1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is resistance to social influence?
This refers to the ability of people to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey authority.
What is social support?
The idea that an individual has assistance from other people and they are part of a supportive network
How does social support explain resistance to conformity?
Pressure to conform can be resisted if there are other people present who aren’t conforming
Breaks the unanimous position of the majority
Enables the naive participant to be free to follow their own conscience
Th dissenter acts as a ‘model’ of independent behaviour - their dissent gives rise to more dissent because the majority is no long unanimous
Evidence for social support as an explanation to resist conformity
Asch’s variations
Conformity reduced to 5% when one confederate gave a different answer
Albrecht et al. (2006) - evaluated Teen Fresh start USA, an 8 week programme to help pregnant adolescents to resist peer pressure to smoke
Social support provided by a mentor or ‘buddy’
People who had a buddy were significantly less likely to smoke than a control group without buddy
High mundane realism
How does social support explain obedience?
Pressure to obey can be rested if there are other people present who disobey
Challenges the legitimacy of authority
The dissenter’s disobedience acts as a ‘model’ of dissent for the participant to copy - frees him to act from his own conscience
Evidence for social support as an explanation to resist obedience
Milgram’s variations
obedience dropped from 65% to 10% when the participant was joined by a disobedient confederate
Gamson et al. (1982) - participants were told to produce evidence that would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign
Higher levels of resistance than Milgram - participants in groups - can discuss
29 out of 33 groups of participants (88%) rebelled against their orders
What is Locus of control?
Rotter (1966)
A person’s perception of personal control over their own behaviour
Measured on a continuum of high internal to high external
High internal - believes that their life is determined by their ow decisions and efforts
High external - believes that their life is determined by fate, luck and external factors
How does the LOC explain resistance to conformity and obedience?
High internal LOC
Base their decisions on their own beliefs rather than depending on the opinions of others - take personal responsibility of their actions
More self confident, achievement oriented and higher intelligence - greater resistance
Characteristics of a leader - much less need for social approval
Evidence for LOC as an explanation to resist conformity
Spector (1983) - used Rotter’s LOC scale on 157 students
High internal LOC were less likely to conform than those with a high external LOC, but only in situations of NSI
No difference between the 2 groups for ISI
Evidence for LOC as an explanation to resist obedience
Holland (1967) - repeated Milgram’s study and measured whether participants were internals or externals
37% of internals didn’t continue to the highest shock
Only 23% of externals didn’t continue
Internals showed greater resistance
Increases the validity of the LOC explanation and our confidence that can explain resistance