1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
accent
shifting emphasis in deceptive way
accident
trying to disprove statement (that is usually true) by using a specific example
ad hoc
using off-the-cuff (no evidence); random explanation
amphiboly
the phrases and sentences that have a double meaning; misleading points
“I shot an elephant in my pajamas” →shooting an elephant while wearing pajamas, OR, shooting one that was inside your pajamas
argumentum ad ignorantum
argumentation from ignorance, no evidence
argumentum ad baculum
argument of the stick; threatening TO YOU; intimidating people to get what you want
argumentum ad hominem
to attack the person instead of the argument
argumentum ad misericordiam
use emotion or pity to hide actual argument
→Students using excuses to make teachers accept late homework
argumentum ad nauseam
belief that something will come true if repeated
argumentum ad populum (bandwagon)
argument of something popular so everyone will do it
argumentum ad verecundiam
appeal to authority but to an area outside authority’s expertise
—>Harry Styles selling cars, when he doesn’t know anything about cars
black and white argument (false dilemma)
presenting “either or” situation when there are other options available
bullshit (bs)
concealing the intended meaning
→”We need to get tough on crime” because vague sentence, avoiding any actual solutions, only statement
*ALL BARK NO BITE
complex question
double question, when first is assumed to be yes
composition
group must have same characteristic/qualities as members
→ one player plays good, so everyone/team has to play good
division
individual must have characteristic of the group
→dogs are common pets, doubermans are dogs, so doubermans are common pets
equivocation
using same term with different meanings
→ Law: Law of science vs. law by authority, law cannot be both of these because they’re two completely different things
fallacy of the beard
assuming that individual actions do not have a collective impact
hasty generalization
generalize base off few examples
→basing a conclusion based off few encounters
ignoratio elenchi (red herring)
use of another issue, usually emotion, to draw attention from something else
→somebody says someone SA someone, but distracts by saying what they did for the economy
*PAY ATTENTION TO THIS
nonsequitur
conclusion doesn’t follow from the preceding argument; flaw in logic
→Someone who doesn’t drink or smoke is a good husband
begging the question/circular reasoning
assuming conclusion as proof, seen as cause and effect of each other
→Reading is important because it is essential to know how to read
post hoc/false cause
something that is stated to be the result of something else when no casual connection can be found : falsely claimed
→three different diseases but placing it on one disease, when in reality it was all three
Slippery Slope
If Event A happens, it will bring event B (undesirable results)
→phones in school, students will not pay attention, they are going to fail, then never graduate
special pleading
reasoning that the rules shouldn’t apply to this special case
→Need to go to bed by 9, because sleep is important. “But you stay until 12 AM” Well I don’t need to because I’m an adult.
strawman (arguing off point)
when an opponent claim is misinterpret or overstated in order to be attacked or refuted
*PICKING OFF
→vegan doesn’t use animal products because they don’t want animals to suffer, straw man: so you think you're better because other people eat animals
Truth is in the middle
claim that average gives you the true picture, when it is not true
facts and figures to tell what is true but not accurate
→Climate change is true or hoax, so the truth is in between
false analogy
wrongful comparison of dissimilar situations
→School and jobs, students are paid with grades and teachers are bosses but jobs are for money and school is for learning
poisoning the well
unfavorable information is presented therefore any claims made after will be false
→ trump says Biden is involved in many countries and scandals, so poisoned the mind for tainted vision of someone
Stereotyping
using stereotypes as if they're accurate generalizations for the whole group
→ German people are not good at dancing, so that German girl probably does not dance well