1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
how are most societies structured ?
in hierarchies
what is legitimate authority ?
agreed authority by society
they can exercise social power over others because it allows society to function
what is a consequence of legitimate authority ?
have the power to punish
authorities like police have power to punish wrongdoers
willing to give up some independence and control of behaviour onto those authorities
when do we generally accept legitimate authority ?
learnt at childhood from caregivers , teacher etc
when does legitimate authority have problems ?
when it becomes destructive
give examples of destructive authority
powerful leaders like Hitler or Stalin used authority for destructive purposes ordering danger and harm
when was destructive authority seen in Milgram’s study ?
when ‘experimenter’ used prods to order participants to continue that went against moral conscience
how has Milgrams study been used to explain My Lai Massacre ?
during Vietnam war 1968
American soldiers killed 500+ innocent civilians
destroyed entirely
Lt Calley was charged and found guilty
defence said that he was doing his duty by following orders
what is a strength of the legitimacy of authority explanation ?
accounts cultural differences in obedience
Kilham and Mann (1974) found only 16 % of Australian women went to 450V
However Mantell (1971) found that 85% of Germans went to 450V
shows differences in cultures acceptance of authorities and expectation of entitlement to demand obedience
reflects variation of societal structures and how upbringing of children impacts obedience
what is a weakness of the explanation ?
cant explain all instances of obedience even in clear societal hierarchy
Rank and Jacobson nurses were mostly disobedient when able to seek support despite working in hierarchical environment
Milgram’s participants also were disobedient in some cases despite figure of authority present
suggest tendency to obey is based on dispositional factors that fluctuate depending on the individual
innate instincts to obey or not has greater influence on behaviour than legitimate authority