Evidence Law & American Criminal Court System – Comprehensive Flashcards (Ch. 1–6)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/32

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A comprehensive set of flashcards covering key concepts in Evidence Law and the American Criminal Court System based on comprehensive notes from Chapters 1 to 6.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

33 Terms

1
New cards

Evidence Law

The set of rules determining what proof can be admitted in trials and how it may be presented.

2
New cards

Admissible Evidence

Evidence must be relevant (related to the issue) and competent (in an acceptable form).

3
New cards

Magna Carta

Historical document that introduced jury trials in 1215.

4
New cards

Three Branches of Government

Legislative (makes laws), Executive (enforces laws), Judicial (interprets laws).

5
New cards

Judicial Review

The principle established by Marbury v. Madison (1803) allowing courts to review the constitutionality of legislation.

6
New cards

Types of Jurisdiction

Personal, Subject Matter, Geographic, and Hierarchical.

7
New cards

Bill of Rights

Protects individual rights and liberties against government overreach.

8
New cards

Stare Decisis

Legal principle meaning 'Let the decision stand,' where courts follow previous rulings.

9
New cards

Burden of Proof

In criminal cases, the obligation to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

10
New cards

Exclusionary Rule

Legal doctrine stating that evidence obtained unlawfully cannot be used in court.

11
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio

Case applying the exclusionary rule to states in 1961.

12
New cards

Justification Defense

A defense claiming lawful act (e.g., self-defense).

13
New cards

Excuse Defense

A defense claiming lack of responsibility (e.g., insanity).

14
New cards

M’Naghten Test

An insanity test determining whether a person can distinguish right from wrong.

15
New cards

Types of Evidence

Real (tangible), Demonstrative (visual), and Testimonial (witness).

16
New cards

Circumstantial Evidence

Evidence that requires inference to connect it to a conclusion (e.g., motive or opportunity).

17
New cards

Judicial Notice

Acceptance of facts as true without formal proof.

18
New cards

Presumption

A fact inferred from another established fact, such as the presumption of innocence.

19
New cards

Fourth Amendment

Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

20
New cards

Search Definition

Government action that violates a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy (Katz v. U.S., 1967).

21
New cards

Probable Cause

More than 50% certainty that a crime has occurred (Beck v. Ohio, 1964).

22
New cards

Reasonable Suspicion

A lower standard than probable cause, used for stops (Terry v. Ohio, 1968).

23
New cards

Warrant Validity Requirements

Neutral magistrate, probable cause, and particularity.

24
New cards

Arrest Warrants

Required for private homes (Payton v. New York, 1980).

25
New cards

No Warrant Needed

Not required in public or during exigent circumstances (U.S. v. Watson, 1976).

26
New cards

Tennessee v. Garner

Case that limited the use of deadly force in arrests (1985).

27
New cards

Knock-and-Announce Rule

Police must announce their presence before entering (Wilson v. Arkansas, 1995).

28
New cards

Search Incident to Arrest

Allows police to search the arrested person’s immediate area (Chimel v. California, 1969).

29
New cards

Exigent Circumstances

Emergency situations justifying immediate action without a warrant.

30
New cards

Automobile Exception

Established by Carroll v. U.S. (1925), allows searches of vehicles without a warrant under certain conditions.

31
New cards

Plain View Doctrine

Officers may seize evidence that is clearly visible from a lawful position (Coolidge v. N.H., 1971).

32
New cards

Stop and Frisk Requirement

Requires reasonable suspicion (Terry v. Ohio, 1968).

33
New cards

Consent for Search

Valid when it is voluntary and from someone with authority (O’Connor v. Ortega, 1987).