1/57
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
The neolithic revolution
10,000 years ago
major cutural change
transition from a foraging based economy to food production
Natufians
pre agricultural development
14,000-11,000 years ago
epipaleolithic
lived in the Near East
no domestication
harvested wild grain
stored surplus
increasing social complexity
Epipaleolithic
pre agriculture
near east
Archaic
north, central, south
Mesolithic
africa
How were differences in status in early societies identified?
burials
Broad spectrum gathering
broadened way people would get their food
climate leads to the loss of Megafauna
Archaeological site of Eynan/Ain Mallaha
village settlement, pit houses, permanent settlement
subsistence: wild grains; wild animals
Primary types of subsistence practices
hunters and gatherers/foragers
horticulture
pastoralism
intensive agriculture
Hunters and gatherers/foragers
primary focus is on wild plants and animals
Horticulture
food production of domesticated plants but with wild plant and animal supplements
Pastoralism
primary focus on domesticated animal with limited horticulture
Intensive agriculture
large scale use of domesticated plants with irrigation; bringing water to your crops
Climate change
leads to glacier retreat
sea levels rise
behavioral changes; have to do with society, culture
subsistence changes; hunter and gathering to domestication and agriculture
What was the subsistence changes caused because of climate change?
hunter and gathering to domestication and agriculture
How can we find evidence for major change during the neolithic revolution?
archaeology, zooarchaeology, paleobotany, bioarchaeology, climate science
Domestication
evolutionary process whereby humans modify the genetic makeup of a population of wild plants or animals to the extent that those populations are unable to survive without human assistance (selective breeding)
Agriculture
the cultivation and raising or use of domesticated plants
Primary centers of domestication
areas where plants and or animals were first domesticated
Secondary centers of domestication
areas that received plants and or animals that had already been domesticated
How can domestication of plants and animals be identified in archaeological remains?
size (metrical evidence)
morphological evidence
having a flexible rachis is beneficial for harvesting
Why were smaller animals domesticated in early domestication?
for safety issues
Four primary classes of evidence used to distinguish between wild type and domesticated animals
species of animals outside of natural habitat
morphological changes
domesticated animals are smaller than wild type
increase in animal population over wild species
age and sex of the animals represented in zoo archaeological record
Push models
can be referred to as stress models because they presume that humans are âpushedâ or forced into domestication and agriculture
Pull models
suggest that precursors of domesticated plants and animals thought to have had certain âattractive characteristics which drew humans to rely increasingly on them
Oasis hypothesis
created by Gordon Childe
push model
climate is a causation
animals congregate around these oases because of climate
humans settled around water sources and domesticated for survival
Natural habitat hypothesis
created by Braidwood
pull model
earliest domesticates should be found in the same area as their wild ancestors
farming was seen as a highly lifestyle
provided security as food was produced and store
provided leisure time
Population pressure hypothesis/ Edge Hypotheses
created by Binford
push model
this hypothesis was directly in contrast to Braidwoodâs hypothesis of natural habitat
people would turn to agriculture as a last result
equilibrium between humans and food
as population goes up, you need more food and lose more food from hunting and gathering
would go to domesticating for food
Social hypothesis
created by Barbara bender
agriculture was the means to which social inequality emerges
competitive feasting
change in social relationships
Where was the earliest domestication
the Fertile Crescent
Abu Hurerya
first evidence of domesticated plants (Rye) â- 13kya
uninterrupted occupation between 10,500 and 6000BC
Neolithic period
heavy reliance on hunting and gathering of wild species of animals and plants, respectively prior to the introduction of domesticated species
Abu Hureyra archaeological record
Floral analysis (evidence of both wild and domesticated plants suggest year round settlement)
Faunal record (heavy reliance on will gazelle hunting)
Evidence for changes in environment, economy, and settlement type at Abu Hureyra
decline in gazelle
domesticated sheep and goats
cereal and legume cultivation
Abu hureyra burials
ritualistic behavior
removal of the head; the skulls had traces of red paint
Abu hureyra trade
obsidian, malachite, agate, jadeite, and serpentine (turkey)
shells (Red Sea)
turquoise (sinai peninsula)
Abu hureyra artifacts
ceramics
Jericho
tell site
one of the oldest continuously occupied site
earliest neolithic layer between 8500 and 7000 BC
population 600
Floral records of Jericho
evidence of domesticated wheat in the form of impressions
evidence of domesticated barley
collected prior to the use of floatation
did not do floatation
Faunal records of Jericho
gazelle bones
domesticates (sheepâs and goats) become more important post 7000BC
similar pattern observed at Abu hureyra
Jericho burials
evidence of difference in status
removal of skulls
shell eyes replaced the eyes
Jericho trade
obsidian (turkey)
shells (Red Sea)
salt, tar, sulfur (Dead Sea)
turquoise (sinai peninsula)
Jericho artifacts
grinding equipment
stone tools (sickles)
New world primary domestication centers
mesoamerica
north America
South America
Key domesticates (plants) in the new world
maize, beans, squash
Key domesticates (animals) in the new world
llama, dog, guinea pig
Guila Naquitz
western mexico
easiest evidence of maize (5000-4250BCE)
presence of wild teosinte
Isotopes
alternative states of an element with same number of protons but different number of neutrons
Primary use of isotopes outside of dating
used for the reconstruction of diet with the basic principle of âyou are what you eatâ underlying this type of research
Two primary sources of variation in carbon 13 in human diet and bone collagen
different ratios of the plants that we eat
different ratios between terrestrial and marine foods
Isotopic analysis
will not tell you the last meal someone had, but will tell you the general food a person ate over an extended period of time
Carbon 4 plants
tropical grasses
have more positive carbon 13
corn
the percentage will be smaller
ex.-12.5%
Carbon 4 plants
non tropical grasses
have more negative carbon 13
wheat
the percentage will be bigger
ex. -26.5%
Nitrogen isotopic levels are related to:
the role of leguminous plants
trophic level (position in the food chain)
Nitrogen 15
the value of plants as they are passed through the food chain are done so with approx. 2-3ppm higher for each trophic level
animals that eat plants show N15 enrichment over the plants as predators show enrichment over the animal they eat
Temporal change In stable carbon isotope ratios form eastern N. America
spike in positive carbon 13
indicates that they were eating more corn by 1000 AD
western Mexico is trading and bringing corn to North America
Greenland viking study
oxygen isotopes
carbon 13
food sources coming from marine life which was related to climate shift
Roman periods
nitrogen to determine dietary patterns and cultural practices
spike in nitrogen â- breastfeeding and weaning
Consequences of agriculture
surplus of food as population increases
fertility rates rises
reduced time between birth as mother is breastfeeding
increase in morbidity (sickness) rates
increase in mortality rates
increase in population, more likely to get sick
zoonoses - disease transferred from animal to human
nutritional diseases
increase in warfare