ROW 1: Establish Argument
convincing argument vs. argument
strategic selection vs. not well selected
supporting evidence
ROW 2: Understand and Analyze Context (Evaluate Solutions)
explains vs. describes
situates the teams’ proposed solution in conversation with them (additional)
limitations or implications — inconsistent, illogical, overly broad, or otherwise unconvincing manner vs. thoroughly explaining
ROW 3: Engage Audience (Performance)
all presenters vs. some presenters
strategic intentional use vs. uneven delivery or performance
most of the time vs. at times
ROW 4: Engage Audience (Design)
clearly guides
strategic selection vs. understanding
help clarify vs. does not enhance
inconsistently
team’s solution vs. team’s message
ROW 5: Collaborate Reflect
all responses vs. two or more of the responses
articulate detailed answers
asked and support vs. support
relevant evidence specific vs. some relevant evidence
[arguments from oral defense] taken together — [roughly] equal participation from all team members