State, Society and Public Policy Overview

These flashcards cover the key concepts from the lecture notes on power dynamics in political analysis, focusing on Dahl's definitions, criticisms of traditional views, and implications for understanding influence in society.

What is Dahl's definition of power?

A has power over B to the extent that A can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do.

What are the key features of power according to Dahl?

Power is relational, involves influence, and can be observed through behavioral outcomes.

What is the challenge in measuring power systematically?

Power needs to be studied through observable behavior and the outcomes of decision-making.

What does the decision-making approach to power emphasize?

Power is exercised through decisions, and those who frequently succeed in these processes are more powerful.

Name three methods of exercising power.

Persuasion, incentives, and sanctions.

What is a criticism of Dahl's view on power?

His view is too narrow as it focuses only on observable conflicts and ignores agenda-setting.

What do Bachrach and Baratz propose in their view of power?

Power includes both agenda-setting and non-decision-making.

What are the implications of Dahl's theory in studying political decision-making?

It works well in democratic institutions but falls short in explaining hidden power dynamics and long-term inequalities.

What is the main argument against the one-dimensional view of power?

It assumes power is only exercised in visible decision-making conflicts and ignores prevention of conflicts.

Define the two-dimensional view of power.

Power is exercised both through decision-making and the ability to prevent decisions from being considered.

List some key features of non-decision-making power.

Suppressing potential issues, controlling public debate, and using mechanisms like bureaucratic hurdles.

Why is understanding hidden power important in political analysis?

It helps scholars uncover the mechanisms that prevent certain issues from gaining political traction.

What challenges exist in empirically proving intentional suppression of political issues?

It's difficult to ascertain if omissions are due to power or a lack of interest.

Give an example of an issue that has been suppressed from political discussion due to power dynamics.

Healthcare reform options like universal healthcare are rarely discussed despite public support, influenced by lobbying.