tort 1 negligence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards
Negligence
The breach of a legal duty to take care by the defendant resulting in loss or damage to the claimant
2
New cards
Elements of negligence
Loss, duty of care, breach, causation, remoteness, and absence of a valid defence
3
New cards
Loss or damage
Harm of a recognised kind suffered by the claimant
4
New cards
Physical injury
Bodily harm suffered by the claimant
5
New cards
Psychiatric harm
A recognised mental illness, not mere grief or emotional distress
6
New cards
Property damage
Physical damage to land or chattels
7
New cards
Consequential economic loss
Financial loss flowing from physical injury or property damage
8
New cards
Pure economic loss
Financial loss unconnected to physical injury or property damage
9
New cards
Duty of care
A legal obligation requiring the defendant to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to the claimant
10
New cards
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
Established that manufacturers owe a duty of care to ultimate consumers
11
New cards
Neighbour principle
A person must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions likely to injure those closely and directly affected
12
New cards
Caparo Industries v Dickman (1990)
Established a three-stage test for duty of care in novel situations
13
New cards
Caparo test
Foreseeability of harm, proximity, and whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty
14
New cards
Foreseeability of harm
Harm must be objectively reasonably foreseeable
15
New cards
Proximity
A relationship of closeness between claimant and defendant
16
New cards
Fair, just and reasonable
Consideration of social, economic and policy consequences of imposing a duty
17
New cards
Floodgates argument
Concern that recognising a duty may open excessive litigation
18
New cards
Crushing liability
Liability disproportionate to the defendant’s wrongdoing
19
New cards
Incremental approach
Developing duties of care by analogy with existing cases
20
New cards
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (2018)
Confirmed duty of care develops incrementally by precedent
21
New cards
Precedent in duty of care
Existing authority establishing whether a duty exists in similar circumstances
22
New cards
Nettleship v Weston (1971)
Drivers owe a duty of care to other road users
23
New cards
Cassidy v Ministry of Health (1951)
Doctors owe a duty of care once they accept a patient
24
New cards
Baker v T E Hopkins & Sons (1959)
Duty of care extends to rescuers where rescue is foreseeable
25
New cards
Robinson v CC West Yorkshire (2018)
Police owe a duty to protect the public from foreseeable physical injury during arrests