social psy term test 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/134

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:16 PM on 10/11/23
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

135 Terms

1
New cards

what does social psychology focus on and why is it important

  • social groups influence the sense of self (social influence)

  • we like and hangout people who share similar interests (intrapersonal attraction)

  • humans are social creatures

  • social environments influence what we do and how we feel

2
New cards

what is the definition of social psychology

the scientific study of the way in which people’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other people

3
New cards

what are mental representations and how do they affect us

we make mental representations of other people (group them) and it can affect our feelings and way of behaving

4
New cards

CORE PRINCIPLES (there’s 6)

  1. social situations exert power and influences our behvaior

  2. importance of cognition and how you interpret situations which guides the self

  3. internal factors, beliefs, and personality DO affect behavior

  4. importance of biology (influence of evolution)(and brain)

  5. applying what we have learned with past social psych principles

  6. scientific method

5
New cards

explain the typical prisoner’s dilemma

basically that cooperation between two people gives the best outcome

  • its the chart that has the cooperate vs defect

  • dilemma is that participants choose to protect themselves instead of cooperating in which results a worse state than if they had cooperated

6
New cards

explain the wall street game v. community game conducted by Ross and Samuels

  • the study took in competitive undergrads and cooperative undergrads and made them play a game in which they took turns cooperating or competing with others

  • some people were told that the game was called “wall street game” and others were told the game was called “community game”

  • this study proved that personality types dont define the outcomes of what someone will do in a social situation (the name affected the scores in a way that proved personality doesn’t rule behavior, it has an effect on behavior but social situations also cooperate in decisions)

7
New cards

personality psychology

  • individual differences

  • private, internal functioning

  • correlational methods are often employed (which cant directly manipulate one’s personality, therefore doesn’t show how situation affects personality)

8
New cards

social psychology

  • focuses on social influence and role of situation (therefore avoiding the fundamental attribution error)

  • experimental methods are often used (manipulates social situations and examine’s effect on people’s behavior)

9
New cards

dispositions

internal factors such as beliefs, values, traits or abilities that guide a person’s behavior

10
New cards

the people’s temple in Jonestown

proves dispositions (aka beliefs) can guides a person’s behavior

11
New cards

evolutionary psych

relatively new branch of psych that seeks to investigate the potential role of genetic factors in various aspects of human behavior

12
New cards

social neuroscience

an integration of biological and social perspectives that explores the neural and physiological bases of social and emotional behavior

13
New cards

scientific method consists of

accuracy, objectivity, skepticism, open-mindedness

14
New cards

common sense explanations vs social psy

  • common sense are invoked after we know outcome (hindsight bias), there’s different explanations, little agreement ab which is correct, and cannot verify which is correct

  • social psy predicts what will happen and uses scientific method to determine correct explanation

15
New cards

a _______ is a testable proposition that describes relationships that may exist between events

hypothesis

16
New cards

operationalization

translate theoretical variables into observable and measurable behaviors

17
New cards

reliability

yields consistent information

18
New cards

validity

measures what it is supposed to measure

19
New cards

replicability

ability to reproduce or duplicate research studies

20
New cards

a form of observational method, where the research examines the accumulated documents or archives of a culture

archival analysis

21
New cards

researcher observes people and systematically records measurements of their behavior

naturalistic observation

22
New cards

a technique where a researcher cues the behaviors of interest and observes participants responses in a laboratory

structured observation

23
New cards

research in which a rep. sample of people are asked questions about their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors

survey methods

24
New cards

methods that measure the relationship between physiological processes and aspects of people’s physical, cognitive, social, or emotional behavior

psychophysiological methods

25
New cards

technique where researches systematically measure two or more variables, and asses relation between them

correlational methods

26
New cards

cross-sectional

compare different groups to each other (age groups)

27
New cards

longitudinal

measure the same group of Ps over time

28
New cards

method in which the research randomly assigns participants to diff conditions and ensures that these conditions are identical except for the independent variable

experimental methods

29
New cards

which method is used in ab ¾ social psychology studies

experimental methods

30
New cards

2 essential characteristics of experimental methods

control and random assignment

31
New cards

how can experimental methods increase internal validity

reducing demand characteristics

  • use a good cover story

  • use high-quality control condition

  • minimize expectancy effects

  • use designs high in experimental realism

32
New cards

how can experimental methods increase external validity?

  • using random sampling

  • making sure mundane realism is high

  • making sure psychological realism is high

  • best test of external validity is to conduct replications

33
New cards

meta analysis

literature review that analyzes data from several studies that examine related hypotheses

34
New cards

the understanding that you exist as an entity with internal states

self-awareness

35
New cards

the belief that others are paying more attention to our appearance and behavior than they really are

spotlight effect

36
New cards

self concept

who am i?

37
New cards

my sense of self-worth

self-esteem

38
New cards

how can I explain and predict myself?

self knowledge

39
New cards

my roles as a student, family member, and friend; my group identity

social self

40
New cards

collection of traits, attributes and beliefs that individuals use to describe or characterize themselves

self-concept

41
New cards

working self-concept

subset of self-knowledge that is brought to mind in a particular context

  • influences your thinking and behavior

  • can be manipulated to see how behavior is influenced

42
New cards

self information is organized in the form of

self schemas

43
New cards

mental frameworks that organize info, feelings, and beliefs about the self and help guide processing of self-relevant info

self-schemas

44
New cards

self-reference effect

the tendency for information pertaining to the self to be processed more efficiently and better remembered than other info

45
New cards

“looking glass self”

our sense of who we are is shaped by other people

  • we internalize the opinions WE THINK people have of us

  • if you think everyone has good opinions about you then you’re gonna have high self esteem and feel good ab yourself

affects our self esteem

46
New cards

self concept differentiation

the extent to which persons’ self-representations are different for different social roles and contexts

  • for ex with my family i consider myself as kind, organized, and smart

  • with my friends i consider myself outgoing, messy, and funny

47
New cards

social comparison theory

we learn ab our own abilities and attitudes by comparing ourselves to other people

48
New cards

upward social comparisons

the process where we compare ourselves to people who are better than we are in a particular trait or ability

49
New cards

downward social comparisons

the process where we compare ourselves to people who are worse than we are in a prticular trait or ability

50
New cards

individualism promotes

the independent self

  • defining one self in terms of one’s own internal thoughts, feelings, and actions, and not in terms of the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others

  • emphasizes uniqueness and independence

51
New cards

collectivism promotes

interdependent self

  • defining oneself in terms of one’s own relationships to other people; recognizing that one’s behavior is often determined by the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others

  • conformity is encouraged

  • connectedness

52
New cards

why can introspection lead to errors when explaining our own behavior

it can only give us access to what is in our conscious mind (ex, cant explain mood)

53
New cards

planning fallacy

may underestimate how long we have to complete a task

54
New cards

affective forecasting errors

not good at predicting how we are going to feel in the future

55
New cards

impact bias

over estimating the enduring impact of an emotion-causing event

  • lottery example (habituation)

56
New cards

immune neglect

underestimating the speed and strength of the “psychological immune system”

  • after a breakup one feels the sadness is gonna be there forever, however we recover quicker than we believe we can

57
New cards

types of self esteem

global (or trait), state, implicit

58
New cards

general, stable, and conscious attitude toward the self (strongly influenced by genes and environment)

global (or trait) self-esteem

59
New cards

fluctuations in response to valenced events

state self esteem

60
New cards

general attitude toward the self that is not consciously accessible

implicit self-esteem

61
New cards

sociometer hypothesis (buffers social rejection)

  • self-esteem might be present due to biological explanations (evo theory)

  • ability to judge/value ourselves

  • may have aided our ancestors with reproduction success, if there is social rejection then we’re gonna evaluate ourselves which causes us to want change

62
New cards

terror management theory (buffers anxiety)

  • self esteem evolved in order to help our ancestors with existential anxiety (which interfered with survival/reproduction)

  • ability to evaluate helps with anxiety

  • high self esteem: people are gonna remember you and you are worthy

  • low self esteem: gotta change so people start admiring and respecting you

63
New cards

high self esteem can become a problem when

  • high, but unstable (or fragile): aggression, bullying, narcissism

  • high, but contingent self-esteem: negative impact on academics

64
New cards

self esteem in interdependent cultures

  • based on relationships

  • also focuses on negative characteristics

  • more balanced evaluation

65
New cards

self esteem in independent cultures

  • competitive

  • positive bias: feel good about yourself and ignore the negative

66
New cards

self-enhancement motive

basic and fundamental human need to maintain or enhance self-esteem

  • motivation to feel good about ourselves

67
New cards

self-serving bias

a tendency to perceive oneself favorably

  • positive illusions

  • temporal comparisons

68
New cards

positive illusions

we tend to see ourselves as better than what we really are (better-than-average effect)

69
New cards

temporal comparisons

recalling information in a way that leads to a favorable self-evaluation

  • when you compare your present self to who you were on the past

70
New cards

false consensus effect

the tendency to overestimate the extent to which other people share our opinions, attitudes, and undesirable or unsuccessful behaviors

  • “everyone cheats on exams”

71
New cards

false uniqueness effect

the tendency to underestimate the extent to which other people share our positive attitudes and desirable or successful behaviors

  • we think we are kinder than others or better in certain positive traits

72
New cards

unrealistic optimism

a phenomenon in which people see themselves as more likely than other people to experience good events, and less likely than other people to experience bad events

73
New cards

perceived control

the tendency to see uncontrollable events as at least partially under our control

  • watching your fav sports team play

74
New cards

overconfident judgements

people tend to be overconfident when predicting our own behavior

  • planning fallacy

75
New cards

basking in reflected glory

associating with successful others to increase one’s feelings of self-worth

76
New cards

self-handicapping

we anticipate we’re gonna fail, so we create an obstacle to blame once we fail

77
New cards

self-presentation

the act of expressing yourself and behaving in ways designed to create a favorable impression or an impression that corresponds to your ideals

  • social media posts

78
New cards

self serving attributions

the tendency to attribute our successes to dispositional factors and our failures to situational factors

  • getting an “a” vs an “f”

  • if you get an A then you think its because you worked hard, if you get an f you blame it on outside factors like teacher made test too hard

79
New cards

limits to self reports

  • positively biased

  • explanatory errors (self serving attributions)

  • prediction errors

80
New cards

pluralistic ignorance

a false impression of how other people are thinking, feeling, or responding

81
New cards

self fulfilling prophecy

beliefs that lead to their own fulfillment

(people’s social expectations lead them to act in ways that cause others to confirm their expectations)

82
New cards

social cognition

how people think about themselves and the social world; more specifically, how people select, interpret, remember, and use social information to make judgements and decisions

83
New cards

bottom up processes

data driven

  • forming conclusion based on stimuli encountered in the environment

84
New cards

top down processing

theory driven

  • filtering and interpreting new information in light of pre-existing knowledge and expectations

85
New cards

automatic thinking

system 1

  • quick, effortless, unintentional, unconscious, habitual

  • ex. intuitive thinking

86
New cards

controlled thinking

system 2

  • conscious, intentional, voluntary, and effortful

  • requires cognitive resources (attention)

  • checks automatic thinking

87
New cards

how r schemas implemented

  • there are multiple schemas we make about interpretations of the world however the one used will be the one most accessible aka the one in the forefront of your minds

88
New cards

much of our social information is _____ because ______

automatic; schemas can be primed outside of conscious awareness and control

  • subliminal

  • even physical sensations can prime social judgements and vice versa

89
New cards

availability heuristic in automatic thinking

a mental rule of thumb where people base a judgement on the ease with which they can bring smth to mind

90
New cards

representative heuristic in automatic thinking

mental shortcut where people classify something according to how similar it is too typical case

  • can lead to base rate fallacy: tendency to ignore base rate info

91
New cards

counterfactual thinking

mentally changing some aspect of the past as a way of imagining what might have been

  • occurs when alternative outcomes are accessible

  • influences emotion and behavior (regret, motivation, disappointment, “luck”

92
New cards

illusory correlation

perception of a relationship where none exists, or perception of a stronger relationship than actually exists

93
New cards

illusion of control or perceived control

ignore regression toward the average

94
New cards

mood

strongly influences how we think about and perceive the social world

95
New cards

mood congruence effects

we are more likely to store or remember positive information when in a positive mood and negative information when in a negative mood

96
New cards

attribution theory

description of the way in which people explain the causes of their own and other people’s behavior

  • we can make dispositional (internal) attributions or situational (external) attributions

97
New cards

how do we decide which attributions to make?

spontaneous trait inference, and Kelley’s covariation model

98
New cards

spontaneous trait inference

an effortless automatic inference of a trait after exposure to someone’s behavior

99
New cards

kelleys covariation model

in order to form an attribution about what caused a person’s behavior, we systematically note the pattern between the presence (or absence) of possible causal factors and whether or not the behavior occurs

100
New cards

consensus

information about the extent to which other people behave the same way as the actor does toward the same stimulus