lesson 06 - Milgram

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

define obedience

a type of social influence where an individual follows a direct order from what they perceive to be an authority figure

2
New cards

describe Milgram’s experiment

40 American men given role of a teacher through a fixed draw and are ordered to give fake shocks to a learner (who they are unaware is a confederate) by an experimenter. the shocks administered increased by 15 volts with each mistake on memory task, up to 450V (a potentially fatal amount).

 

findings

no participants stopped before 300V and 65% went all the way up to the top of the shock scale, 450V.

many showed signs of stress, most objected but continues anyway.

3
New cards

prior survey prediction on how many people would obey in Milgram’s study

3%

many said that anyone who went to 450V would be a psychopath

4
New cards

Milgram sampling method

volunteer

5
New cards

how Milgram deceived ppts

  • tested obedience not memory

  • they were the participants

  • draw for role was rigged

6
New cards

Milgram’s method

controlled observation (no IV manipulation)

7
New cards

why did people obey in Milgram’s experiment?

  • legitimate authority: university/science legitimise behaviour

  • lack of perceived responsibility (agentic state)

8
New cards

define situational variables

features of the immediate physical and social environment which may influence a person's behaviour e.g. proximity, location, uniform

9
New cards

define dispositional variables

behaviour is explained in terms of personality

10
New cards

3 situational variables

proximity, location, uniform

11
New cards

effect of varying proximity

obedience was 40% when learner and teacher were in same room

remote instruction, given orders over phone: 20.5%

  • proximity means teacher cannot psychologically distance themselves from the consequences of their actions

12
New cards

effect of varying location

obedience fell to 47.5% in a run-down office

  • prestige of Yale university gave the setting more credibility and legitimacy

13
New cards

effect of varying uniform

researched by Bickmen et al - obedience levels were higher when confederate was given orders by those in security guard uniform compared to milkman’s uniform or suit and tie etc.

  • the more legitimate the authority, the more obedient the ppt will be

14
New cards

effect of buffers (someone else administers the shock)

obedience rose to 92.5%

15
New cards

effect of teacher having to force the learner's hand onto a shock plate

obedience dropped to 30%

16
New cards

effect of experimenter called away and the role of the experimenter was taken over by an ordinary member of the public

obedience dropped to 20%