Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
the law of demand
explains the downward sloping demand curve; inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded of a good
the law of demand in terms of opportunity costs
as the price of good 1 falls, people don’t have to give up as much of good 2 to buy one more unit of good 1 (lower opportunity cost). it becomes more attractive to buy good 1, causing quantity demanded to increase.
substitution effect
of a change in the price of a good, is the change in the quantity of that good demanded as the consumer substitutes the good that has become relatively cheaper for the good that has become relatively more expensive
if a good absorbs a small amount of the consumer’s income, the _____ explains the demand curve’s slope
substitution effect
if a good accounts of a large share of the consumer’s income, the _______ explain the demand curve’s slope
substitution and income effects
real income
income that’s adjusted to reflect its true purchasing power
changes in real income → substitution and income effects
money/nominal income
income that isn’t adjusted to reflect its true purchasing power
income effect
of a change in the price of a good, is the change in the quantity of that good demanded that results from a change in the consumer’s purchasing power when the price of the good changes
2 things to know about the distinction between the substitution and income effects
income effect → unimportant for a majority of g/s (doesn’t change consumption); most market demand curves are downward sloping solely due to the substitution effect
whenever the income effect matters, it usually reinforces the substitution effect
how income effect reinforces substitution effect
when price goes up for a good that takes up a large part of income, consumers of that good become poorer due to a lower PP → for all NORMAL goods, that decrease in real income leads to a decrease in QD, reinforcing the substitution effect that would have already occurred w/ an increase in price
normal goods
demand and income are positively related
inferior goods
cheaper/knockoffs, demand and income are negatively related
t or f: for inferior goods, the income effect reinforces the substitution effect
f: doesn’t reinforce it, the two effects work in opposite directions for inferior goods
substitution: price increase → QD decrease
income: price increase → real income decrease → QD increase for inferior goods
t or f: the substitution effect works in the same direction for normal and inferior goods
t
total effect of a change in price
combination of income and substitution effects
Giffen goods
goods that are so inferior that an increase in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded
income effect exceeds the substitution effect
upward sloping demand curve (goes against LOD)
little/no substitutes, usually can be addictive
in general the income effect is (greater/smaller) than the substitution effect
smaller (increase in price will almost always decrease Qd)
elasticity
used to measure the responsiveness of one variable to changes in the other
price elasticity of demand
measures the responsiveness of Qd to changes in price; the ratio of the % change in Qd to the % change in price
Ed = %ΔQd/%ΔP
drop the negative sign at the end → we use absolute values for this elasticity (negative is implied due to law of demand)
how to calculate the percent change of a variable (X)
%ΔX = 100 * ((New value of X - Old value of X)/Old value)
new minus old over old → N-OOO
as Ed increases, responsiveness of Qd ____
increases
elastic demand: high Ed, responsive
inelastic demand: low Ed, less responsive
arc/midpoint method
a technique for calculating the % change by dividing the change in a variable by the average/midpoint of the initial and final values of that variable
%ΔX = 100 * ((New X - Old X)/avg. of X)
avg. of X = (initial X + final X)/2
reasons why demand slopes downward
law of demand
law of diminishing marginal utility
law of diminishing marginal utility
explains the downward sloping demand curve; as you consumer more of a product, you get less utility out of it
2 effects that explain the law of demand
substitution effect
income effect