1/75
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Credibility definition
judgments made by a receiver concerning a communicator’s believability (O’Keefe); or, the attitude toward a source of communication held at a given time by a receiver (McCroskey)
Credibility exists where?
in the mind of the audience
The three underlying dimensions of credibility
expertise, trustworthiness, goodwill
Expertise
endorser must know what they’re talking about
Trustworthiness
the source must appear truthful/reliable/dependable
Goodwill
the source should display empathy/care
Credibility & ELM model
Credibility is a cue to the peripheral route; if you don’t know much about something but someone credible recommends it, you’re likely to buy it
Credibility is most effective
When receiver motivation and need for cognition are low (peripheral/heuristic)
Charisma
a quality of communicators that sets them apart from ordinary individuals and, in the perceiver’s mind, endows them with supernatural, exceptional qualities
Three fundamental communicator characteristics
credibility, attractiveness, authority (aka, charisma)
Authority (Milgram study) ex.
“teacher” in white coat tells participant to shock a “learner” while they scream; shows how far people are willing to go to listen to authority
The four components of credibility (often relates to celebrities)
source expertise, source attractiveness, match-up hypothesis, meaning transfer perspective
Source expertise
perceived knowledge, skills, experience
Source attractiveness
looks matter
Match-up hypothesis (aka congruence)
endorser must be a good fit for the brand
Meaning-transfer perspective
celebrity’s image transfers to the product they endorse (ie., Messi’s image boosts Adidas sales)
Halo Effect (Cialdini)
one positive characteristic of a person causes us to see everything about the person in a positive light; experts/celebrities don’t need to have expertise in certain fields for us to give them credibility
Some age groups may be more susceptible to influence, including
Children (less cognitively developed); elderly (cognitive decline, lonely, can be naive)
Gender that is perceived to be a better persuader
Males; creates a double-bind for females because assertive women are seen as cold and we’re expected to balance competence and warmth
Cross-sex effect
people are more easily persuaded by the opposite sex
Reinforcement expectancy theory
people are motivated to act based on expected outcomes of behavior
Social Judgement Theory (SJT)
when persuading, craft messages that align with your audience’s anchor position (rather than latitudes of rejection or acceptance)
(SJT) people tend to avoid messages in their
latitude of rejection (LOR)
(SJT) your truest belief is your
anchor position
(SJT) positions similar to what you believe fall into your
latitude of acceptance (LOA)
Assimilation
when perceiving a message within your LOA/close to what you believe, you see it as closer to your position than it is in reality
Sexual appeals (“sex sells!”)
uses sexual imagery, innuendo, or alluring models to grab attention, induce arousal, and persuade consumers to buy products, often by associating the item with desirability, romance, or status
Cons of sex appeals
some audiences may resent them due to objectification; can be perceived as sexist, too distracting
Why/how do sex appeals work
they function as peripheral cues to persuasion; the receiver associates the product with sexiness/sensuality
Extended parallel processing model (EPPM)
four-step process model emphasizing severity, susceptibility, response efficacy, and self-efficacy
(EPPM) Severity
info. about seriousness or magnitude of the threat
(EPPM) Susceptibility
info. about the likelihood that the threatening outcomes will occur
(EPPM) Response efficacy
info. about the effectiveness of the recommended action
(EPPM) Self-efficacy
argues that the individual is capable of performing the recommended action (you have what it takes to conquer this)
Example of EPPM (COVID)
severity (respiratory issues and death may occur), susceptibility (highlight danger to elderly/children, or say loved ones are susceptible if middle-aged), response efficacy (wear masks, get vaccine; statistics), self-efficacy (others do these things and it works; you could, too!)
Factors that promote crowd conformity
group size (the larger the group, the greater the pressure to conform); social proof
Conformity
norms/expectations governing group behavior
Social proof
others’ behavior is used as a yardstick for how to behave; bandwagon effect
Groupthink (Janis)
members are so concerned with achieving consensus and getting along that they don’t disagree when they should
De-individuation
getting caught up in crowd; doing things you wouldn’t do alone
Peer pressure
peers influence you to do something; often shapes teenagers’ attitudes towards drinking, drug use, sex, etc.
Connotative meaning
subjective feelings, emotions attached to a word (ie. “lit” means cool/a good time)
Denotative meaning
explicit dictionary definition; common usage (ie. “lit” means to ignite)
Euphemisms
“sugar coating” language; making the worst appear better and vice versa
Profanity and persuasion
can decrease attraction, credibility, and persuasiveness, but is becoming more acceptable
Direct Effects model (Andersen)
simple relationship between nonverbal behavior and social influence → warm, involving, immediate nonverbal behaviors increase persuasion
Non-verbal behaviors
chronemics, haptics, artifacts, proxemics, kinesics
Chronemics
timely expressions like “instant results!”, persuaders prey on quick-fix mentality, but people may be scared off by this (psych resistance)
Haptics
touch (too much, like fidgeting/touching hair, can decrease credibility)
Psychological resistance
pushback against persuasive attempts due to sudden negative emotions like skepticism, annoyance, disgust, etc.
Artifacts
items that shape judgement and communicate perceived credibility/status; clothing, body art, jewelry, possessions
Proxemics
space and distance between persuader and persuadee
Kinesics
all body movement (eye contact, expressions, posture, stride)
Amy often fidgets with her necklace while presenting and avoids eye contact. Which nonverbal techniques is she poorly exhibiting, and how might this impact her credibility?
Amy is poorly exhibiting haptics and kinesics, and this will make her less credible
George stands too close to Carol when he is trying to persuade her to buy his product. What did he do wrong?
He overestimated proxemics, standing too close to comfort and creating psychological resistance in Carol while decreasing his credibility/attractiveness
Inoculation theory definition
individuals can be inoculated against persuasive attacks on their attitudes in a similar manner to the way they can be immunized against a virus
Process of inoculation
Topic presented → a forewarning → a weak attack & potential counterargument → a refutation/rebuttal that supports the initial stance
Example of inoculation
Forewarning (someone will try to persuade you e-books are superior to physical books) → Weak attack (e-books are better because paper books are heavy to carry) → Rebuttal (digital reading is superior because it democratizes access to information) → Due to forewarning/attacks, inoculation suggests you’d still believe in superiority of physical books
Why does inoculation theory work?
Attitudinal resistance can be induced by forewarning an individual about an impending attack on the attitude they hold by presenting a weakened argument against the attitude
Gain framed messages
emphasize positive results of using a product
Loss framed messages
emphasize negative results of not using a product
Peripheral processing
low receiver involvement; quantity of argument matters more
Central processing
high receiver involvement; quality of argument matters more
Anticlimax
first information presented is most memorable
Climax
last information presented is most memorable
Pyramidal
information in the middle is most important
Primacy effect
people tend to remember the first thing they hear
Recency effect
people tend to remember the last thing they hear
Considering the primacy and recency effect, what is a key tactic to use when crafting a persuasive message?
Repetition, repetition, repetition
Explicit messaging
claims are directly stated to recipients; ie., you should buy this product
Pros of explicit messages
often more effective because they provide clear directions for receivers; less risk of misunderstanding action step
Cons of explicit messages
can increase psychological resistance; people don’t like being told what to do
Implicit messaging
claims are indirectly stated and recipients make their own conclusions; ie., selling a feeling rather than directly stating product
Pros of implicit messaging
less risk of psychological resistance
Cons of implicit messaging
self-generated conclusions; message can be misinterpreted if it’s unclear
Narrative and statistical evidence
a combination of qualitative and quantitative research is the most effective