1/134
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what does social psychology focus on and why is it important
social groups influence the sense of self (social influence)
we like and hangout people who share similar interests (intrapersonal attraction)
humans are social creatures
social environments influence what we do and how we feel
what is the definition of social psychology
the scientific study of the way in which people’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other people
what are mental representations and how do they affect us
we make mental representations of other people (group them) and it can affect our feelings and way of behaving
CORE PRINCIPLES (there’s 6)
social situations exert power and influences our behvaior
importance of cognition and how you interpret situations which guides the self
internal factors, beliefs, and personality DO affect behavior
importance of biology (influence of evolution)(and brain)
applying what we have learned with past social psych principles
scientific method
explain the typical prisoner’s dilemma
basically that cooperation between two people gives the best outcome
its the chart that has the cooperate vs defect
dilemma is that participants choose to protect themselves instead of cooperating in which results a worse state than if they had cooperated
explain the wall street game v. community game conducted by Ross and Samuels
the study took in competitive undergrads and cooperative undergrads and made them play a game in which they took turns cooperating or competing with others
some people were told that the game was called “wall street game” and others were told the game was called “community game”
this study proved that personality types dont define the outcomes of what someone will do in a social situation (the name affected the scores in a way that proved personality doesn’t rule behavior, it has an effect on behavior but social situations also cooperate in decisions)
personality psychology
individual differences
private, internal functioning
correlational methods are often employed (which cant directly manipulate one’s personality, therefore doesn’t show how situation affects personality)
social psychology
focuses on social influence and role of situation (therefore avoiding the fundamental attribution error)
experimental methods are often used (manipulates social situations and examine’s effect on people’s behavior)
dispositions
internal factors such as beliefs, values, traits or abilities that guide a person’s behavior
the people’s temple in Jonestown
proves dispositions (aka beliefs) can guides a person’s behavior
evolutionary psych
relatively new branch of psych that seeks to investigate the potential role of genetic factors in various aspects of human behavior
social neuroscience
an integration of biological and social perspectives that explores the neural and physiological bases of social and emotional behavior
scientific method consists of
accuracy, objectivity, skepticism, open-mindedness
common sense explanations vs social psy
common sense are invoked after we know outcome (hindsight bias), there’s different explanations, little agreement ab which is correct, and cannot verify which is correct
social psy predicts what will happen and uses scientific method to determine correct explanation
a _______ is a testable proposition that describes relationships that may exist between events
hypothesis
operationalization
translate theoretical variables into observable and measurable behaviors
reliability
yields consistent information
validity
measures what it is supposed to measure
replicability
ability to reproduce or duplicate research studies
a form of observational method, where the research examines the accumulated documents or archives of a culture
archival analysis
researcher observes people and systematically records measurements of their behavior
naturalistic observation
a technique where a researcher cues the behaviors of interest and observes participants responses in a laboratory
structured observation
research in which a rep. sample of people are asked questions about their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors
survey methods
methods that measure the relationship between physiological processes and aspects of people’s physical, cognitive, social, or emotional behavior
psychophysiological methods
technique where researches systematically measure two or more variables, and asses relation between them
correlational methods
cross-sectional
compare different groups to each other (age groups)
longitudinal
measure the same group of Ps over time
method in which the research randomly assigns participants to diff conditions and ensures that these conditions are identical except for the independent variable
experimental methods
which method is used in ab ¾ social psychology studies
experimental methods
2 essential characteristics of experimental methods
control and random assignment
how can experimental methods increase internal validity
reducing demand characteristics
use a good cover story
use high-quality control condition
minimize expectancy effects
use designs high in experimental realism
how can experimental methods increase external validity?
using random sampling
making sure mundane realism is high
making sure psychological realism is high
best test of external validity is to conduct replications
meta analysis
literature review that analyzes data from several studies that examine related hypotheses
the understanding that you exist as an entity with internal states
self-awareness
the belief that others are paying more attention to our appearance and behavior than they really are
spotlight effect
self concept
who am i?
my sense of self-worth
self-esteem
how can I explain and predict myself?
self knowledge
my roles as a student, family member, and friend; my group identity
social self
collection of traits, attributes and beliefs that individuals use to describe or characterize themselves
self-concept
working self-concept
subset of self-knowledge that is brought to mind in a particular context
influences your thinking and behavior
can be manipulated to see how behavior is influenced
self information is organized in the form of
self schemas
mental frameworks that organize info, feelings, and beliefs about the self and help guide processing of self-relevant info
self-schemas
self-reference effect
the tendency for information pertaining to the self to be processed more efficiently and better remembered than other info
“looking glass self”
our sense of who we are is shaped by other people
we internalize the opinions WE THINK people have of us
if you think everyone has good opinions about you then you’re gonna have high self esteem and feel good ab yourself
affects our self esteem
self concept differentiation
the extent to which persons’ self-representations are different for different social roles and contexts
for ex with my family i consider myself as kind, organized, and smart
with my friends i consider myself outgoing, messy, and funny
social comparison theory
we learn ab our own abilities and attitudes by comparing ourselves to other people
upward social comparisons
the process where we compare ourselves to people who are better than we are in a particular trait or ability
downward social comparisons
the process where we compare ourselves to people who are worse than we are in a prticular trait or ability
individualism promotes
the independent self
defining one self in terms of one’s own internal thoughts, feelings, and actions, and not in terms of the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others
emphasizes uniqueness and independence
collectivism promotes
interdependent self
defining oneself in terms of one’s own relationships to other people; recognizing that one’s behavior is often determined by the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others
conformity is encouraged
connectedness
why can introspection lead to errors when explaining our own behavior
it can only give us access to what is in our conscious mind (ex, cant explain mood)
planning fallacy
may underestimate how long we have to complete a task
affective forecasting errors
not good at predicting how we are going to feel in the future
impact bias
over estimating the enduring impact of an emotion-causing event
lottery example (habituation)
immune neglect
underestimating the speed and strength of the “psychological immune system”
after a breakup one feels the sadness is gonna be there forever, however we recover quicker than we believe we can
types of self esteem
global (or trait), state, implicit
general, stable, and conscious attitude toward the self (strongly influenced by genes and environment)
global (or trait) self-esteem
fluctuations in response to valenced events
state self esteem
general attitude toward the self that is not consciously accessible
implicit self-esteem
sociometer hypothesis (buffers social rejection)
self-esteem might be present due to biological explanations (evo theory)
ability to judge/value ourselves
may have aided our ancestors with reproduction success, if there is social rejection then we’re gonna evaluate ourselves which causes us to want change
terror management theory (buffers anxiety)
self esteem evolved in order to help our ancestors with existential anxiety (which interfered with survival/reproduction)
ability to evaluate helps with anxiety
high self esteem: people are gonna remember you and you are worthy
low self esteem: gotta change so people start admiring and respecting you
high self esteem can become a problem when
high, but unstable (or fragile): aggression, bullying, narcissism
high, but contingent self-esteem: negative impact on academics
self esteem in interdependent cultures
based on relationships
also focuses on negative characteristics
more balanced evaluation
self esteem in independent cultures
competitive
positive bias: feel good about yourself and ignore the negative
self-enhancement motive
basic and fundamental human need to maintain or enhance self-esteem
motivation to feel good about ourselves
self-serving bias
a tendency to perceive oneself favorably
positive illusions
temporal comparisons
positive illusions
we tend to see ourselves as better than what we really are (better-than-average effect)
temporal comparisons
recalling information in a way that leads to a favorable self-evaluation
when you compare your present self to who you were on the past
false consensus effect
the tendency to overestimate the extent to which other people share our opinions, attitudes, and undesirable or unsuccessful behaviors
“everyone cheats on exams”
false uniqueness effect
the tendency to underestimate the extent to which other people share our positive attitudes and desirable or successful behaviors
we think we are kinder than others or better in certain positive traits
unrealistic optimism
a phenomenon in which people see themselves as more likely than other people to experience good events, and less likely than other people to experience bad events
perceived control
the tendency to see uncontrollable events as at least partially under our control
watching your fav sports team play
overconfident judgements
people tend to be overconfident when predicting our own behavior
planning fallacy
basking in reflected glory
associating with successful others to increase one’s feelings of self-worth
self-handicapping
we anticipate we’re gonna fail, so we create an obstacle to blame once we fail
self-presentation
the act of expressing yourself and behaving in ways designed to create a favorable impression or an impression that corresponds to your ideals
social media posts
self serving attributions
the tendency to attribute our successes to dispositional factors and our failures to situational factors
getting an “a” vs an “f”
if you get an A then you think its because you worked hard, if you get an f you blame it on outside factors like teacher made test too hard
limits to self reports
positively biased
explanatory errors (self serving attributions)
prediction errors
pluralistic ignorance
a false impression of how other people are thinking, feeling, or responding
self fulfilling prophecy
beliefs that lead to their own fulfillment
(people’s social expectations lead them to act in ways that cause others to confirm their expectations)
social cognition
how people think about themselves and the social world; more specifically, how people select, interpret, remember, and use social information to make judgements and decisions
bottom up processes
data driven
forming conclusion based on stimuli encountered in the environment
top down processing
theory driven
filtering and interpreting new information in light of pre-existing knowledge and expectations
automatic thinking
system 1
quick, effortless, unintentional, unconscious, habitual
ex. intuitive thinking
controlled thinking
system 2
conscious, intentional, voluntary, and effortful
requires cognitive resources (attention)
checks automatic thinking
how r schemas implemented
there are multiple schemas we make about interpretations of the world however the one used will be the one most accessible aka the one in the forefront of your minds
much of our social information is _____ because ______
automatic; schemas can be primed outside of conscious awareness and control
subliminal
even physical sensations can prime social judgements and vice versa
availability heuristic in automatic thinking
a mental rule of thumb where people base a judgement on the ease with which they can bring smth to mind
representative heuristic in automatic thinking
mental shortcut where people classify something according to how similar it is too typical case
can lead to base rate fallacy: tendency to ignore base rate info
counterfactual thinking
mentally changing some aspect of the past as a way of imagining what might have been
occurs when alternative outcomes are accessible
influences emotion and behavior (regret, motivation, disappointment, “luck”
illusory correlation
perception of a relationship where none exists, or perception of a stronger relationship than actually exists
illusion of control or perceived control
ignore regression toward the average
mood
strongly influences how we think about and perceive the social world
mood congruence effects
we are more likely to store or remember positive information when in a positive mood and negative information when in a negative mood
attribution theory
description of the way in which people explain the causes of their own and other people’s behavior
we can make dispositional (internal) attributions or situational (external) attributions
how do we decide which attributions to make?
spontaneous trait inference, and Kelley’s covariation model
spontaneous trait inference
an effortless automatic inference of a trait after exposure to someone’s behavior
kelleys covariation model
in order to form an attribution about what caused a person’s behavior, we systematically note the pattern between the presence (or absence) of possible causal factors and whether or not the behavior occurs
consensus
information about the extent to which other people behave the same way as the actor does toward the same stimulus