Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in nature.
2
New cards
Essence of Metaphor
understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another.
3
New cards
Metaphors are systematic
4
New cards
partial structuring
Metaphors only provide a _____ _____ of an idea
5
New cards
highlight, hide
Metaphors _____ some aspects but _____ others.
6
New cards
Richard's Semantic Triangle
a model of how linguistic symbols relate to the objects they represent
7
New cards
Relationship between the symbol, the meaning, and the thing
What does the semantic triangle explain?
8
New cards
Symbol
word, icon, gesture, etc. we use that stands for something else
9
New cards
Referent
the actual object (in real life) we are referring to with the symbol
10
New cards
Reference
thoughts and experiences; where meaning is developed in the individual
11
New cards
signified
Reference is _____ by the symbol
12
New cards
stands
Symbol _____ for the referent
13
New cards
associated
Reference is _____ with the referent
14
New cards
Fresh and faded
Two types of metaphor
15
New cards
Tenor and vehicle
Two parts of metaphor
16
New cards
Tenor
the underlying idea or subject
17
New cards
Vehicle
the means of conveying the underlying idea
18
New cards
Linguistic Relativity
language’s structure influences the way people perceive the world
19
New cards
Public Vocabulary
The culturally established and sanctioned words that compose people’s taken-for-granted understanding of the world. A public vocabulary forms a society’s terministic screens.
20
New cards
Ideographs
abstract words that warrant the use of power
21
New cards
Characterization
how we label the acts, agencies, agents, scenes, and purposes; terministic screens for the elements of the pentad; build narratives
22
New cards
Narratives
The stories we use to understand the world we live in; we often appeal to stories in order to induce action
sentences that use a passive verb in order to delete the agent of action
31
New cards
Foucault's rules that govern discourse
- Covering objects - Ritual with its surrounding circumstances - The privileged or exclusive right to speak of a particular subject
32
New cards
Semiotics
the relationship among signs, meanings, and referents
33
New cards
Denotation
the literal, common sense meaning of a sign, ostensibly value-free and objective
34
New cards
Connotation
the emotional or cultural meaning attached to a sign, it is what is signified
35
New cards
Terministic Screen
a screen composed of terms through which humans perceive the world, and that directs attention away from some interpretations and towards others
36
New cards
reflection; selection; deflection
Even if any given terminology is a _____ of reality, by its very nature as a terminology it must be a _____ of reality; and to this extent it must function also as a _____ of reality
37
New cards
Metaphor
a figure of speech in which two dissimilar things are said to be similar, offering a new perspective on a known issue
38
New cards
Gestalt
a pattern or structure whose parts are so integrated that one cannot really describe the pattern simply by referring to the parts
39
New cards
Doublespeak
language used in the real world to confuse or deliberately distort its actual meaning rather than to achieve understanding
40
New cards
Euphemism
a word used to denote a thing in a way that avoids connotations of harshness or unpleasantness
41
New cards
Inflated Language
language designed to make the ordinary seem extraordinary; to make everyday things seem impressive; to give an air of importance to people, situations, or things that would not normally be considered important; to make the simple seem complex
42
New cards
Condensation Symbol
a name, word, phrase, or maxim which stirs vivid impressions involving the listener's most basic values and readies the listener for action
43
New cards
function; subset
Rhetoric is a _____ of language and a _____ of symbolic action
44
New cards
Burke's definition of rhetoric
the use of words by human agents to form attitudes or to induce actions in other human agents]
45
New cards
Dramatism
a method for understanding the motives of humans through the analysis of their symbols - Not metaphorical - Ontological position
46
New cards
Pentad
Act, Scene, Agent, Agency, Purpose
47
New cards
Act
what happened
48
New cards
Scene
where it happened
49
New cards
Agent
who did it
50
New cards
Agency
how they did it
51
New cards
Purpose
goal of the act
52
New cards
Ratios
allow the critic to examine the relationship between two pentadic elements
53
New cards
No
Can we avoid terministic screens?
54
New cards
No
Do terministic screens lead us into relativism
55
New cards
Correspondence Theory
A word is linked to something in an objective reality
56
New cards
Two key characteristics of an argument
1. Arguments are necessarily interactive 2. Arguments are contingent
57
New cards
Deductive Reasoning
“moves” from the general to the specific
58
New cards
Inductive Reasoning
“moves” from the specific to the general
59
New cards
Toulmin Model
An explanation of the relationship between the evidence and the conclusion
a conclusion whose merits we are seeking to establish a. What am I trying to prove? b. "so"
65
New cards
Data
the facts we appeal to as a foundation for the claim a. What do you have to go on?
66
New cards
Warrant
general, hypothetical statements, which authorize the step to which our argument commits us a. How do you get from data to claim? b. the bridge c. "Since"
67
New cards
Rebuttal
the circumstances in which the warrant would have to be set aside a context in which the argument wouldn’t work the unless a. also hypothetical b. the argument is not absolute c. What are the exceptions?
68
New cards
Qualifier
a. an explicit reference to the degree of force which our data confer upon our claim in virtue of our warrant b. the degree of certainty we have on the claim c. How probable is the claim?
69
New cards
Backing
a. other assurances, without which the warrants themselves would possess neither authority nor currency b. using different data to back up your warrant
70
New cards
Demonstrative Argument
an argument that attempts to prove that something is or is not, to establish it as true or false
71
New cards
Refutative Argument
seeks to discredit or disprove a claim that has already been stated
72
New cards
Spheres of Argument
branches of activity–the grounds upon which arguments are built and the authorities to which arguers appeal
73
New cards
Three types of spheres
personal, technical, and public
74
New cards
Personal Sphere Argument
informal argument among a small number of people, involving limited demands for proof, and often about topics that matter only to those involved in the conversation
75
New cards
Technical Sphere Argument
argument that has explicit rules and is judged by those with specific expertise in the subject
76
New cards
Public Sphere Argument
argument that exists to “handle disagreements transcending personal and technical disputes”
77
New cards
Fallacies
an argument in which the reasons advanced for a claim fail to warrant the acceptance of that claim
78
New cards
argumentum ad baculum – the fallacy of the big stick
the argument is made with a threat of some sort
79
New cards
argumentum ad hominem - attack against the man
attacking the speaker rather than the claim
80
New cards
argumentum ad populum – the bandwagon fallacy
something is good because it is popular
81
New cards
argumentum ad traditio – the fallacy of tradition
we’ve always done it this way
82
New cards
argumentum ad verecundiam – the appeal to improper authority
someone (who doesn’t know what they’re talking about) said this, so we should do this
83
New cards
argumentum ad misericordiam – appeal to pity
appeals to a sense of pity
84
New cards
begging the question – circular reasoning
the truth of the conclusion is assumed by the premises
85
New cards
hasty generalization – too quick to an inductive conclusion
don’t have a sufficient number of examples
86
New cards
red herring – the fallacy of irrelevance
introducing an irrelevant element into the issue to distract
87
New cards
straw person argument – simplify and refute
simplify your argument to make it easier to knock it down
88
New cards
non-sequitur
the conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises
89
New cards
slippery slope
conclusions get progressively worse
90
New cards
false dilemma
you have to choose between a and b, but there are many more options
91
New cards
false analogy
things being compared are dissimilar
92
New cards
post hoc, ergo propter hoc
after the fact, therefore because of the fact
93
New cards
stacking the deck
only using examples that favor your side
94
New cards
argumentum ad ignorantiam – argument from ignorance
since the opposition cannot disprove the claim, the opposition must be true
95
New cards
complex question
questioning in a way to imply the unproven
96
New cards
equivocation
using a word differently in different premises
97
New cards
amphiboly
ambiguity from grammatical construction
98
New cards
composition
bad reasoning from the part to the whole (inductive)
99
New cards
division
bad reasoning from the whole to the part (deductive)