Understanding Arguments and Fallacies in Logic

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/21

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

22 Terms

1
New cards

What is an argument in the context of logic?

A set of statements (propositions) where one or more premises are intended to provide support for another statement (the conclusion).

2
New cards

What should you focus on when identifying an argument?

Look for the premises and the conclusion, and identify indicator words like because, since, therefore, thus, and consequently.

3
New cards

What defines a deductive argument?

An argument where the premises are claimed to guarantee the truth of the conclusion; if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

4
New cards

What is the validity of a deductive argument?

An argument is valid if its logical structure ensures that if the premises were true, the conclusion must also be true.

5
New cards

What is soundness in a deductive argument?

A deductive argument is sound if it is valid and all of its premises are true, guaranteeing a true conclusion.

6
New cards

What are key questions for evaluating deductive arguments?

Is the argument logically structured so that the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises? Are all the premises actually true?

7
New cards

What characterizes an inductive argument?

An argument where the premises are claimed to make the conclusion likely or probable, but not guaranteed.

8
New cards

What is the strength of an inductive argument?

An inductive argument is strong if the premises provide good evidence for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.

9
New cards

What does cogency mean in the context of inductive arguments?

An inductive argument is cogent if it is strong and all of its premises are true, providing good, true evidence for a likely conclusion.

10
New cards

What are key questions for evaluating inductive arguments?

How relevant is the evidence to the conclusion? How strong is the probability that the conclusion is true given the premises? Are all the premises actually true?

11
New cards

What is the Ad Hominem principle?

The principle that the character, personal circumstances, or actions of the arguer are generally irrelevant to the truth or falsity of their argument.

12
New cards

Why is the Ad Hominem principle justified?

It focuses on the argument's content and avoids distractions and prejudices that can arise from attacking the person.

13
New cards

What is an Ad Hominem fallacy?

A fallacy that occurs when an argument attacks the person making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself.

14
New cards

What are the two forms of Ad Hominem?

Irrelevant Ad Hominem (fallacious) and Relevant Ad Hominem (may be relevant to credibility but not to the argument's logical structure).

15
New cards

What is a figurative analogy?

A comparison between two things that are different in most respects but share some suggestive similarities, often used for illustration or persuasion.

16
New cards

What is the structure of a deductive argument by analogy?

If Object A has properties P1, P2, ..., Pn, and also property Q, and Object B has properties P1, P2, ..., Pn, then Object B must also have property Q.

17
New cards

What is the evaluation of deductive arguments by analogy?

They are generally considered invalid because sharing some properties does not guarantee sharing all properties.

18
New cards

What is the structure of an inductive argument by analogy?

If Object A has properties P1, P2, ..., Pn, and also property Q, and Object B has properties P1, P2, ..., Pn, then Object B is likely to also have property Q.

19
New cards

What factors determine the strength of an inductive argument by analogy?

Number of similarities, relevance of similarities, number of differences, scope of the analogy, and degree of conclusion.

20
New cards

What constitutes a faulty analogy?

An argument by analogy where the similarities are weak, irrelevant, or outweighed by significant differences.

21
New cards

What are the steps for analyzing and evaluating arguments and fallacies?

Identify the argument form or fallacy, analyze the premises and conclusion, and evaluate validity/soundness or strength/cogency.

22
New cards

What are key tips for success in understanding arguments?

Practice with examples, understand definitions, focus on differences, apply concepts, and think critically.