Global Social Problems Week 2 (Socio-Economic Fault Lines: Inequality, Poverty, and Development)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:06 PM on 1/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

10 Terms

1
New cards

income inequality among regions

-uneven growth- while a few regions converge with higher income countries, many remain stagnant or have declined

-GNI (gross national income) per capita of low income countries is only about one sixtieth of high income countries

-

2
New cards

wealth inequality among regions

-income vs wealth

  • income is an amount received over a period of timer, wealth is the net assets, both financial and nonfinancial minus debt

-wealth inequalities are greater than income inequalities

-the more wealth in a region or country, the more it can invest in its people

3
New cards

inequality of income within countries

-explosive income growth is the main reason for the increase in inequality

-productivity drivers growth, but productivity and worker compensation do not necessarily grow together

  • ex. china

4
New cards

impacts of global poverty and inequality

-UN Development Program

  • measures and tracks indicators on which the quality of life and life chances depend

-the foundation of life chances: good health, education, food, shelter, wealth, income

5
New cards

quality of life along levels of development

-the bottom of the pyramid

  • the forgotten, the unorganized, but the indispensable units of economic power (FDR)

  • referred to bankrupt farmers and workers

  • top down economic plans

  • Roosevelt wanted to help these people

6
New cards

origins of contemporary inequality among nations

-Industrial Revolution

  • prior to the industrial revolution, all societies were poor, few elites

-Three sectors of economic activity

  • Primary (agricultural)

  • Secondary (manufacturing)

  • Tertiary (service)

-argument that people are poor because they are lazy

  • broadly false

  • people in low levels of development often work harder than wealthy societies, but work for less money

7
New cards

factors influencing varying levels of development

-extractive institutions and inequality

  • extractive institutions did not support long term development and did not disappear with the end of colonization

  • North America developed inclusive (direct rule) institutions

  • The type of institution a society developed made the biggest differences in industrialization

8
New cards

Factors Influencing Varying levels of development

1) Diversity and conflict

  • diversity can inhibit many developing countries

2) Corruption

  • Endemic to inequality and underdevelopment

  • Corrodes public trust, undermines the rule of law, bribery and kleptocracy, and excludes poor people from public services

3) The Resource Curse

  • Many countries that are rich in resources are poor

  • “Dutch disease”- become overdependent on a source, mismanage it

  • Resources are not always a curse

    • depends on human agency

    • depends on the governance strucutre

4) Climate Change

  • Costs include adapting agriculture, preventing and treating increases in vector-borne diseases, and harm to trade and fisheries

  • Contributes to violent conflict

    • drought and food insecurity

    • terrorist groups

5) The Global Economy

  • participating in the global economy is essential for lifting countries out of poverty

  • openness to the global economy is positively related to human development

9
New cards

Varying pathways to development

-societies exist across the continuum of development

  • developed countries diverged at the time of industrial revolution

  • others took off and are slowly growing

-slow growth or income traps?

  • the explosion of growth in the 2000s lifted many countries and people out of poverty and into the low income status

  • moving from middle to upper income is progressing more slowly

10
New cards

How do we fight poverty and inequality?

1) no one size fits all answer to any global problem

  • the Washington consensus- called this bc Washington is the base for all the big organizations of the world, answer for everything based on the US model (free trade, free market)

  • providing people with equal life chances is increasingly recognized as a human right

    • this requires addressing the needs of the poor (programs and policies for inclusive and sustainable growth)

2) National Governments

  • social welfare programs cover a few of the poorest people in the poorest nations

  • economic growth is not the best measure of the health of the global or domestic economy

3) Equal Access to the tools of success

  • ex. education- competing in a global economy requires skills and knowledge, lifelong learning and skill training need to be available to all people

  • recognizing the value of unpaid work could be a critical step in reducing poverty

    • household production has a slight correlation with income

4) Intergovernmental and Non-governmental Aid Organizations

  • Third world debt has crippled many nations

  • Foreign aid as a mixed record of success

    • puts more money into poverty reduction efforts

    • comes with conditionality- transparency, fragmentation, selectivity

5) The Private Sector

  • microfinance

    • the poor do not have access to the same financial services as middle or upper class

    • not everyone needs thousands of dollars to start a successful business

      • microlenders have a repayment rate close to 99% and range from US $100- 1500

  • patient capitalism

    • Investment Strategy developed by Novogratz

      • Acumen fund- Investing in worthwhile projects was better than fast cash that produced no value

      • She looks for investments that will make a profit and contribute social value to communities

      • $300,000- 2.5 million

6) Fair Trade

  • Global trade has lifted many people out of poverty

  • Free trade is not always fair trade