1/168
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
general revelation
God making himself known in creation (outward general revelation) and human beings (inward general revelation)
conscience
the moral faculty which judges my actions toward others
judicial sentiment
the moral faculty which judges the acts of others towards me
implications of general revelation
- God is knowledgeable, but people suppress the knowledge of God
- We are accountable before God for our choices and actions, and are guilty before him by our own judicial sentiments
general revelation can:
- establish common ground for evangelism
- give weight to the case for theism
- display God's grace
- condemn sinful people
general revelation cannot:
- give a saving knowledge of God
verbal, plenary inspiration
plenary: full
verbal: every word
All Scripture is inspired by God, and each word is the exact word God wants used to express the message
intuition theory
inspiration as a high degree of insight
illumination theory
biblical inspiration as an influence of the Holy Spirit upon the biblical authors in increasing spiritual perceptivity but no special communication of the truth
dynamic theory
emphasis on the combination of divine and human elements in the process of inspiration
verbal theory
each word is the exact word which God wants used at that point to express the message
dictation theory
God dictated the Bible to the writers
what is the problem with dictation theory?
it disregards every aspect of human contribution
inerrancy
without error
absolute inerrancy
the Bible intends to provide exact scientific and historical data
full inerrancy
the Bible is completely true being free from all falsehood or deceit, but the references to scientific and historical data are not necessarily exact but rather general references or approximations
limited inerrancy
Bible is inerrant in doctrinal references but not in scientific and historical references
inerrancy of purpose
the Bible inerrantly accomplishes its purpose of bringing people to Christ. It does not present facts
rejection of inerrancy
the Bible is human work and naturally contains errors
allegorical interpretation
everything in the Bible is allegory
- Proponents: Origen and Marcion
literal (grammatical-historical) interpretation
what the biblical writers intended to convey by ordinary usage of human language; if the plain makes sense, seek no other sense
- Proponents: Lucian, Antiochean School, & Protestant Reformation Fathers
historical-critical interpretation
miracles in the Bible are myths, not history; historical Jesus is just a preacher once the husk of divine savior myth is peeled away
why is the work of the Holy Spirit necessary to understand the Bible?
- God's transcendence and man's finiteness
- Human reason's inability to provide the certainty
- Man's sinfulness
what is canon?
the list of books that provide a rule of faith and practice for Christians
the Apocrypha
meaning "hidden", in 1546 Roman Catholic Church declared it not a part of NT canon
What are the 3 factors in discerning NT canon?
- Apostolicity
- Orthodoxy
- Universality
When and where was the NT canon closed?
the Council of Carthage in AD 397
Dead Sea Scrolls
825-870 separate scrolls, discovered in 1948 at Qumran, every book of OT is represented
the cosmological argument
nothing moves on its own/ something must have set things in motion
the teleological argument
intelligent design, world must have been designed
the ontological argument
in order for us to even have a concept of God, God has to exist
the moral argument
since moral law exists, there must be a moral law-giver
incommunicable attributes of God
attributes that God does not share with others
- independence, unchangeableness, infinity, eternity
communicable attributes of God
attributes that God shares with others
- fruits of the Spirit
Elohim
God (OT)
El Shaddai
God Almighty
El Elyon
God Most High
El Olam
God Eternal/ Everlasting
Yahweh (YHWH)
the "I Am" or "the LORD"
Adonai
Lord
Theos
God (NT)
Kurios
Lord
Pater & Abba
Father / Daddy
3 factors of the Trinity
- unity of God
- deity of Jesus
- indwelling of the Spirit
Trinity Orthodoxy
1. There is one God
2. God is three persons
3. Each person is fully God
modalism
1 person, 3 modes
There is just one God that simply changes form when necessary
Arianism
denies the full divinity of Jesus and the Holy Spirit
God the Father created God the Son who uses the Holy Spirit in many ways
tritheism
believes that there are 3 separate Gods and not one God and 3 persons (Mormons hold this belief)
who illustrated the relationship of the Son with the Father to the fire igniting another fire?
Justin Martyr (110-165 AD)
Justin Martyr (110-165 AD)
illustrated the relationship of the Son with the Father to the fire igniting another fire
Irenaeus (140-200 AD)
talked about economic Trinity and was the first to talk about the eternal generation of the Son by the Father
Tertullian (155-220)
first to apply the Latin word trinitas to God and to develop the formula of 1 substance and 3 persons
Origen (185-254 AD)
used the word "hypostases" to refer to the 3 persons; also taught that the Son and Spirit are inferior to the Father
Athanasius (296-373)
affirmed the eternal generation of the Son, referred to both the Son and Spirit as homoousios and consubstantial with the Father
Cappadocian Fathers 4th c. AD (Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory of Nazianzus)
introduced the concept of perichoresis, Father Son and Spirit mutually indwelling one another
Augustine (354-430 AD)
emphasized that the 3 Persons' work is not identical but inseparable, and laid groundwork for the social Trinity model
"Man's chief and highest end is to blank God, and fully to blank him forever"
glorify, enjoy
Why did God create?
- to display his glory
- God's benevolence
- God acting for himself and for others' sake are one and the same thing
Alternative Worldviews
Greek philosophy
God is good, matter is evil
Alternative Worldviews
Pantheism
God is equal to all that is
Alternative Worldviews
Dialectical materialism (Marxism)
matter is eternal, and there is no God; Communism, or classless society, is the goal of society
Alternative Worldviews
Atheistic evolutionism (Darwinism)
no purpose or goal in history; everything happened by chance
what are the 5 Christian views of creation?
Literary Framework theory
Gap theory
Theistic Evolution
Progressive Creationism
Young Earth Creationism
Literary Framework theory
days of creation should be viewed as a logical rather than chronological structuring
Gap theory
huge period of time between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 where Satan rebelled and brought sin into the universe
Theistic Evolution
God used evolution to make everything in the world
Progressive Creationism
God created in a series of acts over long periods of time
Young Earth Creationism
God created in 6 days and creation is only a few thousand years old but apparent age was built into the universe
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)
discussed angels extensively, earning the title Angelic Doctor; placed angels in a hierarchical order
angels
- created spiritual beings that do not have physical bodies but can take on a bodily form
- they have names and are many in number
- they serve God's purposes and are involved in our lives
demons
- fallen angels and their leader is Satan
- they are active in human lives but are limited in their power
providence
God's foreknowledge, beneficent care, and governance
general providence
God sustaining the order of the universe in a general way, similar to common grace
special providence
God's personal and all-inclusive governance; nothing happens apart from God's sovereign will
Calvin vs. Wesley
Wesley: special providence includes both directive will and permissive will
Calvin: special providence is all directive will- there is no permissive will outside directive will
why pray?
- expression of faith
- primary means by which God accomplishes the goals of his providential rule
- God's command
- God's sovereignty
what does imago dei mean?
"image of God" refers to the fact that God has created us in his image
what is the significance of imago dei?
- the culmination of work of creation
- all human beings have dignity and intrinsic value
- the image of God is a gift
monism
idea that man is made up of only one element
dichotomy
idea that man is made up of two parts (body and soul/spirit)
- correct view
trichotomy
idea that man is made up of three parts (body, soul, and spirit)
Pre-existence
- held by Origen
- condemned as Heresy at Second Council of Constantinople in 553 AD
the souls of people existed as angelic spirits before the creation of Adam
Creationism
the soul is created and implanted sometime between conception and birth
Traducianism
the soul as well as the body are inherited from the parents at the time of conception
origin of sin
- meaning of the fall: choice for moral autonomy, choice for unbelief, choice for independence
- the symbolism of forbidden fruit
original sin/guilt
our sinful nature (and guilt) inherited from Adam
original sin: realism
the original guilt remains with us
original sin: federalism
the original guilt is imputed to us
original sin: Eastern Church
only corruption, not guilt
free will
The idea that human beings are free to make their own choices
determinism
the view that all events and choices are determined by previously existing causes
Pelagian Controversy
- condemned as heresy by the Council of Ephesus in AD 431
Pelagius taught that sinlessness was attainable and there is no need for supernatural assistance
Augustine and his view of free will
- strongest opposer to Pelagius
- free will but influenced by sin
- human nature = depraved
- inner grace necessary for salvation
- traducianism
compatibilism
the belief that God's sovereignty does NOT conflict with free will
incompatibilism
the belief that God's sovereignty DOES conflict with free will
self-determination (West)
the view that will is free in the sense that it is at liberty to do as it pleases but the sinful nature causes the will to choose sin
indetermination (East)
the idea that will is free and not inclined to either good or evil
Council of Nicea
The council called by Constantine that agreed that the trinity was "homoousios," and denounced Arius as a heretic
Council of Constantinople
The council that stated that Jesus was fully God and fully man, denouncing Apollinarius
Council of Ephesus
The council that denounced Nestorius and decreed that Jesus was one person