1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
2 ways firms can grow in size
internal growth
via integration
what is internal growth
firms increasing their output
e.g. through increased investment or an increased labour force
how is internal growth achieved
achieved by re-investing profits
what is integration
occurs when 2 firms join together to form one new company
can be voluntary (merger) or forced (takeover)
4 types of integration
vertical integration
horizontal integration
conglomerate integration
lateral integration
vertical forward integration explanation
firm buys another firm closer to the market
e.g. primary buying secondary or secondary buying tertiary
vertical backwards integration explanation
firm buys another firm closer to the source
e.g. secondary buying primary
horizontal integration
2 firms in the same industry and the same stage of production
conglomerate integration explanation
two firms in unrelated industries
e.g. virgin gyms and virgin media
lateral merger explanation
2 firms merge which produce different but complementary products
motives for integration
more profit
less competition (horizontal integration) - could also keep the brand instead of changing it so you don’t have to compete but do get their profits (remove a threat from the market)
higher market monopoly / increase market share
backward integration could help regulate or reduce your costs of production
more control over supply chain
gain monopoly power
to exploit further economies of scale
horizontal integration - their systems may be more efficient than yours
what are the different sectors
primary sector - closest to source e.g. farming, fishing
secondary sector - e.g. construction, manufacturing
tertiary sector - closest to market e.g. retail, banking, finished products
advantages of a horizontal merger
already knows the industry
have control over the competition
could increase your profits and exploit economies of scale (financial, purchasing)
rapidly increase market share
rationalisation
disadvantages of a horizontal merger
if output increases too much, could suffer diseconomies of scale
may suffer congestion costs
gov could step in and block it if its seen as anti competitive
advantages of a backwards vertical merger
can lower you raw material costs if you also own the suppliers
more price competitive as you can lower your prices if materials are cheaper
control over supply chain (could stop supplying to rivals)
lower price as no markup
disadvantages of a backward vertical merger
lack of experience in other market
may suffer congestion costs (to help with the merger, different systems etc)
managers not skilled in that industry
advantages of a forward vertical merger
more price competitive
access to customer and always have someone to sell the good you’ve made
guaranteed outlet for product
can exploit financial economies of scale
disadvantages of a forward vertical merger
lack of experience in other market
congestion sots
lack of skill in that new ‘sector’
advantages of a conglomerate merger
get to sell to a new demographic of customers which could increase your profits / revenue
risk bearing economies of scale
disadvantages of a conglomerate merger
don’t have experience in those other markets
congestion costs
lack of market knowledge
new competitors and high costs getting used to the market / researching it
high risk of price war
advantages of a lateral merger
customers are likely to buy some products together which can therefore increase profits
brand recognition
can exploit marketing and managerial economies of scale
disadvantages of a lateral merger
lack of experience in other markets
congestion costs
same market area - if there’s a recession and people buy less hotel rooms, your other business also struggles, don’t spread your risk
may not be able to exploit purchasing economies of scale
congestion cost definition
external costs / negative externalities