1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Crash course
Breaks the worlds into individual human being
Revolutionary ideology
Freedom of the individual to do stuff as long as it’s not harming anyone
Find balance between freedom and not harming others
State is built to protect individual freedom
Origins and birth of liberalism
Emerges from the breakdown of feudalism and rise of commercial society (industrial capitalism)
Reflected the aspirations of the rising middle class - interests conflicted with the monarchy and aristocracy
Early thoughts were radical and revolutionary
Early liberals were called republicans
Tolerance
Ideologies are born as weapons
The Birth of Liberalism
English rev. Of 1688
American rev. Of 1776
French rev. Of 1789
The declaration of rights of man and citizen is clear pronouncement of equality
Read out in national assembly
The left (merchants) made money through shipping slaves (transatlanic slave trade)
Most profitable colony was Haiti- news of declaration travel to Haiti and they’re like yeah and organize launch revolution against France who fought back- only successful historical revolution by enslaved colonies
Released equality on the world and it destroyed their empire
The concept of the human (who is and who isn’t)
Embody liberal aspects
Advocated for constitutional gov. And later rep. Gov
Opposed social and economic privileges and the landed aristocracy - fought against the social hierarchies, obligations, and feudalism
During the process, spoke of rights of man, meritocracy, free trade, freedom of religious worship
Contradictions (ex. We have rights but look slaves, Thomas Jefferson had slaves and enslaved his kids)
History about unintended consequences
Themes of liberalism
Individualism - we used to just be part of social groups but this is the idea of being your own person with own thoughts and interests - with market forces more choice was up to the individual (who to buy from, who to work for), natural rights theories emerge, individual comes first, everyone has inherent dignity
Freedom - commitment to individual freedom, unifying liberal value, not reducible to mere license, autonomy and agency should be upheld, doesn’t include right to abuse others, positive and negative liberty
Negative absence of external restraints on the individual (USA healthcare)
Positive is the ability to be autonomous (a capacity) and fulfill potential (aren’t free if you don’t have good healthcare)
Reason - release humankind from superstition and ignorance and paternalism, individuals are rational and can define themselves, emphasis on education and brings about advancement
Justice - based on the belief of equality, equal in moral worth, individuals should enjoy the same formal status in society (rights), rights are for all
Legal rights (equality before the law)
Political rights (one person, one vote)
Toleration - celebrate social diversity, respect everyone? Belief religion and private matters are left up to the individual, pluralism
Meritocracy - equal opportunity (not outcome but potential), going far in life is decided by talent and hardwork, reward merit, incentives people to do best
Historical overview of liberalsim
Liberalism is a product of the breakdown of feudalism in Europe and the growth of a capitalist society
Reflects the aspirations of the rising middle class - interests conflicted with the established power (aristocracy)
Liberals are radical - sought fundamental reform even if that means revolution
American Revolution, English revolution, French revolution were all considered liberal even though they weren't called that
Challenged the divine right of kings - wanted constitutional, and later, representative gov
Criticized feudal system - place in society determined by the luck of birth
Questioned the church
Nineteenth century = liberal century
More industrialized led to for liberal ideas
Wanted a market free from gov influence
20th cent. Onwards, industrial capitalism was a powerful appeal for developing places in africa, asia, latin america, especially when it was on western terms
Developing world states don’t like liberalism because they value community over the individual - more of a breeding ground for socialism, nationalism, religious fundamentalism
Powerful ideological force for shaping western political tradition
Liberalism changed as the middle class succeeded in establishing economic and political dominance
Revolutionary edge faded
Became increasingly conservative - less for reform and more for maintenance of liberal institutions
Late 1800s onward - progress of industrialization led liberals to question and revise the early liberal ideas
Cold war saw consolidation of liberalism in the west
Liberal democracy spread with WG, IT, Japan and india getting democracies
And then some other counties
1960s - silent revolution started - liberal values spread (gender relations, homosexuality, religious observance, capital punishment, culture diversity)
End of cold war - some declared it was the liberal moment in world affairs
Overthrow of the communists saw lots of democracies popping up
In 1973 - 45/151 states saw key features of liberal democracy
2003 - 63% of states (more than 70% of the world's population) were liberal democracies
Franci Fukuyama claimed liberal democracy had established itself as the final form of human government
Implies it’s the default of human societies
World economy linked by neoliberal lines
Early 21st century sees the retreat of liberalism
Authoritarian ideas and practices popping up again (sigh)
Silent counter revolution sees resurgence of conservative values, especially with national identity topics like immigration and multiculturalism - expressed through right-wing populism
Liberalism was damaged by the 07-10 financial crisis
Impression that liberal political forces were more alignment with the interest of financial and corporate elites than they were the people
Individualism
Feudal period - no idea of individuals have their own interests and identities - people were seen as members of the social groups they belonged to (family, village, local community, social class) and that defined their identity
Market oriented societies emerged and people had a larger range of choices and possibilities
Encouraged to THINK for and of themselves
Science displaced religious theories
Society is understood from the viewpoint of the individual - everyone is special - natural rights
Kant thinks everyone is equally dignified the worth
Emphasising individuals as contrasting implications
Uniqueness of human beings - inner attributes
All share the same status - are equal
Tension in liberalism can be traced back to these two things
Some view society as a collection of individuals - everyone wants to satisfy their own needs and interests (atomism)
Can lead to the belief that society doesn’t really exist - only individuals do - based on assumption of selfishness
The individual is “the proprietor of his own person or capacities, owing nothing to society for them” - early on but later people get more optimistic
Liberals want a society where everyone can develop and flourish
Freedom
Importance of the individual leads to the commitment to individual freedom
Unifying principle and supreme political value
Early on, freedom was a natural right
Allowed people to exercise choice (live, work, shop, etc)
Later, see freedom as a condition where people develop skills and talents
Individuals do not have absolute entitlement to freedom - don’t want it to lead to abusing others
John Stuart Mill - the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others’.
Agree about having the value but not what it means to be free
Classical liberals believe in negative freedom
Everyone is left alone, free from interference and can act however they want
Negative because it’s based on the absence of external restrictions on the individual
Modern liberals like positive freedom
Ability to be ones own master
Develop skills and talents to broaden understanding and gain fulfilment
reason
The case for freedom is linked to faith in reason
Part of the enlightenment project - unleash the age of reason
Strengthen faith in individual and freedom
People are capable of pursuing things in our own best interests
Bias against paternalism - authority exercised for guidance and support of those below modeled after relationship between fathers and children
Stops people from making their own choices and learning from mistakes
Creates potential from people to abuse their position for their own gains
Knowledge flows from reason rather than experience
Liberals want to view human history in terms of progress
Love the scientific revolution because people could understand their reality
understanding increases with each generation - LOVE EDUCATION YIPPPEEEE - promotes personal development and social advancement
Importance of discussion, debate, and argument and that’s how conflict should be solved
Optimistic about people but know we aren’t perfect
War is seen as the last option - violence only when countering oppression or self-defence
Justice
Distribution of rewards and punishment
Give everyone what they are due
Wages, profits, housing, medical care, welfare benefits
Based on equality
Everyone is born equal and has human rights that transcend state sovereignty
Global justice and decolonization
Everyone should enjoy the same formal status in society in terms of rights or entitlements
Disapprove of privileges enjoyed by some but denied to other on the basis of race, gender, religion, creed, background, class - “difference blind”
Legal and political equality are most important
Non legal factors are irrelevant in legal decision making
Democracy - everyone votes how they see fit
Breeding ground for feminist beliefs
Equality of opportunity - same chance to rise and fall
Right to reward merit - incentive for people to realize their full potential
Equality means same opportunity to develop unequal skills and abilities
Meritocracy - inequalities of wealth and social position reflect the unequal distribution of talent
Just because no one is judged or prejudiced because of who they are
Social inequality is thought of as unjust because it treat individuals alike despite their different qualities and capabilities
Disagree on how things should be applied in practice
Classic like meritocracy but the moderns don’t \
Toleration
Willingness to accept and celebrate moral, cultural, and political diversity
‘I detest what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it.’
Ethical ideal and social principle
Goal of personal autonomy
Establish set of rules for how humans should treat each other
Guarantee of personal autonomy
Necessary to ensure vigour and health of society
Good ideas replace bad ones and ignorance is banished
Classical Liberalsim and it’s values
Earliest liberal tradition
Transition from feudalism to capitalism
High point during early industrial period
“Nineteenth century liberalism”
UK
Rooted in anglo saxon countries
Growing appeal in the 2nd half of the 20th century
Natural Rights
John Locke and Thomas Jefferson
Modern debate always has rights intertwined
Rights are invested in humans by god - human rights
Inalienable rights: life, liberty, property, the pursuit of happiness
Gov was established to protect rights and then the citizens will respect gov - if gov violates we can rebel
gov should not extend beyond maintaining order and protecting property, providing defence against external attack, ensuring contracts are enforce
Gov is best if it governs less
Utilitarianism
Rights are nonsense
People are motivated by self interest - defined as the desire for pleasure, or happiness, wish to avoid pain, utility
The greatest happiness for the greatest number - what policies and institutions will benefit society the most
Lots of impact
Provide moral philosophy that explains how and why individuals act the way they do
No one can judge what gives you the greatest happiness
Economic Liberalism
Mercantilism - dominant in 16 and 17th centuries - encouraged govs to intervene in economic life to encourage export of goods and restrict imports
Economy as a series of markets and operates according to the wishes for free individuals
Free market is freedom of choice - what to make - what to sell - what to buy - voluntary and contractual
Prices are set by the market - supply and demand - self-regulatory - no gov interference
Commercial liberalism - belief in the virtues of free trade
Laissez-faire economy
Neoliberalism was counter-revolutionary: it aimed to halt, and if possible reverse, the trend towards ‘big’ government that had dominated most Western countries, especially since 1945
Social Darwinism
Social circumstance is the fault of talent and hard work
Heaven helps people who help themselves
Inequalities of wealth, position, and power are inevitable and natural and there should be no gov intervention
Modern Liberalism and its values
Twentieth century liberalism
Further development of industrialization - expansion of wealth, poverty, ignorance, and disease
Hard to ignore social inequality - hard to believe industrialization brought general prosperity
Individuality
Promote pleasure that develop intellect, moral, and aesthetic sensibilities over pleasure seeking
Positive Freedom
Classical liberalism had given way to forms of poverty and injustice
Altruism - concern for others
Ability to do things
Liberty may be threatened by social disadvantages
Protect from social issues and the state can expand freedom
More socialist
Desire to help individuals to help themselves
Social liberalism
State intervention
Social welfare - modern states became welfare states
Social reform
Defended on the basis of equal opportunity - if people are disadvantaged the state has a responsibility to reduce or remove them to give them more equal chances
Right to work, right to education, right to housing
Positive rights - can only be satisfied through positive actions
Protect citizens throughout their whole lives
Equality is fairness
Desire to avoid poverty is greater than attraction to riches
Justice must be endorsed by citizens and have philosophical justification
Economic management
No laissez faire
Increasingly complex industrial capitalist economies and inability to guarantee prosperity if left to their own devices
Failure of the free market - great depression
Economic intervention
Keynes - reject self-regulating market - employment - manage economies through aggregate demand - gov spending will boost the economy
Economy needs gov intervention to a certain degree to help people and keep it working properly
Liberal Democracy
Dominant political force
Democracies spread mainly after the fall of the SU
Constitutional rule
Need for gov but scared of gov
All gov is potential tyranny against the individual
Humans will naturally use talents at the benefit or expense of others
‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’
‘Great men are almost always bad men’
TAME THE GOV
Constitution = set of rules to allocate duties powers and functions
Defines the extent of gov power and limits its rule
Bill of rights
Legal relation between the individual and the state
“Delcaration of the right of man and the citizen”
Can be established through internal constraints that disperse political power - seeks to stop anyone from gaining dictatorial powers (legislative, executive, and judicial branches) ex. Cabinet, parliament
Judiciary is means of interpreting the law - POLITICAL NEUTRALITY
Democratic rule
Gov by the people - involvement of the citizens
Gov for the people - democracy is public interest (representative)
Scared early on - system of rule by the masses at the expense of wisdom and property
Demo can become enemy of individual liberty - people are not a singularity
Democracy is the rule of the 51 percent - the tyranny of the majority - individual and minority rights can be crushed in the name of the people
Wisdom in unequally distributed because of education
The uneducated are more likely to act according to narrow class interests, whereas the educated are able to use their wisdom and experience for the good of others - HOW TRUE IS THIS?
J.S. Mill - he proposed a system of plural voting that would disenfranchise the illiterate and allocate one, two, three or four votes to people depending on their level of education
Founded on consent
Protective democracy - voting rights extended to the propertied and could defend their rights against the government
Utilitarianism implies that individuals will vote to advance or defend their interests as they define them
Unrestrained democracy is tyranny but with no democracy there is ignorance and brutality
Future of Liberalsim
Optimistic - convinced liberal values and structures will triumph
The end of an ideology
progressivism - slowly the world will progress and it is inevitable
Appeal is extending beyond the west
Marxists think liberalism is the enemy of social justice
May actually belong to illiberalism - opposition or absence of liberalism
Authoritarian regimes can compete with the economic performance of liberal democracies
More global income is held by authoritarians (russia, china, saudi arabia) then the liberal west
Middle class provides authoritarians with critical support