd basis
est IOFC considering non-lactating cows
the best use of IOFC is to benchmark against the goals of the farm itself and not with other farms
diffs btwn farms related to multiple factors such as pricing of forages, pricing of purchased or farm grown grains, or milk price
Colostrum Management
Q - quantify → 10g/L to consider that the PTI (passive transfer of immunity) occurred → greater than 5.5 g/dL when using refractometer
Q - quality → 50 g IgG/L - over 23% of the Bricks on the refractometer, 18-23% would be a supplemented with other things
Q - quantity → 150 g of IgG - no specific liquid volume
Q - quickly → want to feed within the time frame of less than 2 hours after birth, also want to milk the mother in less than 2 hours after calving
Q - quite clean → want less than 100,000 cfu/mL of bacteria → cleaner the colostrum, the better the chance of survival
Reasons for bad quality colostrum
nutrition
how quickly the cow was milked after calving
genetics/age/breed
environment
disease status
stress and handling
water quality (big)
What step of the Qs can you make the biggest difference in?
the “quite clean”
the more clean = less bacteria, less bacteria = greater chance of survival
Measure bacteria using the ATP bioluminescence measure
Things that cows and calves go through during the birth process:
Cow Must:
Produce Colostrum
Change Diet
Make A LOT of Milk
Switch Pens
Etc., etc., etc.,
Calf Must:
Initiate Breathing
Regulate Acid/Base Balance
Control Own Temperature
Begin Metabolic Processes
Consume Colostrum
Why do we remove calves quickly after birth?
your lowest death loss is seen in calves taken from the mother within 2-6 hours
the longer you wait, the higher the death loss
Right after calving you do what to the calf …
free the navel of bedding and dirt
dip the exposed navel in a <7% Iodine Tincture (Iodine and Alcohol, the latter dries it out)
this disinfects the navel and keeps it from being a source of infection for the calf
Esophageal groove
closes off access to the rumen when a calf suckles, allowing colostrum to bypass the rumen and go straight to the abomasum
10 g/L of colostrum vs < 10 g/L of colostrum
5% difference between how many calves are lost just due to the amount of PTI (passive transfer of immunity) that occurs from the colostrum
Goal with calves:
double the body weight by 60 days of age
Pre-weaning calf diet
mostly milk
concentrate included
arge chunks of grain that help the calf begin to build its rumen environment (going from essentially being monogastrics at birth, with a large abomasum, to being ruminants with a large rumen)
when deciding to wean the calf … base off of the % of grain intake, not anything else
start off on about 4 Qts of milk, then up to 8 Qts to help them gain weight, and then when they reach a decent “ideal” weight, bring them down in the amount of milk in steps (8→4, 4→2, 2→0) (prevents acidosis or scours)
If you feed calves better …
you’ll get better milk production
NOTES ON PRE-WEANING PROGRAM
Every farm is different!!
Offer starter (concentrate) and water free choice from day 1 of life
Can house individually the entire time or in groups
Calves should be consuming 1.5 kg starter before removing milk and consume starter for 1-week post-weaning before switching to grower
22-24% protein in milk replacer adequate
22-24% protein in starter, 18-22% protein in grower
Starch content of starter 35-45%
Weaning:
First Step = Reduce Milk by 25 – 50%
Second Step = Reduce Milk to 50 – 25% of original
When feeding less milk, may only need one weaning step
Need to feed calves near their body temperature …
body temp anywhere from 101-101.5, so you prepare your feed at anywhere from 100-110.
want your solids % to be the same every single day when preparing feed
Milk Replacer vs Whole Milk
cost of milk
cost of milk replacer
Milk is 12.5% solids
whole milk has less protein, less fat, and a majorly different lactose difference compared to milk replacer
variation in lactose fed = diarrhea, scours, bloat, etc
rule of four - take the two listed above and multiply by 4 to find out whichever is the better/more economical buy
whichever number is lower
whole milk is also lower in the trace mineral content in comparison to milk replacer
mineral content is huge and can save calves/a farm!
Goals for calves/calf farm:
< 10% who get respiratory disease
< 15% who get scours/diarrhea
< 3% (2%) death loss
Group vs Individual Housing for Calves
both have advantages and disadvantages but ! listed in the table, they emphasized this in class so definitely focus on it a bit more!
you want one hutch width between hutches
Post-wean goals
you want to make sure that animals are gaining weight at an appropriate rate so that puberty can occur at a specific time (bc its body weight based), that way they can calve at the time desired
What do we feed in a post-wean diet and prior to calving?
Post-weaning diet composition
protein req: goes down as growth slows, need protein for colostrum production
fiber req: goes up to ensure proper rumen function and buffering, DMI
energy req goes down to ensure proper body condition
higher energy in diet = a larger condition score = harder to breed and likely to have diseases at calving
target BCS score to the side - KNOW THIS