1/148
Property Practice - Chapter 6
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Because a freehold lasts forever - also cannot be evicted by a landlord
The lease depreciates over time - the LL will likely retain control and therefore specify what the tenant can and cannot do.
The tenant may not pay rent/ take care of the premises
Because positive covenants are enforceable in leaseholds against individual occupants
Rights the landlord keeps over the leased property - they are in favour of the LL
A lease that lasts for a specified period and ends automatically without notice (‘expires’)
longer leases will often have a ‘break clause’ - i.e. a right to terminate
A tenancy that continues from period to period (indefinitely) until notice is given by either party.
Notice should be the length of one period of the lease - exception is a yearly tenancy can be terminated by six months notice.
A tenancy that can be terminated at any time by either party - is indefinite and can last any amount of time
Least security.
A covenant preventing the tenant from taking the specified action in all circumstances - landlord has total discretion on the matter
A covenant requiring landlord consent - the landlord will not be able to withhold consent unreasonably.
What is meant by an FRI (Full Repairing and Insuring) lease?
A Full Repairing and Insuring lease where the tenant covers repair and insurance costs - LL does not have to use rent to pay for repairs, maintenance and insurance.
Ensures:
the building is kept in good repair
the lease reserves a market rent throughout the term to ensure steady income (usually with ability to increase the rent)
the investment is readily sellable if necessary, ie the lease must be acceptable to future buyers of the freehold.
The tenant must put and keep the property in repair - even if that involves the tenant putting the building into a better state of repair than when they entered into the lease
What is meant by insuring to full reinstatement value? (what a property should be insured to)
What is a rent suspension clause?
A clause that stops rent being payable when the premises are unusable due to insured risk causing damage.
In the absence of an express term to the contrary, rent will continue to be payable even if the property is rendered unusable.
What is a rent review clause?
A clause which allows a LL to increase the annual rent in line with rises in rental value in the wider property market.
When is annual rent paid?
On a quarterly basis - (25th March, 24th June, 29th September, 25th December)
How has a covenant to repair been defined by case law?
must be disrepair first - before the tenant can be in breach of covenant to repair.
the property need not be kept in ‘perfect repair’ - reasonable repair
works of renewal or improvement go beyond repair - repair is restoration by renewal or replacement of parts of a whole, not renewal or replacement of the whole
can oblige a tenant to remedy an inherent defect (but not obliged to give back a property ‘wholly different.’)
What happens in a repair covenant if it includes the additional word ‘keep’?
A covenant to ‘keep’ a building in repair also means ‘put’ it into repair, even if that involves the tenant putting the building into a better state of repair than when they entered into the lease.
A covenant to ‘keep the property in good condition’ is more onerous than a plain covenant to keep it in repair. It can mean that the tenant is obliged to carry out some works, even though there is no actual disrepair
What happens if there is damage and the LL has complied with its covenants to insure the property to its full reinstatement value against the insured risks specified in the lease?
LL should be able to reinstate the property using the insurance proceeds from the buildings insurance policy, the premium having already been recovered from the tenant as insurance rent.
The landlord will not receive the rent from the tenant while reinstatement is taking place, but will receive an equivalent sum under the loss of rent insurance policy, also paid for by the tenant.
What will a T do whilst a property is being re-instated?
The tenant will be inconvenienced and may have to relocate on a temporary basis, but they will not be paying rent on the property
Once the rent becomes payable again they will probably be able to resume occupation of the property.
If they cannot occupy the property at that point, they may be able to break the lease; if they have no break clause, they will have to start paying rent again for a property they cannot use.
What happens if damage occurs and it is not covered by the insurance policy? (e.g. through agreement or high premiums)
The tenant will be liable to repair the property under the repairing covenant.
What does s.3 of the LTA state regarding improvements?
A tenant of business premises can use the provisions of s 3 Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 to enable it to carry out ‘improvements’, even where the lease contains an absolute prohibition.
Under s 3, a tenant who wants to carry out improvements can serve a notice on the landlord detailing its proposals.
The landlord has three months within which to object and if it does, the tenant has the right to apply to the court for authorisation to carry out the improvements
The court can authorise the improvements if they add to the letting value of the property, are reasonable and suitable to the character of the property and do not diminish the value of any other property of the landlord.
Can a LL offer to carry out the works themselves?
YES - in return for a reasonable increase in the rent - a tenant is under no obligation to accept an offer by the landlord to carry out the works and may withdraw its notice
If the tenant rejects the landlord’s offer, the court cannot give the tenant authority to do the works itself.
Why would a tenant prefer a fully qualified covenant for alterations
Because it clearly prevents the landlord unreasonably withholding consent for alterations whether or not they are improvements
Is there a statutory implication that landlord consent to change of user covenants cannot be unreasonably withheld
No - there is no such statutory implication for user covenants
What is required for a lease to count as an underlease rather than an assignment
The term of the underlease must be shorter than the remaining term of the headlease even if only by one day
Why do most leases prohibit charging?
The LL will be concerned that if the borrower defaults on the mortgage, the lender may take possession of the property or exercise its power of sale
What does section 19 subsection 1(a) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 do?
It implies into a qualified covenant against assignment that landlord consent cannot be unreasonably withheld thereby turning it into a fully qualified covenant
Give examples of pre agreed reasonable conditions for assignment
Requiring an authorised guarantee agreement (AGA) from the assignor and or a suitable guarantor from the assignee
Give examples of pre agreed reasonable circumstances to refuse assignment
Where rent is unpaid
Where there is a material breach
Where the assignee is not of sufficient financial standing
What duty does section 1 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 impose on landlords
To respond to written applications for consent within a reasonable time (except in a case where it is reasonable not to give consent) and give written reasons or conditions for any refusal or conditional consent
Give examples where refusal of consent to assignment has been held reasonable
Unsatisfactory references
Serious un-repaired disrepair
Risk of competition
Reduction in reversion value
Conflict with tenant mix
Intended purpose for the property after it has been assigned
Give examples where refusal of consent to assignment has been held unreasonable
Seeking an unrelated advantage - not entitled to refuse assignment based on grounds which have nothing to do with the T/LL relationship in regard to the subject matter of the lease.
Relying on minor breaches
Causing extreme prejudice to the tenant compared with limited landlord harm
What was the general principle from Ashworth Frazer on anticipated user breach
It is usually reasonable to refuse consent if the proposed assignee intends to use the premises in breach of the lease but each case depends on its facts - consider what the reasonable LL would do when asked to consent in the particular circumstances.
How might a tenant profit from an underletting in a strong market
By underletting at a higher rent than it pays under the headlease - tenant can make a profit.
Why might underletting be used in a falling rental market
Because no one will take an assignment at the high headlease rent but someone might take an underlease at a lower rent reducing the tenant losses
How can a landlord protect itself against underletting risks
By imposing strict controls or prohibitions on underletting in the alienation clauses - not uncommon for a lease to contain an absolute prohibition on underletting
What statutory rules apply to qualified covenants on underletting
Section 19 subsection 1(a) implying reasonableness and section 1 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 imposing duties to respond (give consent unless unreasonable and written reasons of refusal in a reasonable time)
Why might a landlord require underlease rent to match or exceed headlease rent and have linked rent reviews
To maintain rental levels and income if the headlease falls away and to preserve investment value (no loss in income)