1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Key autobiographical context
- born in 1896 Minnesota
- 1917 joined army
- fell in love with zelda when in the army, but she delayed their marriage until he was successful
- married Zelda Sayre -1920
- Fitzgerald known for his love for his wife, alcoholism + extravagant lifestyle
- fell into reckless life of parties + hedonism
- desperate to please Zelda by writing to earn more money – became alcoholic
- their relationship became turbulent
- Zelda had an affair, his romantic dreams were crushed, but they continued to be together
- their traumatic marriage and her breakdowns became the leading influence in his writing
- 1925 published TGG
Life influences on TGG
Lot of TGG is autobiographical
Like fitz:
nick is born in Minnesota, attended an ivy league uni + moved to NY after war
Gatsby idealised wealth, love + luxury
Falls in love + marries a woman out of his social class
When Zelda gave birth to their daughter, she said “I hope it’s beautiful and a fool - a beautiful little fool”
Fitz tries hard to prove his social standing + secure his love
BUT, Gatsby (unlike fitz) does not indulge in alcoholism or get involved in his parties
Like gatsby, Fitz suffered a lot of sadness in his endless pursuit of happiness
Maybe Fitz saw himself in Gatsby
Killed Gatsby off – maybe his prophetic foresight that his marriage would suffer an irreparable break
Killing off gatsby + keeping wealthy Buchanans alive – maybe fitz reveals partialness to the upper class
Fitz felt he didn’t deserve Zelda + that he wasn’t enough for her
Fitz is both nick + gatsby simultaneously
like nick lives “within and without” the story
WWI and the Jazz Age
20s a time of growth + prosperity with a lot of cynicism and corruption
The war was the first of its kind, so shook a lot of people -’The Great War’
only 60 years after the American Civil War
so, America was still finding its identity
This gave birth to the jazz age
Glamorous decade of culture + art
BUT this dissolved in Wall Street Crash 1929
was said to have epitomized the jazz age, but he denied as “a generation grown up to find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faiths in man shaken”
Gatsby + Nick both served in WWI
Extravagance of his parties reflected lavish + golden decade
BUT even with all its decadence there was still divide
⤷ old money ruled
⤷ new money tried to climb social ladder
⤷ no money excluded
Ultimately ‘no money’ bear the brunt of ruthlessness of the ‘old money’
⤷ myrtle is killed
⤷ George kills gatsby (originally part of ‘no money’ before killing himself)
The Lost Generation
Referred to by Gertrude Stein American writer
Lost gen of post WWI
one of the burning things of most American literature is the idea of the great American novel
Americans felt that because it was a new nation and continent, it lacked the culture that areas like Europe afforded
Fitzgerald and many others of his time came to Europe a lot and found roots in it due to Europe’s long classical, literary and historic tradition and culture
This gen felt powerless + saw life as pointless after the war
Feelings of loss + emptiness filled with alcohol + indulgence
Fitzgerald: this generation found “all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faiths in man shaken”
We can see this in TGG where Gatsby stands out from faithless society of east + west eggs for his “extraordinary gift for hope”
Flappers and Freedom
Many of fitz’s short stories gave insights on youthful hedonism + antics of liberated young women, ‘flappers’
Subverted social + gender norms
⤷ short skirts, short hair, makeup
19th Amendment 1920 gave women right to vote
They cut their hair in bobs + gave up corsets to reinvent themselves
Jordan Baker - her name shows this bc they are both makes of cars, suggesting lack of femininity
⤷ as a professional golfer subverts all trad gender norms
⤷ unmarried + childless
⤷ she is a foil + contrast to Daisy
Both myrtle + jordan show that emancipation is the common desire for women in 1920s america
The American Dream
US advertised as ‘land of opportunity’
A place for success regardless of social background if you worked hard enough
A lot of people who migrated to US were escaping something
Idea of american dream took place after the Great depression, but many like fitz still challenged this idea + questioned its possibility
Believed that it boiled down to the pursuit of wealth
Ironically wrote about widespread materialism, even though he was indulgent
Gatsby personifies the American dream, and how it inspires american society
He doesn't achieve it as daisy is a proxy for wealth + the american dream
Myrtle also fails
⤷ she clings to it, and it kills her
⤷ gatsby’s car symbol of american dream as it’s associated with restlessness + power
Media and Mass Market
TGG written against a backdrop of exponential growth in commodities available for purchase + advertising
Eyes of Doctor T.J Eckleburg are a major symbol of advertising
⤷ symbol of the power of advertising in 1920s America, as a means for capitalism + consumerism that fuels the class division and American dream
⤷ it becomes a religion too
⤷ Wilson says “god sees everything” whilst “looking at the eyes of Doctor T.J Eckleburg” (chapter 8)
⤷ if god is advertising, then maybe capitalism is a religion for Gatsby + friends
Jay Gatsby rebrands himself from Gatz to Gatsby, marketing himself through parties in hopes of winning daisy
Structure
Satirical? who is the Great Gatsby? is Gatsby ‘Great’?
So in 1925, Fitzgerald is writing a novel questioning the values of modern American society
post war — looking for a future where America is the no.1 society (US was an international power after WW1)
Unreliable narrator — Nick contradicts himself from beginning to the end of the novel
it is a novel about contradictions of a society
he not unreliable because he lies, but because he himself is not sure of what he is seeing and the motivations
“I just remembered that today’s my birthday”
Bildungsroman — coming of age
marks a new era that transforms lives
a new outlook
age 30 yet still lonely
“There was an autumn flavour in the air”
summer to autumn, bildungsroman. End of long summer, and life starts again
Themes — the lost ideal
lost paradise
lost intangible beauty of the world
the lost love that Daisy represents in the novel
lost wealth and lost American dream
Social class and identity
If you are from a family who has had money for generations, you are old money
Gatsby aspires to be a part of that aristocratic crowd
Gatsby has a lot of money. But where did he get it from? Is it clean money? Is any money clean money?
Ambition and Aspiration
yes, it’s a novel about loss and love, but also about ambition and aspiration
Characters — Nick
how he is impersonal?
his relationships?
“for a moment I thought I loved her. But I am slow-thinking and full of interior rules that act as brakes in my desires”
“I see I have given the impression that the events…were all that absorbed me. On the contrary, they were merely casual events in a crowded summer, and, until much later, they absorbed me infinitely less than my personal affairs”
-at the time, these events were less remarkable for him, he is just showing how he is conscious of his job as storyteller of selection and omission.
-doesn't want to come across as someone obsessed with Gatsby from the very start – but it can be interpreted and seen that he seemed to be towards the end
-he could be hiding secrets – what personal affairs? Jordan?
-adds on to this idea of surface vs reality – the book constantly gives us peoples surfaces, but not their insides and how they really feel
“Everyone suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that I have ever known”
-Nick believes this as he is surrounded by people who are deceitful and dishonest
-he recognises that people are only showing a character of themselves
-whether he is actually an honest narrator or not is up to reader interpretation – as a narrator, calling yourself honest may not be entirely convincing as he is constantly contradicting himself
Motifs — light
“Gatsby’s house, lit from tower to cellar”
“Your place looks like the World’s Fair”
AO5 CRITICISMS — nuggets
Gatsby and his idealistic conceptions of Daisy and obsession
with the past – naïve and innocent or stupid and irrational?
“In worshipping the grail… Gatsby is really worshipping himself in the mirror of Daisy’s symbolism” – Giles Mitchell
“Gatsby has vitality and potential for intense happiness” – John Chambers
“Academia and film have romanticized Gatsby as a hero and his rotten core ignored because of Nick’s overblown narration” – Monty J Heying
Daisy as the object of Gatsby’s desire – objectified or selfish and weak? Is she sincere or fake?
“She becomes the unwitting grail in Gatsby’s adolescent quest” – Leland S. Person
“the book contains no important woman character” – Fitzgerald in a letter to his publisher
“She is a gesture that is committed to nothing more real than her own image on the silver screen” – Marius Bewley, 1963
“even Nick admits that Daisy ‘tumbled short of his dreams — not through her own fault, but because of the colossal vitality of his illusion.”
“We’re not Daisy apologists, but we’re also not sure she deserves every bit of her bad reputation… Anybody would crack under the pressure of being somebody else’s light at the end of the green
dock.” – SparkLife notes editor, May 2013
“She feels like she’s living in a movie of her own life. She’s constantly on show, performing all the time. Nothing bad can happen in a dream. You can’t die in a dream. She’s in her own TV show. She’s like a Kardashian.” – Carey Mulligan, Vogue, April 2013
“she is for sale” Matthew Bruccoli writes in a 1922 preface to the novel, “but he doesn’t have the right currency”
Myrtle Wilson as a symbol of the lower class, trying to escape
her situation through Tom – sympathy or dislike?
“Myrtle Wilson is presented as being badly spoken, lacking in taste, self-seeking” – Tony Cavender
Is the book a good one? Is it a detached and superficial story
with awful characters, or does it represent real 20 th century life…
“None of its characters are likable. None of them are even dislikeable, though nearly all of them are despicable” – Kathryn Schulz
“The Great Gatsby is less involved in human emotion than any of book of comparable fame” – Kathryn Schulz
“For all of us, life is about constantly have to will ourselves to eternal optimism in the face of elusive dreams or challenging goals” – Halle Edwards
Jordan – seemingly indifferent and cold, having to balance
multiple identities
“To Nick, Jordan appears hard and self-sufficient. However, as with Daisy, this appearance can be seen as self-protection” – Tony Cavender
“Jordan is, literally and metaphorically, a woman successfully playing a man’s game” – Froehlich and Hazleton
AO5 — Psychoanalytical approach
gatsby seems like a larger-than-life romantic hero, different from other characters in the novel
BUT, the readers interest created by the romance of G + D lies not in the uniqueness, but the ways it mirrors all the less appealing relationships (between T+D, T+M, M+G, and N+J)
a pattern is revealed of the characters’ fears of intimacy, the unconscious conviction that emotional ties to another human will result in being emotionally devastated
this psychological issue is so pervasive in the story that Gatsby’s love story becomes a drama of dysfunctional love
AO5 — marxist criticism
The Great Gatsby can be seen as a chronicle of the American dream when capitalism’s promise of economic opportunity for all seemed at its peak of fulfilment in this nation
Gatsby himself with his mansion seems to embody the infinite possibility offered by the American dream
but the novel is not a celebration of capitalist culture, but reveals its dark underbelly
through unflattering characterisation of those at the top of the economic heap, and its examination in how the American dream not only fails to fulfil its promise but contributes to decay of personal values, Fitz’s novel critiques American capitalist culture
the sense of self-worth fostered in us derives from external standards and trends
we can never be secure in what we already have because something new and better is always being sold
so even Tom is maybe somewhat insecure about his social standing, so flexes constantly
and this is why Gatsby’s love for Daisy was always unattainable, because if he did have her fully, he would constantly want more - she is not enough to fulfil this ideal he has of her and his desire for wealth and social value
people like the wilsons do not stand a chance in a world dominated by people like the Buchanans
valley of ashes — is a chilling image of the lives of those who do not have socioeconomic resources like the Buchanans
ashes are what’s left over after something is used or wasted
a literal dumping ground
it is from settings like this that the American dream i supposed to emerge — that a shaky but persistent business enterprise is supposed to lead to financial security
but, the language used clearly imply that this is a land of hopelessness, not a place where dreams are likely to be fulfilled — a “greay land” that is “impenetrable”
the only way to escape this hell on earth is for people like Toom to exploit you
the american dream through Gatsby is corrupt as he achieves his wealth through criminal activities, and is unattainable and impossible to achieve as Gatsby does not achieve his true dreams and dies for it
Gatsby does not use his home, his pool, only his bedroom that is the only place truly decorated
he does this because the sole function of his material possessions is the sign-exchange value
he wants the image of ownership
his library etc, is all surface with no depth or truth to it — an illusion, as is the American Dream
Gatsby really wants to possess Daisy, which is a permanent sign that he belongs to her socioeconomic class — she is like the empty things in his house, all surface level, loves the image of her, not her depth
Nick is seduced by the American Dream Gatsby represents, so his narrative romanticises Gatsby
from a marxist perspective - TTG’s most obvious flaw is the unsympathetic portrayal of George and Myrtle
they try to improve their lives in the only way they know how
they are victims of capitalism because ethe only way they can succeed in capitalist economy is to succeed in a market (myrtle - being purchased by Tom, and George - allows himself to be ridiculed and mistreated by Tom)
both are unable to succeed in a market, so are forever condemned to the valley of ashes
they are also negative stereotypes of a lower class couple — George is not very loud or bright, and she is loud, obnoxious and overly sexual
we feel sorry for George, but not because he is a victim to a repressive system, but because he does not have what it takes and has personal failings, not enough to keep his wife or achieve social mobility
the focus on the flaws in their personalities take away the blame on the system, instead blaming the man, making us feel pity for him rather than true sympathy
meanwhile, Myrtle is reduced to a horrible and immoral, sexual mistress and disloyal, selfish wife, taking away the focus of the fact that she is doing what she can to achieve her dreams of a better life
AO5 — feminist criticisms
“nowadays people begin by sneering at family life and family institutions and next they’ll throw everything overboard “
Tom’s double standard for his own and his wife’s behaviour
shows that he assumes that the moral structure of society rests on the stability of the patriarchal family and that the stability of the patriarchal family rests on the conformity of women to patriarchal gender roles
the period of the Jazz Age was one of enormous social change, especially in the area of women’s rights
1920 - they were finally given the right to vote
skirts became shorter, laced corsets disappeared, bobbed hair became fashion for young women
women also seen smoking and drinking often in company of men, without chaperones
attitude of free self-expression, sexuality and unrestrained enjoyment
‘the New Woman’
women seen as the standard-bearers of traditional values
so with this change, many critics saw a decline of moral value
even fitzgerald saw himself married to a New Woman, so may have been subject to the ideology that characterised his age
it was his experience of life in the ‘fast lane’ that created some misgivings about the changes in 1920s america
he was able to accept the New Woman only as long as he could view her as psychologically troubled and in need of his help
the women in gatsby’s parties, however, have no differences and are lookalike
all the women in TGG are not really seen as individual, they are presented through Nick’s eyes as basically the same, portrayed in a generally negative light
the only ones with true individuality are Jordan, Daisy and Myrtle — and these women are not very empowering
Daisy’s femininity is seen as dangerously alluring and causing the fall of men
while, Jordan has to emasculate herself to not be at the mercy of men, yet she is kind of thrown aside and mistreated by Nick
the novel is uncomfortable with the New Woman
despite the differences in class, marital status, occupation, appearance and personality of Myrtle, Daisy and Jordan, all are versions of the New Woman
all display some sort of modern independence
TOM AND DAISY
What their relationship represents
Materialism and hierarchical obsession of the post-war era
Jazz-era’s upper class capitalist politics
Together due to status and wealth – practical and stable in regards to social expectations
Infidelity, abuse, lack of respect, yet unified and unbreakable – perhaps because there is nothing delicate or emotional to break, one cannot break cement or money
Lack of love yet an unbreakable class bond
The way they choose to live their lives, their morality (or lack thereof), and how much they dream doesn’t seem to matter. This, of course, is tragic and antithetical to the idea of the
American Dream, which claims that class should be irrelevant and anyone can rise to the top.
Psychoanalytical criticism
fear of emotional intimacy with both Daisy and Myrtle, so his divided time and interest protects him from true intimacy with either
Daisy marries Tom not for love, but to keep herself from loving Gatsby who she had gotten too attached to for her own comfort
after marriage, she seems ot be head over heels for him, which people might read as her desire for emotional intimacy with Tom
but, she is probably very aware and concerned about Tom’s regular infidelity and that whenever he is not with her he is with another woman
instead of hating him for such mistreatment, he falls in love with him, which can be explained psychologically:
a woman who falls in love with a man suffering from fear of intimacy probably fears intimacy herself - and if she fears it then a man who has no desire for it can make her feel safe
learning that Tom’s interest didn’t focus only on her, she could be capable of loving him intensely because he did not threaten her protective shell
but, gatsby’s focus and interests is solely on her, so he poses a threat to her fear and protection from emotional true intimacy that Gatsby wants from her
Marxist criticism
for tom, everything is a commodity — including his marriage to Daisy being an exchange of her beauty + youth + social standing for his power + money + image of strength/stability
Myrtle and George
What their relationship represents
Lower-class of 1920s society – lack of hope
Valley of the ashes symbolism
George is subservient and faithful to his dismissive and selfish wife
Instability of their marriage comes from the instability of their financial situation – unable to leave one another and are exploited by members of the wealthier classes
Fitzgerald seems to be arguing that anyone who is not wealthy is much more vulnerable to tragedy and strife – contrasting marriages of the Buchanans and the Wilsons help illustrate the novel’s critique of the wealthy, old-money class
Psychoanalytical criticism
she is not emotionally invested in him or anyone really, only married him because she mistakenly believed he was of a higher class than he was
his emotional dependence on her (like his belief that Dr T.J Eckleburg are the eyes of God) suggest psychological disorientation rather than emotional intimacy
insecurity and obsession to please her, mistaken for love? because they were never close
spent his life just working continuously tired and sickened because of it. so he mistakes this for love and is emotionally dependent on her as a result
are George and Gatsby similar? both trying to please the women they ‘love’ due to insecurity about social status, and both tragically die as result
Daisy and Gatsby
What their relationship represents
While Daisy views Gatsby as a memory, Daisy is Gatsby’s past, present and future – he is obsessed over his idealised conceptions of their past relationship
Gatsby objectifies Daisy as the object of some egotistical pursuit – he pursues an idea, not a real person
Gatsby pursues Daisy to complete his platonic conception of himself?
Gatsby’s love is naïve and insane, but somehow hopeful and charming
Daisy can never live up to Gatsby’s immense projection of her or fulfil his rose-tinted memory of her
Gatsby’s pursuit of Daisy can be compared to the American Dream – the dream is as alluring as Daisy but as ultimately elusive and unobtainable, even deadly
Daisy, of course, is only human – flawed, flighty, and ultimately unable to embody the huge fantasy Gatsby projects onto her. So this, in turn, means that the American Dream itself is just a fantasy, a concept too flimsy to actually hold weight, especially in the fast-paced, dog-eat-dog world of 1920s America.
Daisy letting Gatsby take the blame for Myrtle’s murder without second thought indicates her conception of him as an emotional buffer between her and the world, and as useless as a lover due to his social origin - he is expendable
meanwhile, Gatsby is not emotionally in love with Daisy, but he is devoted to he because she is the key to his goal rather than the goal itself
he had set his sights on the attainment of wealth long before he met Daisy
his boyhood schedule of Jimmy Gatz shows this where he devotes his days to self-improvement
his reinvention of his past is more than just a ploy to pass off as a member of the upper class, but is also a form of denial, a psychological defence to help him repress the memory of his real past
daisy for him is not a flesh and blood woman, but an emblem of the emotional insulation he unconsciously desires from himself, James Gatz that his past belongs to
Tom and Myrtle
What their relationship represents
Tom is Myrtle’s escape from her lower-class lifestyle – she is so obsessed with gaining a better status that she does not realise Tom is merely using her
Highlights how lower class is exploited by the middle class
Reminder that class is an enormous, insurmountable barrier, and when people try to circumvent the barrier by dating across classes, they end up endangering themselves
Tom and Myrtle’s relationship allows Fitzgerald to sharply critique the world of the wealthy, old-money class in 1920s New York. By showing Tom’s affair with a working-class woman, Nick reveals Tom’s ugliest behaviour as well as the cruelty of class divisions during the roaring twenties.
Psychoanalytical criticism
their relationship lacks intimacy
no desire to be close to his mistress - she is only a way to avoid being close to his wife
his treatment of her shows no deep emotional investment
calls for her when it suits him
lies about Daisy’s religious opposition to divorce to keep her away from becoming demanding, and breaks her nose when she becomes so anyway
him crying when she dies is only a moment of sentimental self-indulgence, not love
Myrtle also lacks real concern for him
he is only a ticket out of George’s garage
her motive is economic desperation rather than fear of intimacy
Marxist criticism
tom uses his money and social status to purchase Myrtle and the numerous other WC women he has affairs with
like the chambermaid he has an affair with, and the “common but pretty” girl in Gatsby’s party that he picks up
he markets his socioeconomic status where it will put him at the greatest advantage among women who are most desperate for and most easily awed by what he has to sell
Nick and Jordan
What their relationship represents
Through Jordan and Nick’s encounters, Fitzgerald is able to portray the idea of the modern woman of the roaring twenties – Jordan androgynous appearance signifies the gender bending common among flappers, which demonstrated their freedom from conventional female constraints
Jordan is indifferent and arguably hostile towards Nick, contrasting with Daisy and Myrtle whose typical femininity causes them to fall at the feet of their male counterparts
To Nick, Jordan is enticing because she is part of the middle-class socialites of the roaring twenties, which he longs to be a part of