1/44
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
businesses
buy and sell econ assets
Resource markets → business → product markets
Measuring econ profit = are you actually better off/have worth
Capital budgeting decision
capital budgeting process
Develop long term goals
Screen investments
Evaluate investments
Implement project
Control life of project
Audit - how did project go/improve
econ methods take into account
Cash flow
Time value
Opp cost
econ evaluation methods
NPV
IRR
PI
^^ these show if its a good deal or bad deal
NPV
Npv of project adds value to company
Measures wealth creation of project
IRR
Percent measure of the project’s rate of return
Accept if IRR > RRR
Reject if IRR < RRR
PI
profitability index
Ratio that measures the NPV per dollar invested
Esp helpful when capital is tight
PI = PVinflows/PVoutflows
Accept if PI is greater than 1
Reject if PI is less than 1
traditional decision methods
Capital budgeting rules developed before modern financial analysis
Payback
Average accounting return
payback
Amount of time it takes for a project to pay back its investment when the project becomes profitable
Jills project payback is 4 yrs vs jacks project payback is 2 yrs
Jack is better
payback decision rule
Managers set max payback period
Payback less than max = accept
Payback greater than max = reject
If things are changing, technology, etc. → payback will usually be short
If things are stable → payback will be usually be longer
payback advantages
Simple
Focuses on getting investment back
payback disadvantages
May ignore some cash flows
Does not use time value
No recognition of risk
Not good for big projects; good for small projects
AAR
average accounting return
Rate of return after taxes and depreciation
Rate of return earned on a project
AAR = average net income/average book value
AAR decision rule
Managers determine the min acceptable AAR
If project earns more than min = accept
If project earns less than min = reject
AAR advantages
Info available
Required by regulation
Comparable
Focuses on profitability
AAR disadvantages
Does not reflect project econ value
Does not use cash flows
Does not use time value
No recognition of risk
TMI cerebral stimulator
Equals average investment
Average investment = beginning + ending/2
indep or mutually exclusive projects
For ex: buying a vehicle = mutually exclusive
Decision based on:
Rank according to desirability
Select only highest ranked alt
Let NPV guide decision (which ever one has higher one is better)
mutually exclusive
IRR and NPV may give conflicting advice
Modified and new
modified product
Modification of an existing product
Consumers already know = easy switch = big cash flow comes fast
new product
New product that would take longer to get established, but eventually be successful
New consumers = takes awhile = big cash flow comes later
capital rationing
Firms total investment budget is limited to less than that required to take on all positive NPV projects
Occurs when company has limited capital and cannot take on all wealth increasing projects
Must rank projects and choose best projects given capital constraint
soft rationing
Limits on investment
Manage growth = “growth can kill”
Existing owners want to keep control
hard rationing
funds are not available and managers must choose the “best” projects from among all available projects
project objective
Maximize NPV of total investment budget
Decision rule = select combo of projects that do not exceed capital budget
Indivisible vs divisible
econ independent projects
ones when making one choice is independent of other choices
mutually exclusive
Choosing from among alt and can only pick best one
Involves ranking process
ranking decision
managers must rank projects in order of desirability, pick best projects, stop when out of capital
rules for capital budgeting
Include only cash flows
Factor econ interdependencies
Includes all opp costs
Exclude sunk costs
Include impact of taxes
capital budgeting decision
Project cash flow = cash flow of firm
Project cash flow = OCF - capital spending - additions to NWC
terminal cash flows
Capital spending
Additions to NWC
rules for capital budgeting
Include cash flows and only cash flows in calculations
Include impact of project on cash flows from other product lines
Include all opp costs
Forget sunk costs
Include only after tax cash flows in cash flow calculation
incremental cash flows
consist of all changes in the firm’s future cash flows that are a direct consequence of adopting a project
econ interdependencies
occur when project would change the cash flows in other parts of the company; occur when project decreases the cash flows in other parts
capital budgeting projects
Revenue enhancing projects = introduce new proj or improve existing product
Cost reduction projects = focus on reducing costs
Corporate social responsibility
Regulatory requirements
incremental cash flows after taxes
periodic cash outflows and inflows that occur if investment project is accepted
operating cash flow
earnings before interest plus depreciation minus taxes
additions to net working capital
investments in projects short term assets
cost of capital
= cost of debt + cost of equity
Aka discount rate
Rate of return required by investors
capital structure
mix of debt and equity capital maintained by company
WACC
weighted average of cost of each capital component of levered firm
Average cost of common equity, preferred stock, debt
Weights are the proportion of debt and equity used by firm
Can be used as discount rate
Project should at least earn avg cost of capital used to finance the project
firm value
= value of equity and debt
V = E + D
equity cost of capital
The more risk you have = higher rate of return
cost of debt capital
There's always risk
Take tax deductibility of debt into account
biases in WACC
Great tool
Does not fit in all cases
Firm that uses one discount rate for all projects may over time increase risk of firm while decreasing its value
Managers should use market determined opp cost that reflects operating and financial risk of project
Average discount rate is OK projects match firm’s existing risks
Project specific discount rates should be used if project risks differ