AP gov CH 4

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/237

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 1:54 PM on 11/30/22
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

238 Terms

1
New cards
Civil liberties are
individual legal and constitutional protections against the government
2
New cards
Americansʹ civil liberties are set down in
The Bill of Rights
3
New cards
The ________ is the final interpreter of the content and scope of Americansʹ civil liberties
Supreme Court
4
New cards
Civil liberties consist of
legal and constitutional protections against the government
5
New cards
At the time of the ratification of the Constitution,
all states had bills of rights but there was no national Bill of Rights.
6
New cards
The Bill of Rights was written and proposed by
the first congress of the United States in 1789
7
New cards
The Bill of Rights was adopted primarily in response to
British abuses of the colonist's civil liberties
8
New cards
Which of the following statements about the Bill of Rights is FALSE?
Most state constitutions did not have a Bill of Rights at the time of the Constitutional
9
New cards
Convention.
10
New cards
In the case of ________, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights restrained only the
11
New cards
national government, not states and cities
Barron v. Baltimore
12
New cards
The great freedoms of speech, press, religion, and assembly are contained in the
First Amendment
13
New cards
The Supreme Court decision in Barron v. Baltimore (1833) maintained that the Bill of Rights
14
New cards
intended to preven
only the national government from abridging civil liberties.
15
New cards
Today, ________ apply to the states
all but five provisions or amendments of the Bill of Rights
16
New cards
Beginning with the case of ________ in 1925, the Supreme Court began to rule that the Bill of
17
New cards
Rights applied directly to the states, as well as to the national government.
Gitlow v. New York
18
New cards
In deciding to incorporate parts of the Bill of Rights into state laws since 1925, the Supreme
19
New cards
Court has relied on the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment
20
New cards
The ________ includes the clause ʺCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
21
New cards
religion.ʺ
First Amendment
22
New cards
The incorporation doctrine involves
application of the Bill of Rights to the states
23
New cards
Thomas Jefferson argued that the First Amendment created a ʺwall of separationʺ between
church and state.
24
New cards
Unlike Great Britain and many other nations, the United States does not have an ________
25
New cards
church that is officially supported by the government and recognized as a national institution.
established
26
New cards
Today, ________ have (has) an established church that is officially supported by the
27
New cards
government.
Great Britain
28
New cards
In Gitlow v. New York (1925), the decision that states could not abridge the freedoms of
29
New cards
expression protected by the First Amendment was based on the
fourteenth amendment
30
New cards
The significance of Gitlow v. New York (1925) was that
a provision of the Bill of Rights was applied to the states for the first time.
31
New cards
Aid to parochial schools was first passed in the 1960s at the request of
Lyndon Johnson.
32
New cards
In Lemon v. Kurtzman, the Supreme Court established that aid to church-related schools must
33
New cards
do all of the following EXCEPT
inhibit religion
34
New cards
The abridgment of citizensʹ freedom to worship, or not to worship, as they please is prohibited
35
New cards
by the
free exercise clause
36
New cards
In dealing with First Amendment cases involving religion, the Supreme Court has ruled that
while all religious beliefs are constitutionally protected, all religious practices are not
37
New cards
In the Lemon v. Kurtzman decision of 1971, the Supreme Court ruled that
aid to church-related schools must be for secular purposes only, and cannot be used to
38
New cards
advance or inhibit religion.
39
New cards
In the Engel v. Vitale case of 1962, the Supreme Court ruled that ________ was (were)
40
New cards
unconstitutional.
prayers done as classroom exercises in public schools
41
New cards
The Supreme Court has interpreted the establishment clause of the First Amendment as
prohibiting school-organized Bible-reading and prayer in public schools
42
New cards
Which of the following statements about religion and politics is FALSE?
43
New cards
A) Many school districts have simply ignored the Supreme Courtʹs ban on school prayer
44
New cards
and hold prayers in their classrooms.
45
New cards
B) The religious diversity in America has made it difficult to establish one state religion
46
New cards
such as Britain has.
47
New cards
C) The Supreme Court has never permitted the claim of religious freedom to permit every
48
New cards
sort of behavior.
49
New cards
D) Efforts are underway to amend the Constitution to permit school prayer.
50
New cards
E) In recent years, religious issues and controversies have become less visible in political
51
New cards
debate.
In recent years, religious issues and controversies have become less visible in political
52
New cards
debate.
53
New cards
In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court ruled that
aid to church-related schools must have a secular legislative purpose
54
New cards
The Supreme Court has ruled that government aid to church-related schools
is permitted when the aid is for a non-religious purpose.
55
New cards
Government aid to religious schools has been a major issue
since the mid 1960s.
56
New cards
Which of the following is NOT a free exercise issue?
teacher led prayers in public schools
57
New cards
In 2005, the Supreme Court found that two Kentucky counties violated the establishment
58
New cards
clause of the First Amendment by
banning ʺintelligent designʺ from the curriculum
59
New cards
During the 1980s, the Supreme Court ________ the displaying of Christmas nativity scenes and
60
New cards
Hanukkah menorahs on public property.
upheld the constitutionality of
61
New cards
In free exercise cases, the Supreme Court
allows the government to interfere with religious practices as long as it is not specifically
62
New cards
aimed at religion
63
New cards
In regard to the free exercise clause, the Supreme Court has made each of the following rulings
64
New cards
EXCEPT
65
New cards
A) polygamy may be justified for Mormons on religious grounds.
66
New cards
B) the Air Force can enforce its dress code even against religiously based dress choices.
67
New cards
C) Amish parents may take their children out of school after the eighth grade.
68
New cards
D) people could become conscientious objectors to war on religious grounds.
69
New cards
E) public schools cannot require Jehovahʹs Witnesses to attend flag saluting ceremonies.
polygamy may be justified for Mormons on religious grounds.
70
New cards
The Supreme Court ruled that freedom of religious practice was more important than the right
71
New cards
of the government to interfere in deciding in favor of
the right of Amish parents in Wisconsin to take their children out of public school after
72
New cards
the eighth grade.
73
New cards
Freedom of expression
has sometimes been limited when it conflicts with other rights and values.
74
New cards
Which of the following statements about freedom of expression is FALSE?
Government can limit expression more easily than it can limit action
75
New cards
________ refers to a governmentʹs censorship of material before it is published
Prior restraint
76
New cards
In what case did the Supreme Court rule that a newspaper, no matter how outrageous its
77
New cards
opinions, must be allowed to publish without prior restraint?
Near v. Minnesota
78
New cards
The extent of an individualʹs or groupʹs freedom from prior restraint depends on
who the individual or group is.
79
New cards
In its Near v. Minnesota decision of 1931, the Supreme Court ruled that
the state government could not use prior restraint to shut down an outspoken
80
New cards
newspaper.
81
New cards
The Supreme Court has permitted prior restraint of which of the following?
high school newspapers
82
New cards
The Pentagon Papers dealt with
a documented history of United States involvement in the Vietnam War which the
83
New cards
government wanted kept secret
84
New cards
Which of the following elements of the Bill of Rights was extended to the states by the
85
New cards
Supreme Court case of Near v. Minnesota?
freedom of the press
86
New cards
Time and time again, the Supreme Court has protected freedom of the press by
striking down prior restraint.
87
New cards
The case of Near v. Minnesota (1931)
held that government had illegally issued a prior restraint.
88
New cards
Prior restraint is most often considered acceptable on the grounds of
national security
89
New cards
In the case of Dennis v. United States, the Supreme Court
upheld the convictions of Communist party officials who had been sent to prison
90
New cards
because of their beliefs.
91
New cards
In the case of New York Times v. United States in 1971, the Supreme Court ruled
against prior restraint in the case of the Pentagon Papers, which allowed them to be
92
New cards
published.
93
New cards
In Schenck v. United States (1919), Justice Holmes said that speech can be restricted when it
provokes ʺa clear and present dangerʺ to people
94
New cards
Constitutional protections of free speech are ________ on private property
diminished
95
New cards
A shield law
gives reporters the right to withhold information from the courts.
96
New cards
The Supreme Court ruled in Branzburg v. Hayes (1972) that in the absence of shield laws
the right of a free trial preempts the reporterʹs right to protect sources.
97
New cards
In Roth v. United States, the Supreme Court held that
obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected free speech.
98
New cards
The principle that ʺobscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or
99
New cards
pressʺ was established in
Roth v. United States.
100
New cards
Obscenity is
not protected under the Constitution.

Explore top flashcards

Onc lec 3
Updated 435d ago
flashcards Flashcards (112)
SAT Vocab Lesson 7-8
Updated 321d ago
flashcards Flashcards (30)
Uni
Updated 450d ago
flashcards Flashcards (42)
POS lesson 15
Updated 1074d ago
flashcards Flashcards (29)
Festival Neck Pain
Updated 1099d ago
flashcards Flashcards (81)
Unit 5: Hereditary
Updated 1044d ago
flashcards Flashcards (62)
Onc lec 3
Updated 435d ago
flashcards Flashcards (112)
SAT Vocab Lesson 7-8
Updated 321d ago
flashcards Flashcards (30)
Uni
Updated 450d ago
flashcards Flashcards (42)
POS lesson 15
Updated 1074d ago
flashcards Flashcards (29)
Festival Neck Pain
Updated 1099d ago
flashcards Flashcards (81)
Unit 5: Hereditary
Updated 1044d ago
flashcards Flashcards (62)