1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
define for price discrimination
price discrimination means charging higher prices to different consumer groups for the same product
why do firms use price discrimination and how do they benefit (typically what firms do this?)
firms maximise profits and revenue by hijacking consumer surplus and converting it into producer surplus
typically firms offering services price discriminate
what is consumer surplus
the difference between what consumers were willing to pay and the actual price they pay
how do firms hijack consumer surplus
by offering varying price points, firms can extract more value from a wider range of consumers therefore maximise their revenue
explain the types of price discrimination
first degree- all consumers are charged the highest price they are willing to pay
second degree- charging different prices based on quantity purchased
third degree- charging different prices to certain consumer groups or for different time periods
first degree price discrimination examples
all consumers are charged the maximum price they are willing to pay.
for example at an auction
2nd degree price discrimination example
consumers charged different prices based on quantity purchased
eg- bulk buying,
third degree price discrimination
charging different prices to different consumer groups based on different elasticities of demand
eg- student discounts, old age pensioners, child vs adult
conditions required for price discrimination
firms must have monopoly power/ firms are price makers
the must be no seepage/ reselling - consumers charged lower prices can’t resell to those charged higher prices
different groups must have different price elasticities of demand- consumers with less elastic demand charged higher prices than consumers with elastic demand
advantages of price discrimination
price discrimination allows firms to provide a service or good to consumers that would not otherwise be able to consume the good
price discrimination increases producer surplus as it allows firms to charge higher prices to consumers willing to pay higher prices
more producer surplus increases revenue
higher output of firms leads to more efficient allocation of resources because distribution of goods and services align with what consumers are willing to pay
reduce overcrowding and helps spread out demand ie: students pay less for cinema tickets on a Monday
disadvantages of price discrimination
consumers are exploited
unfair for certain groups groups with inelastic demand are charged much higher prices which can lead to increased income inquality
not allocative efficient as price is greater than MC
disproportionately effects those with less bargaining power
market segmentation issues- if firms incorrectly segment the market than it could lead to a reduction in sales and market share
solutions to price discrimination
government intervention
governments can implement laws to prevent price gauging (significantly raising prices to unfair levels)
encouraging higher levels of competition
why is price discrimination effected in contestable markets
the threat of new entrants reduces firms monopoly power. this is because is firms rise prices to high than rival firms can undercut these prices and quickly gain market share.
eg- firms can target overpriced consumers like families during school holidays and charge lower prices compared to monopoly firms.
when does profit max occur
MC=MR
what is a contestable market
firms face a high threat of potential competition from new firms entering the market
what is important for contestable markets
there is freedom to entry and exit (ie; there are no barriers to entry)
there are also no sunk costs in contestable markets
what are sunk costs
sunk costs are costs that can’t be recovered if a new firm leaves the market
give an example of a sunk cost
advertising costs
salaries already paid
rent or property costs
employee training costs
research costs
what are firms already existing in the market called
incumbent
conditions for contestable markets
incumbent firms must have no competitive advantage over new entrants
all firms must have equal access to technology
there must be no brand loyalty
firms and consumers must posses perfect information
diagram of a contestable market

hit and run competition exists in contestable markets
this means firms enter a market temporarily and then leave once abnormal profits have been exhausted
what happens to prices in contestable markets
non-contestable markets allow firms to maximise profits (MC=MR), in contestable firms the threat of competition forces firms to lower their prices to the point where AC=AR so they can only achieve normal profits
benefits of contestable markets
lower prices for consumers
better customer service
firms have incentives to reduce costs and satisfy consumer preferences which brings the market closer to productive and allocative efficiency.
where does productive efficiency occur
productive efficiency occurs when AC is minimised, AC=MC
how can markets become more contestable
governments can intervene to reduce monopoly power
privatisation and deregulation make markets more contestable by allowing more competition and making it easier for new entrants to enter the market
an example of a barrier that restricts contestability in a market
for example the national grid is a natural monopoly so new entrants who wish to sell electricity domestically may not get equal access to the grid. this is because large vertically integrated companies have information and cost advantages.
the energy crisis of 2021/22. led to many small firms failing and in turn market concentration increased and monopoly firms gained more market share.
what are the 4 market structures
monopoly
oligopoly
monopolistic competition
perfect competition
features of monopolies
price makers - possess pricing power
monopoly power - there can raise prices and reduce output (profit max) or they can increase output and lower price (sales max)
highly concentrated - market dominated by one firm that has a high market share
technical monopoly - 25% market share
pure monopoly 1 firms dominates entire market
no/ little competition
high barriers to entry
causes of monopoly power
geographical monopoly ie- one local shop supplies rural area
public sector monopolies formed for essential goods and services
legal barriers like patents
factors that increase monopoly power
barriers to entry- eg- large economies of scale, high r&d costs
mergers and acquisitions - firms can combine with other firms which would increase market share
advertisement- large firms can promote their brand and build strong brand loyalty
limit pricing- monopolies can set prices low enough to deter new entrants
product differentiation- firms can make their product unique from others- gain brand loyalty
give examples of natural barriers to entry
high research and development costs
high start up costs
economies of scale
high sunk costs
what are some strategic barriers to entry
patents and copyrights
product differentiation
brand loyalty
limit pricing
predatory pricing
perfect competition is..
the most competitive market. it is a market where a large number of small firms operate in strong competition
features of perfect competition
lots of small firms
least concentrated firms each posses little market share
no brand loyalty
no barriers to entry
firms sell homogenous products
consumers and firms possess perfect information - ie- they know exactly what quality and prices to expect.
each firm is a price taker
no pricing power firms accept ruling market price determined by supply and demand
compare the demand curve for perfect competition and other markets demand curve
perfect competition is the only market structure with no pricing power and a perfectly elastic price
monopolies, oligopolies, monopolistic competition have a downwards sloping demand curve and posses monopoly power
discuss efficiency with regard to perfectly competitive market structures
perfect competition is the most efficient market due to strong competition— firms achieve productive efficiency because they minimise average costs in order to survive. they also achieve allocative efficiency because firms produce optimal amount to satisfy consumer preferences.
what is market concentration
measures how one or more firms dominate the market in terms of sales
what is the most concentrated structure and describe imperfect competition
a monopoly. market concentration is much higher in imperfect competition. firms are less efficient because they are not perfectly competitive.
firms in imperfect competition engage in price competition, what is price competition
price competition is when firms lower prices to take market share from rivals
firms also engage in non-price competition to build customer loyalty what is non-price competition
improved quality and customer service
loyalty cards
reward programs
successful advertising campaigns
better locations
better opening times
warranties