1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
CR lateral sacrum
perpendicular to level of ASIS and to a point 3.5in posterior
How should the coccygeal segment be seen in an AP coccyx projection
not superimpose by pubic bones
what demonstrates no rotation for the lateral sacrum and coccyx
closely superimposed posterior margins of ischia and ilia
CR for PA coccyx (prone)
10 degrees cephalad enters MSP coccyx
how can you tell that there’s no rotation in the AP coccyx projection
demonstrated by distal segment in line with pubic symphysis
what helps reduce scatter radiation for the lateral projection of the coccyx and sacrum
lead rubber behind pt
open or close collimation should be used for lateral sacrum and coccyx
closed to improve visibility
for the sacrum and coccyx projection should a low kvp or high kvp be used
low kvp
how should the sacrum be demonstrated in a AP axial projection
free of foreshortening with sacral curvature straightened
CR AP axial sacrum (supine)
15 degrees cephalad enters MSP at 2in superior to pubic symphysis
CR for PA axial sacrum (prone)
15 degrees caudad enters MSP at level of sacral curve
CR for lateral coccyx
perpendicular to 3.5in posterior and 2in inferior to ASIS
how should the pubic bones be demonstrated in a AP axial sacrum projection
not overlapping sacrum
why are the AP axial of sacrum and coccyx preferred over PA axial
sacrum and coccyx are closer to the IR
why is an angled CR used instead of a perpendicular CR used for the AP axial sacrum
sacrum will appear foreshorten with perpendicular CR
CR for AP coccyx (supine)
10 degrees caudad enters MSP 2in superior to pubic symphysis
why is low kvp used for AP axial sacrum and coccyx
to improve contrast and reduce scatter
how can you tell there’s no rotation in an AP axial sacrum projection
demonstrated by symmetric alae