Studied by 50 people

0.0(0)

get a hint

hint

Tags & Description

0%

71 Terms

1

New cards

Four Steps of Hypothesis Testing

state hypothesis

critical values

Collect and calculate data

make decisions

New cards

2

New cards

what must one always remember when writing their hypothesis statement

always write it in terms of the population

New cards

3

New cards

anti-hypothesis; no treatment effect or significant differences took place

null hypothesis (Ho)

New cards

4

New cards

treatment will cause a change or significant difference; there can be multiple

alternative hypothesis (H1)

New cards

5

New cards

looking for values that fall into the extreme 5%,1, or .1% of scores

alpha level

New cards

6

New cards

composed of the extreme values that are very unlikely to be obtained if the null hypothesis is true

critical region

New cards

7

New cards

what happens when critical region becomes smaller

values are more towards extreme ends of distribution

New cards

8

New cards

what happens as alpha level decreases

probability of type I error happening decreases

New cards

9

New cards

two tailed vs one tailed

two tailed is a nondirectional test because it doesn't tell us what direction the difference is

one tailed is directional test because it tells us whether there is an increase or decrease

New cards

10

New cards

Standard Error Formula

Om = o/√n

New cards

11

New cards

Z Score formula for sample mean

Z= m-M/Om

New cards

12

New cards

what do we do when we answer yes to step four of the hypothesis method

reject the null

New cards

13

New cards

what do we do when we answer no to step four of the hypothesis method

fail to reject null

New cards

14

New cards

as sample size increases

standard error (Om) decreases

New cards

15

New cards

Cohen's D

mean difference/ standard deviation

New cards

16

New cards

small Cohen's D

d ≤ .2

New cards

17

New cards

medium Cohen's D

.2 ≤ d .≤ 8

New cards

18

New cards

large Cohen's D

d ≥ .8

New cards

19

New cards

explain the term most conservative

-score that is furthest from the mean -by choosing z score that farther from mean, you're reducing likelyhood of committing type I error

New cards

20

New cards

when you have a one tailed directional test you're more likely to

reject the null

New cards

21

New cards

when given the opportunity, one should more likely pick a

one tailed test bc you're less likely to commit a type II error

New cards

22

New cards

Type I Error

-determined by ALPHA LVL -considered worst type of error -incorrectly rejected a true null -when one claims there's a treatment effect but in reality there is not -ex. sending an innocent person to jail

New cards

23

New cards

Type II Error

-failed to reject a true null -we thought there was not treatment effect but there was -determined by calculating BETA, works w/ Power -ex. setting a guilty person free

New cards

24

New cards

tells one the likelihood that one will correctly reject a false null

Power

New cards

25

New cards

how do we determine Beta

1-Power= Beta

New cards

26

New cards

as mean difference increases

test statistic and rejecting the null both increase

New cards

27

New cards

as mean difference decreases

test statistic and rejecting the null both decrease

New cards

28

New cards

as standard deviation(o) and standard error (Om) both increase

test statistic and rejecting the null both decrease

New cards

29

New cards

as standard deviation(o) and standard error (Om) both decrease

test statistic and rejecting the null both increase

New cards

30

New cards

as sample sizes increases

standard error (Om), test statistic, and rejecting the null all increase

New cards

31

New cards

Assumptions of Z Score Testing

Random Sampling: independent random sampling & random sampling with replacement

Independence of Observations: each individual's score is independent of each other, it doesn't impact the other

Value of Pop. Standard Dev. isn't changed by treatment: how we calculate error

Normal distributions: is sample size is 30 or greater or if it comes from normal distribution population

New cards

32

New cards

reporting results for a z statistic

"In a sample, n=6, it was found that (fancy words), z= +3.40, p<.05".

New cards

33

New cards

Single Sample T test

when we don't have population variance we use sample variance

New cards

34

New cards

estimated standard error formula

Sm= √ s2/n

New cards

35

New cards

Formula for Single Sample T test

t= m-M/Sm

New cards

36

New cards

When do we use a Z score and when do we use a T test

-if you have population standard dev -> Z score -if you don't have population standard dev. & working with single sample -> T test

New cards

37

New cards

when sample statistic doesn't accurately affect population parameter

biased statistic

New cards

38

New cards

Larger the sample size and degrees of freedom

more closely proportionationated will those scores math to the Unit Normal Table

New cards

39

New cards

smaller the sample size and degrees of freedom

more flattened out the t distribution will be

New cards

40

New cards

sample variance formula

s2= ss/df

New cards

41

New cards

percentage of variance explained

-r2 -percentage of variance due to treatment

New cards

42

New cards

r2 formula

r2= t2/ t2 + df

New cards

43

New cards

small r2

0.01 < r2 < 0.09

New cards

44

New cards

medium r2

0.09 < r2 < 0.25

New cards

45

New cards

large r2

r2 > 0.25

New cards

46

New cards

results statement for a single sample t test

" The participants averaged m=5 with a SD=4 on the happiness scale. Statistical analysis found that (more fancy words I should be asleep right now rrrriiiiiipppppppp), t(8-df)=3.00, p<0.5, r2= 24.56%'.

New cards

47

New cards

Assumptions about single sample t test

independence of observations: scores are independent thus they don't affect each other

normal population distributions: sample size of 30+ or comes from normal population distribution

New cards

48

New cards

Independent measures of between subjects t test

-two separate samples and we're comparing the means together -big clue if you have two different data sets ( n1,n2,SS1,SS2)

New cards

49

New cards

stating the hypothesis for a Independent measures of between subjects t test

null: M1-M2 = 0 alt: M1-M2 ≠ 0

New cards

50

New cards

DF for Independent measures of between subjects t test

since you have two samples, you add the two DF DF= df1 + df2

New cards

51

New cards

Pooled Variance Formula

S2p= SS1 + SS2 / df1 + df2

New cards

52

New cards

estimated standard error formula that we learned for CH10 when we have two samples and two sample means

Sm1-m2= √ S2p/n1 + S2p/n2

New cards

53

New cards

Formula for Independent measures of between subjects t test

t= m1-m2/ Sm1-m2

New cards

54

New cards

effect size => estimated Cohen's D

when the mean difference is negative, you take the absolute value ex. -7.5 becomes I 7.5 I

New cards

55

New cards

when we state with a certain degree of assurance that the actual population mean difference fall within a certain range

confidence interval

New cards

56

New cards

confidence interval percentages can be

50%, 80% or 90%

New cards

57

New cards

confidence interval formula

M1-M2= m1-m2 ± (tCI)(Sm1-m2)

New cards

58

New cards

result statement for Independent measures of between subjects t test

"Have you drank water today, didn't think so go do it, t(3)=2.50, p<.05, d=56.7, r2= 56.64%, CI=[ 2.14, 9.18]".

New cards

59

New cards

Assumptions of Independent measures or between subjects t test

independence of observations: scores independent of each other, they don't affect each other

normality: sample size of 30+

Homogeneity of variance: variance of population from which samples occur are the same ;Levine statistic; Hartley's Fmax

New cards

60

New cards

test to asses and make sure population from which samples come from have the same variance

Levine statistic

New cards

61

New cards

requires us to have equal sample sizes

Hartley's Fmax

New cards

62

New cards

Repeated Measures T Test

-we have one sample but experiment the same sample under two separate conditions -remove all individual differences thus makes it easier to pinpoint the actual cause of change -comparing different scores -ex. taking a test one day in a 60degrees room vs another day we take it in a 90degrees

New cards

63

New cards

Matched Subjects design

-we have two samples but try to make them as identical as possible -ex. matching up the kids with similar characteristics taking a test and grouping them together to make it look we have one sample but we really have two

New cards

64

New cards

difference of scores formula

X2-X1

New cards

65

New cards

mD formula

sum of difference of scores/ sample size

New cards

66

New cards

writing a hypothesis for a repeated measures or matched subjects design

null: mD= 0 alt: mD ≠ 0

New cards

67

New cards

estimated standard error with a D subscript formula

SmD= √ s2/n

New cards

68

New cards

Formula for repeated measures or matched subject design t test

t = mD/SmD

New cards

69

New cards

we use the ≤ or ≥ symbol when

we have one tailed

New cards

70

New cards

we use the = or ≠ when

we have two tailed

New cards

71

New cards

confidence interval formula for MD

MD= mD ± (tCI)(SmD)

New cards