Non rivalrous
the consumption of the good by one person does not keep other people from also consuming that good.
1. may provide the good themselves (use taxpayer money)
2. subsidize companies to produce good
goods that would be under-provided in a free market economy (e.g. healthcare and edu, health facilities, the opera). goods the government thinks have benefits to society all public goods are merit goods
1. depending on important government will attempt to increase supply and thus consumption, if the good is very important (edu and healthcare) the government may subsidize it completely/provide directly, if less important than subsidized left all subsidies paid by tax payer's anyways
Tax the firm to shift supply line to desired allocative efficient quantity. if externality fixed = internalized (problems with taxing: hard to measure pollution, hard to place monetary value on pollution, tax no reduce pollution).
Government could legislate/ban (pass laws regulating output) problems: may lead to job loses and non consumption of valuable product, and may be expensive to police law
issue tradable emission permits
Ban the good. Problem: most these goods addictive, and getting addicts to vote against may be hard to do)
Place partial ban instead (regulating where smoking is allowed)
Tax the good (shift supply line to meet allocative efficient quantity supplied) problem: if product is inelastic, tax will not reduce consumption (perk: great income for government), but it may deter non addicts, and if taxes are too high = emergence of black/foreign markets
provide edu/advertise against the good, problem: costly and may only effect in long run
Government Intervention Positive Externalities of Consumption + problems
Subsidise or provide completely. problem: very expensive, developing countries may not afford
advertise to increase consumption. problem: high cost and may be more effective long run than short run, must weigh out benefits
pass laws insisting on use. problem: infringement of civil liberties
MARKET Failure!
poverty
fossil fuels
green house gases
when there is a misallocation of resources in the price mechanism - when resources are not allocated to the best interests of society
5 types of market failures:
Externalities
under-provision of public goods
Information gaps
Monopolies
Under and over supply of merit goods/demerit goods
positive production
positive consumption
negative consumption
negative production
goods that would be under-provided in a free market economy (e.g. healthcare and edu, health facilities, the opera). goods the government thinks have benefits to society all public goods are merit goods
attempt to decrease consumption by:
1. if really important they will make illegal or ban (e.g. hard drugs and child pornography)
2. if less important they will tax it (cigarettes and alcohol)
Tax the firm to shift supply line to desired allocative efficient quantity. if externality fixed = internalized (problems with taxing: hard to measure pollution, hard to place monetary value on pollution, tax no reduce pollution)
Government could legislate/ban (pass laws regulating output) problems: may lead to job loses and non consumption of valuable product, and may be expensive to police law
issue tradable emission permits
Gov Intervention with Negative Externalities of Consumption
Ban the good. Problem: most these goods addictive, and getting addicts to vote against may be hard to do
Place partial ban instead (regulating where smoking is allowed)
Tax the good (shift supply line to meet allocative efficient quantity supplied) problem: if product is inelastic, tax will not reduce consumption (perk: great income for government), but it may deter non addicts, and if taxes are too high = emergence of black/foreign markets
provide edu/advertise against the good, problem: costly and may only effect in long run
Government Intervention Positive Externalities of production + problems
Subsidise. problems: expensive and difficult to estimate value of subsidy needed, (subsidy = opportunity cost)
provide vocational training (in the case of employee training) problem: expensive and may not work, but great effect on PPC and economy
Subsidize or provide completely. problem: very expensive, developing countries no afford,
advertise to increase consumption. problem: high cost and may be more effective long run than short run, must weigh out benefits)
pass laws insisting on use. problem: infringement of civil liberties
MARKET Failure!
poverty
fossil fuels
green house gases