1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Wage regulation and employment contracts
Wage regulation only applied to employees, if a worker does not meet the definition of an employee in the statute (such as an independent contractor), laws governing wages do not apply.
Wage regulation and occupation
Wage regulation can be excluded from an entire occupation (ex: lawyers or real estate agents), or to a specific job (ex: junior hockey player)
Some occupations may be entitled to higher or lower than the standard rates (ex: students under the age of 18 in alberta), and until recently, employees who serve alcohol on their jobs
Each Canadian jurisdiction has its own list of wage law exemptions
Employment standards laws usually fix a general minimum wage rate that applies to most employees and then list occupations that require rates different from the general rate
Employees earning a salary and not paid hourly (and not employed in an occupation excluded from the minimum wage) are also entitled to earn at least the minimum wage
3 types of wage regulation
Minimum wage legislation
Wage freeze or restraint legislation
Maximum wage legislation
Minimum wage legislation
Every canadian jurisdiction has a minimum wage that applied equally to both men and women
In history, minimum wage laws fixed womens wages at a lower level than mens wages on the assumption that men were supporting families and women were just earning “pin money”
Neoclassical perspective on minimum wage
This perspective claims that a statutory minimum wage causes unemployment by driving wages above market rates
Pro minimum wage camp
Relies on basic fairness and equity, and argue that
Minimum wage laws help the poor break the cycle of poverty
It reduces income inequality by increasing the disposable income of the working poor
Wage freeze of restraint legislation
A practice that holds wages at their existing level for a period of time, usually during economic crisis
Primarily used in the public sector (government workers, teachers, nurses)
Intended to control public spending and reduce budget defecits
Sometimes governments dont freeze wages outright, but limit e=increases to a fixed amount (Ex: 1% annually)
Wage freeze laws can override collective bargaining rights for unionized workers, leading to constitutional challenges (these are rare)
Governments rarely interfere in private sector wage negotiations, these freezes are usually the result of company policy or negotiation, not legislation
Maximum wage legislation
Limits how much the highest paid individuals (such as CEOs) can earn, particularly in relation to lower-paid workers in the same organization
Goal is to promote income equality
No laws currently mandate a maximum pay ratio between executives and employees in Canada
However, some Canadian governments have passed laws that regulate the compensation levels of executives of public sector corporations
Wage discrimination
Women with post-secondary education in canada earn 63% of what similarly educated men earn
Racialized employees earn (Men-78%, women 87%) of what their non-racialized counterpart earns
Workers with disabilities also earn considerably less than able-bodied workers
It is difficult to explain the gap because there are many variables involved
Women often have more career interruptions for caregiving responsibilities, they often negotiate less than men, gender stereotyping, and implicit gender discrimination
Regulating wage discrimination
Human rights statutes have long prohibited employers in Canada from discriminating in wages based on race, ethnicity, disability, gender, etc.
However, it is inadequate for addressing less obvious forms of wage discrimination, such as systematic discrimination
The human rights statutes are a complaint-based legislation, so it requires employees to learn their legal rights, file a complaint against their employer (which few do), and prove their lower pay rate is related to discrimination on a prohibited ground listed in the legislation
Equal pay laws (equal pay for the same job)
The most straightforward (and limited) model, targets gender-based, two-tier wage grids.
Comparable worth (equal pay for equal work laws)
Requiring equal pay for “substantially similar work”
Measured by: skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions
Limited scope
Pay equity (equal pay for work of equal value laws)
Designed to tackle systemic wage discrimination in female dominated jobs
Explicit gender-based wage grids have been abolished in Canada by equal pay laws. However, the explanation for the persistence of a gender wage gap is far more complex than just blatant sexism. For Instance, economists have observed that women tend to “crowd” into relatively lower-paying jobs (ex: retail, sales, and other service sector jobs; clerical work; and childcare), and more often than men, they tend to select jobs that involve lower risk, less travel, and fewer working hours (all factors that tend to be associated with lower wages).
Pay equity enactment
The pay equity legislation in Canada requires an employer (and unions, where present) to take proactive steps to ensure equal pay for work of equal value, especially to address systemic wage discrimination in female-dominated job classes
Pay equity statutes allow for certain permissible wage differences, but such differences must be attributable to factors other than gender discrimination (such as seniority systems, merit pay systems, etc)
Pay equity enactment steps
Employer (or unions) must:
Identify the scope of the pay equity evaluation
Identify the “job classes” that will be used in the evaluation
Identify male-and-female-dominated job classes
Evaluate job classes
Compare evaluation scores and search for comparators
Prepare and post an equity pay plan
Make upward adjustments to achieve pay equity
Identifying the scope of the pay equity evaluation
The employer must first determine what units will be included in the pay equity evaluation (Ex: entire organization or department?)
Identifying the job classes that will be evaluated in pay equity
The employer divides the workplace to be evaluated into “job classes”
Job classes can include a variety of job titles, provided that the jobs included in the class are similar in terms of duties and required qualifications or fall within the same salary grade
Identifying male-and-female-dominated job classes in pay equity
Define what job classes are female dominated
In Ontario, the pay equity act defines a job class as female dominated if 60% or more employees in that class are female
Evaluating the job classes for pay equity
Once the workplace has been divided up into male-and-female-dominated job classes, use a gender neutral job evaluation system based on
Skill
Effort
Responsibility
Working conditions
They then assign point values to each of these factors for every job class
Aggregate scores are assigned, reflecting the overall value of the work performed
Comparing the evaluation scores and search for comparators in pay equity
The employer reviews the aggregate scores of male-and-female-dominated job classes to identify comparators (compares both job classes that have similar aggregate scores, and the male-dominate classes become the comparators)
Helps identify if equally valuable jobs (based on total scores) are being paid differently
Resolving pay equity disputes
A pay equity complaint must be heard by an expert tribunal (such as a human rights tribunal or specialized pay equity tribunal)
If either party is unhappy with the decision, they can seek judicial review by a court
Current state of pay gap
The gender wage gap continues to exist in the Canadian workplace.
Pay equity provides an example of how work law (legal signals and legal rules) have great difficulty changing deeply ingrained practices and norms
The extent to which wage laws achieve their objectives continues to be a matter of debate
Challenges with regulating hours of work
Regulating working time involves persistent challenges because it engages many competing interests:
Employers: Want flexibility and the ability to assign longer hours when needed, without incurring large labour costs
Employees: Want enough hours to earn a decent standard of living, but not so many hours where they get too little time for rest, sleep, and some fun
Governments: Are concerned with encouraging a distribution of available work among the population that produces optimal employment levels, including low unemployment rates
Regularing hours of work requires a sensible balance, which constitutes the biggest issues in the law of work
History of working time laws in Canada
Unions first bargained reduced hours, vacations, leaves, and paid holidays into their collective agreements, and eventually, governments enacted hours of work legislation
1919 was when the 8 hour workday was first formed, and BC was the first Canadian province to implement this
Statutes implemented in the Canada Labour Standards Code (1965)
Standards 40 hour workweek
8 hour workday
Mandatory overtime pay at a rate of 1.5 times the regular rate
8 statutory holidays
Periods of leave and gradual amendments to employment insurance laws
Unionized and non-unionized employees are entitled to these laws, however, unionized employees may have a collective agreement that provides more generous conditions
Justifications for working time regulation
Maximum hours of work laws are part of the governments pursuit to make the lives of working people safer and healthier
Governments have used working time regulation and overtime pay rules to fight unemployment
Working time regulation is a tool by which governments seek to balance competing social and economic values
Challenges of contemporary working time regulation
Shifting worker classifications: reclassifying workers from “employees” to “non-employees” (independent contractors, gig workers), this reclassification can exclude people from these legal protections
Rise in self employment: OCED study says 25% of the increase in income inequality since 1980s is linked to rise in self employment. These workers are not covered by most working time laws
Government approach to challenges of contemporary working time regulations
Governments could impose a strict cap on the number of hours employees could work per day or week, but they have generally avoided this
Instead, they have opted for flexibility, such as allowing averaging agreements (spreading work hours over multiple weeks), requiring written agreements for overtime exemptions, and providing employer-employee negotiated limits that are within the statutory maximums
Principal models used in Canada to regulate hours of work
The regulatory model: requires employers to pay employees overtime pay after they have worked a certain number of hours
The averaging agreement method (not in QB, NL, or PEI): agreement to average out the number of hours worked over a longer period than the standard workweek
Regulatory model of hours in work legislation
Notes:
In NL, overtime is payable after 40 hours per week, and employees must be given at least 8 consecutive hours off per day and 24 hours off per week
Maximum hours of work rules may not apply in cases of emergencies, and in some cases, employers can apply for permits exempting them from some hours of work rules
Employment standards legislation sets minimums with exemptions, certain roles do not qualify for overtime, such as professionals (managers and supervisors, accountants, etc)
Should an employer pay for overtime hours worked, even if the employee did not get prior approval? (as long as the employer permitted or tolerated the work being done)
Yes, the employer generally must pay for overtime worked.
Courts and employment standards board focus on actual work being performed, not just policies.
Fresco v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)
Fresco filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of 31,000 customer service employees employed by the CIBC alleging that CIBC’s policies relating to the tracking and payment of overtime pay led to systemic violations of the requirement in the Canada Labour Code to pay overtime pay for hours worked beyond 8 hours in a day or 40 hours in a week
The Code (s. 174) provides that overtime pay is owed at the rate of 1.5 times the regulated pay rate when the employer “requires or permits” the employee to work overtime hours. CIBC argued that its policies required employees to obtain managerial approval before working overtime and, therefore, overtime that was worked without approval was neither “required or permitted” by the employer.
CIBC’s policy requiring prior approval for overtime did violate the Canada Labour Code’s obligation to pay for overtime.
Requiring prior approval does not eliminate liability if the employer knows or ought to know the overtime is being worked.
If overtime is worked and tolerated, the employer has “permitted” it, even if it wasn’t formally approved.
The obligation to pay overtime under the Code is triggered by actual work, not internal policy rules.
Statutory holidays
All canadian jurisdictions designate a list of statutory holidays, employees must be given the day off work or be paid a premium rate
Note: legislation also requires employees be provided with a break
Statutory vacation time
The amount of time an employee is legally entitled to take off work during a year
In NL, this includes: New years day, good friday, canada day, labour day, remembrance day, and christmas day
Statutory vacation pay
The amount of pay a vacationing employee is legally entitled to receive while taking vacation time
In NL, it is 4% of gross wages if employed less than 15 years, and 6% of gross wages if employed 15+ years
Leaves of absence
Time away from work that an employee is legally entitled to take (paid or unpaid) without losing their position
Some leaves of absence recognized in some or all canadian jurisdictions include:
Parental leave
Family, medical, family caregiver, and critically ill child leaves.
Organ donor leave.
Bereavement leave.
Crime-related child death or disappearance leave.
Personal emergency leave.
Sick leave.
Reservist leave