Study Notes on Constitutional Amendment Procedures and Judicial Review

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
linked notesView linked note
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

24 Terms

1
New cards
Explicit Restraints on Legislative Power
Refers to whether a constitution functions as a 'higher law' binding parliament, distinguishing between constitutions changeable by simple majorities or those requiring supermajorities.
2
New cards
Judicial Review
The power vested in courts or an independent body to interpret the constitution and test the constitutionality of laws enacted by the legislature.
3
New cards
Pure Consensus Model
A political model characterized by rigid constitutions combined with the presence of judicial review.
4
New cards
Pure Majoritarian Model
A political model characterized by flexible constitutions without the presence of judicial review.
5
New cards
Rigid Constitutions
Constitutions that require supermajorities (e.g., greater than two-thirds, or two-thirds) for amendments, making them difficult to change.
6
New cards
Flexible Constitutions
Constitutions that can be amended by regular or ordinary majorities, making them easier to change.
7
New cards
Unwritten Constitutions
Constitutions that are not codified into a single document but are based on a collection of statutes, case law, treaties, and conventions. Examples include the UK, New Zealand, and Israel.
8
New cards
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States.
9
New cards
Constitutional Rigidity Measurement Scale
A four-point scale used to measure the levels of constitutional rigidity, ranging from completely flexible to very rigid.
10
New cards
Judicial Review Strength Measurement Scale
A four-point scale used to measure the strength of judicial review, ranging from no review to very strong review.
11
New cards
Judicial Activism
Refers to the vigor and extent to which judicial review is exercised by courts, crucial for evaluating the rule of law.
12
New cards
Referendums in Constitutional Amendments
The frequent utilization of public votes as a requirement in written constitutions for amendments, which can serve either majoritarian or anti-majoritarian functions.
13
New cards

Constitutional Rigidity

Constitutions that require supermajorities for amendments.

14
New cards

Flexible Constitutions

Constitutions that can be amended by regular majorities.

15
New cards

Judicial Review

The power vested in courts to test the constitutionality of laws enacted by the legislature.

16
New cards

Pure Consensus Model

A model featuring rigid constitutions with judicial review.

17
New cards

Pure Majoritarian Model

A model characterized by flexible constitutions without judicial review.

18
New cards

Written Constitutions

Constitutions that are codified in a single official document or set of documents, prevalent in nearly all democracies.

19
New cards

Unwritten Constitutions

Constitutions that are not codified in a single document but are based on conventions, statutes, common law, and political norms (e.g., UK, New Zealand, Israel).

20
New cards

Supermajorities

Amendment procedures requiring a majority greater than two-thirds, or similar heightened thresholds.

21
New cards

Ordinary Majorities (Amendment)

Amendment procedures allowing constitutional changes to be made by regular legislative majorities.

22
New cards

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established judicial review in the United States.

23
New cards

Judicial Activism

Refers to the vigor and extent to which judicial review is exercised, crucial for evaluating the rule of law.

24
New cards

Referendums in Constitutions

The frequent utilization of popular votes as a requirement for constitutional amendments, which can serve either majoritarian or anti-majoritarian functions.